>> Fritz... why don't you just "fork" the report generation ?
> Because we have already developed V2. It is NOT a simple task to
> "fork" in all platforms. Especially not in Windows. Therefore a lot of
> work went into the multithreading version.
Uh ?!?
#!/usr/bin/perl
my $pid = fork();
if (no
Hi,
Could you post a changelog for each new assp release (like RC0.2.10) ? it
should be usefull to know if new release solve my problem or improve perf.
Thanks
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Che
Yes, there is a 'fork' implementation in Perl for Windows. But is very
different from the one that is running in other OS's. Windows does not
know a system call 'fork'. So Perl has to emulate this call in Windows
(using iThreads).
There are some very good reasons for us, to never use 'fork' (e
> Yes, there is a 'fork' implementation in Perl for Windows. But is very
> different from the one that is running in other OS's. Windows does not
> know a system call 'fork'. So Perl has to emulate this call in Windows
> (using iThreads).
Yes, I know that, I did my homework before suggesting the "
G> Yes, I know that, I did my homework before suggesting the "fork" :)
G> http://www.xav.com/perl/lib/Pod/perlfork.html
G> but...
Please read your own source:
Since the fork() emulation runs code in multiple threads, extensions
"calling into non-thread-safe libraries may not work reliably when cal
Is here somebody running Merak and knows if it supports subadressing
and how?
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distri
>> http://www.xav.com/perl/lib/Pod/perlfork.html
> Please read your own source:
I did
> Since the fork() emulation runs code in multiple threads, extensions
> "calling into non-thread-safe libraries may not work reliably when
calling
> fork(). As Perl's threading support gradually becomes more w
I put the fork in 1.5.1.4. It is a trial balloon.
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine
G> maybe, or maybe not
Maybe I am wrong :)
--
Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh
Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau
+49 851 50477-22 Fax: +49 851 50477-29
http://www.haack-it.de
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Run
Matti Haack schreibt:
>Maybe I am wrong :)
No, you are not wrong. The coding is the simple part in some decisions
we have to do. We are trying to keep V1 and V2 as code-compatible as
possible because we are only two developers. Going for a fork in V1
only because very few users are running V1 wi
>> Maybe I am wrong :)
> No, you are not wrong. The coding is the simple part in some
> decisions we have to do. We are trying to keep V1 and V2 as
> code-compatible as possible because we are only two developers.
> Going for a fork in V1 only because very few users are running V1
> with big logfi
Hi,
In ASSP_1.5.1.3_Install.zip - the file called "suspiciousvirus.txt" in the
"assp/files" folder does not contain any "~" characters in the list.
Are these not now required?
Regards
Peter Ingham
Disclaimer: The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. Its
peter.ing...@a-one.co.uk schreibt:
>
>Are these not now required?
no. we changed that requirement to : only a regex with '|' in it is
required to be masked by ~
Fields marked with two asterisk (**) contains regular expressions
(regex) and accept a second weight value. Every weighted regex that
co
I just noticed that the domain "lifesaversitelive.com" was detected as
as White Organization "live.com"
I'm wondering if this is a coincidence or a bug (ASSP 1.5.1.3(0.3.08))?
>From Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:05:35 -0400
X-Connect-IP: 10.0.0.1
X-Envelope-To:
X-SEF-MessageID: 2D847205-4831-495B-8FB2-12
> I just noticed that the domain "lifesaversitelive.com" was detected as
> as White Organization "live.com"
> I'm wondering if this is a coincidence or a bug (ASSP
1.5.1.3(0.3.08))?
Yup, sounds like a bug, the senderbase returns the following
IP..: 208.98.55.19
>Yes, I know that, I did my homework before suggesting the "fork" :)
Doing some homework could help! Believe me, 'homework' is not enough. ASSP
is too complex, to make fast decisions. It was hard for me to learn this
in nearly two years of development and some thousands hours of thinking,
codin
On 6/15/2009 9:42 AM, Thomas Eckardt/eck wrote:
>> I have to pay attention not to be sucked into inventing everything
>> in V1 again we have already in V2.
> There is nothing more to say.
I'd just like to say that I'm very disappointed that you guys still
haven't been able to implement the 'do my
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>live.com
change it (and all others) to \blive.com
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
roya
>> Yes, I know that, I did my homework before suggesting the "fork" :)
> Doing some homework could help! Believe me, 'homework' is not enough.
> ASSP is too complex, to make fast decisions. It was hard for me to
learn
> this in nearly two years of development and some thousands hours of
> thinking
>uhm... just an idea; maybe a crazy one, but since we're at it...
Not so crazy - we have to write one line to a file per blocked mail, the
same like in the LOG, so we have not to change too much code in
Blockreports. We need some code to rotate the blockreport.log and to
mainten the count of fi
>> uhm... just an idea; maybe a crazy one, but since we're at it...
> Not so crazy - we have to write one line to a file per blocked mail,
the
> same like in the LOG, so we have not to change too much code in
> Blockreports. We need some code to rotate the blockreport.log and to
> mainten the coun
Paul Houlbrooke wrote:
> ASSP seems to be passing DoNoSpoofing messages through to my SMTP server
> and not scoring/blocking them anymore. I have DoNoSpoofing set to score
> but in the ASSP log all I see is the connection/disconnection. This is
> similar to the issue I was having with collecting
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>
> change it (and all others) to \blive.com
>
I'm going to assume that I should only have to do this to the ones that
are actual domain names. There are others that are not (ie: national
aeronautics and space association, spamhaus logistics corp., tiny
software cr, s.r.o
1.5.1.4(0.0.01) is crashing almost immediately after starting up on
Windows. Nothing note worthing in the logs.
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that en
On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:21 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> I put the fork in 1.5.1.4. It is a trial balloon.
Thank you Fritz, I will test this shortly. Is 1.5.1.4 development
only, what is your next planned version for an official non
development release in the 1.5 series?
--
Scott * If you con
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>1.5.1.4(0.0.01) is crashing almost immediately after starting up on
>Windows. Nothing note worthing in the logs.
Did you see this:
Jun-15-09 19:52:03 Starting GenerateBlockReports subtask
Jun-15-09 19:52:03 Ending GenerateBlockReports subtask
-
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> 1.5.1.4(0.0.01) is crashing almost immediately after starting up on
>> Windows. Nothing note worthing in the logs.
>
> Did you see this:
>
> Jun-15-09 19:52:03 Starting GenerateBlockReports subtask
> Jun-15-09 19:52:03 Ending
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
> Is 1.5.1.4 development
>only, what is your next planned version for an official non
>development release in the 1.5 series?
All versions which are not on SF are development. I removed the
subtasking because there was a report in windows, that the serv
28 matches
Mail list logo
