The biggest asset which is one mile long is the beach.
The biggest building on the bw was pretty quiet on entertainment last year.
If mm also bought the rights to the phase two and three of wesleygriove how
come no one is yelling at them. And im sure someone may relook at the drawings
again.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf oakdorf@... wrote:
The biggest asset which is one mile long is the beach.
The biggest building on the bw was pretty quiet on entertainment last year.
If mm also bought the rights to the phase two and three of wesleygriove how
come no one is
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, arhythmick arhythmick@... wrote:
I heard the city was forming a committee to re-look at the waterfront
redevelopment and potentially recommend something new and more appropriate to
this decade. I though that was a wise idea. Does the WRA only have a
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, arhythmick arhythmick@... wrote:
Even so, it seems to me that MM (and hopefully iStar) already see that
entertainment and taking advantage of our architectural assets is the best
way forward versus just tons of condos.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, wernerapnj wernerapnj@... wrote:
Many issues here. As I've said - We need to know who we are dealing with and
what property/rights they hold... some factual data collection.
Volunteers?
Werner
You can do it. Public records are available
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny dfsavgny@... wrote:
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, wernerapnj wernerapnj@ wrote:
Many issues here. As I've said - We need to know who we are dealing with
and what property/rights they hold... some factual data collection.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, wernerapnj wernerapnj@... wrote:
My intent is to get people interested and engaged in this besides me. I have
spent over 30 years researching and advocating for this City. Some others
need to step-up and lend a hand. How about you since you know the
Werner,
I can export a report that does nothing other then summarize who owns what.
There's no real useful data.
I have no clue as to the true ownership or contracts made between the
parties, lenders, developers ,subdevelopers, city etc etc etc.
You don't know exactly what collateral
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, arhythmick arhythmick@... wrote:
It seems to be at least part of the objective of taking iStar to court was to
get their attention, and get them moving. the city claimed there were
developers ready, willing and able to move forward right now...that those
So assume they lose the master developer right (unlikely).
They still own the land.
Their value is in the land which a new developer can come along and buy based
on the right to develop something. If they can build a one bedroom house on
one acre, then they would need to find someone who
I heard the city was forming a committee to re-look at the waterfront
redevelopment and potentially recommend something new and more appropriate to
this decade. I though that was a wise idea. Does the WRA only have a chance
for change if the town wins back the rights? I guess that makes sense.
Oak - I'm having a hard time following/relating to your train of thought.
Could you narrow it down to Who owns What ?
You are in the real estate business.. right?
Could you kindly look up the property ownership
of various parcels in the Waterfront Redevelopment Area (WRA)?
For example who owns
It seems to be at least part of the objective of taking iStar to court was to
get their attention, and get them moving. the city claimed there were
developers ready, willing and able to move forward right now...that those
developers approached the city directly. perhaps, this action will get
13 matches
Mail list logo
