Trevor,
I’m assuming we’re still talking about your OSX box
Do lsof –i | grep 465
This will tell you which program is listening on port 465 ;-)
Steve
(if it’s windows, netstat –abn, linux is netstat –apn)
On 28/07/2009 23:41, "Trevor Jacques" wrote:
I have seen several of these come
Thomas,
I would question the wisdom of doing it this way. Lots of system
checks/anti hacking software will complain about these files ( on the
theory that it's not possible for a file to have a created/modified
date in the future).
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On 29.07.2009, at 8:55, "Thomas
The past version of ASSP 1 and 2 where deleting unneeded files in spam
folder. But since we have Blockreports and the option to request a resend
of any blocked email, such files should be deleted a later time. So
rebuildspamdb is setting the file date of such .eml files to a date in
future and
You may set for example 'debugIP' and/or 'SSLdebug' to any level higher
than 0 .
Thomas
Patrick Neill
28.07.2009 23:17
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Kopie
Thema
[Assp-test] debug SSL connections
After an (unsuccessful) test o
After an (unsuccessful) test of SSL a couple of months ago I decided to give
the latest 2.0 version a try. It appears to be working with some hosts, but
not with all. In particular our main ISP is having difficulties delivering
E-Mail to ASSP. One of their servers works, while the other doesn't. I
The dates of files the latest version of ASSP stores in the 'Spam' folders on
a Windows system are suddenly wrong. Now it is July 28, 2009 but ASSP
somehow manages to store files with a date of September 26, 2009.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/filedates-in-Spam-folder-su
I have seen several of these come in in the past (not just this sender):
Return-Path:
Received: from mymxserver.com ([unix socket])
by mymxserver.com (Cyrus v2.3.8-OS X Server 10.5: 9G69) with
LMTPA;
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:32:48 -0400
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3
Received: from lo
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>When a Black regex evaluates to to true, ASSP is
>using baysValencePB instead of blocking as expected.
Please show the log for an example.
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the rep
