Hello
latest 2 or 3 weeks I tested google public DNS
http://code.google.com/intl/it/speed/public-dns/
(configured in /etc/resolv.conf) and they are working very well , I
definitely removed openDNS.
Graziano
>
>>> With openDNS
>>> 1) Must have an opeDNS account
>>> 2) Possible TOS violati
My strongest and sincerest appologies then. I was indeed careful in
reading your post, taking into account language barrier issues.
Apparently this was all joking. My bad and I hope you accept my
appology.
We may not agree on the openDNS issue, which is fine, debate is always
healthy and ho
>> With openDNS
>> 1) Must have an opeDNS account
>> 2) Possible TOS violations
>
> Why do you repeat this incorrect info?
cuz it's correct :) !
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take
>*Reference to my hero R. Feynman
i**2=-1 (shows how small we are)
"Fritz Borgstedt"
19.12.2009 18:43
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
ASSP development mailing list
Kopie
Thema
Re: [Assp-test] Please help me understand the version 1 versus version2
roadma
Sco
Appology accepted.
And please accept my appology for the wording of the question. Being a
native Englishman, who has never been in the military (for whatever
reason... either by choice, or by required National Service), I was
using a normal everyday phrase which I saw nothing wrong with, but
Scott Haneda wrote:
Seriously, just swap neat with rape and molest while you are at it an
toss in some evil dictator references while we are at it.
I was not planning to comment this rant, but it seems there is so much
ignorance about a running gag with loaded questions, that I have to
explain,
On 19 Dec 2009 at 6:06, Scott Haneda wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2009, at 12:54 AM, Paul Whelan wrote:
>
> >> With openDNS
> >> 1) Must have an opeDNS account
> >> 2) Possible TOS violations
> >
> > Why do you repeat this incorrect info?
>
> Please explain how it is incorrect?
> 1) If you do not, DNS r
On 19 Dec 2009 at 6:17, Scott Haneda wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2009, at 12:42 AM, Paul Whelan wrote:
>
> > On 18 Dec 2009 at 14:02, Scott Haneda wrote:
> >
> >> You did nothing wrong. It's a problem with this community. One that
> >> rarely anyone will acknowledge.
> >
> > Hey, only problem seem to me
Hi all,
changed in 2.0.1_RC0.6.21
- NotifyRe now accepts to define comma separated recipients in every regex
line - for example:
warning:=>us...@yourdomain.com,us...@yourdomain.com
If such recipients are defined, this will override the default recipients
in 'Notify' for this entry.
- If 'Em
On Dec 19, 2009, at 12:42 AM, Paul Whelan wrote:
> On 18 Dec 2009 at 14:02, Scott Haneda wrote:
>
>> You did nothing wrong. It's a problem with this community. One that
>> rarely anyone will acknowledge.
>
> Hey, only problem seem to me that a small number of folks overreact.
I think you are miss
On Dec 19, 2009, at 12:54 AM, Paul Whelan wrote:
>> With openDNS
>> 1) Must have an opeDNS account
>> 2) Possible TOS violations
>
> Why do you repeat this incorrect info?
Please explain how it is incorrect?
1) If you do not, DNS requests will be altered, not good for MTA's
2) The use of word "Po
The way I have my system set is no email is ever deleted/blocked
(requested by IT Director)..
We use 2 spam systems, SpamBorona (a Russian AntiSpam system, and
ASSP) and Exhange 2007 (all spam filters in Exchange are disabled). We
have no control of the setup of SpamBorona (installed and con
Sorry Max, but this is unclear to me!
If a user wants to send a 'notspam report' he/she has to open/click/select
(what ever) that mail. And even if assp will be able to resend on a
notspam report, the user will get the same mail.
>he/she wouldn't have to search the whole spam folder
>looking f
On 12/19/2009 12:29 PM, Thomas Eckardt/eck wrote:
> Why should we resend a mail on a notspam report, that was already
> delivered (even as spam)? Or I'm missunderstanding something?
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
Thanks for your answers,
I was thinking it might be useful when bayes was in testmode and al
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Why should we resend a mail on a notspam report, that was already
>delivered (even as spam)? Or I'm missunderstanding something?
>
>Thomas
If you use copyspam, you may send a report to notspam based solely on
the copy in "sendallspam".
The user did not r
Why should we resend a mail on a notspam report, that was already
delivered (even as spam)? Or I'm missunderstanding something?
Thomas
Max
19.12.2009 12:21
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Kopie
Thema
[Assp-test] Resend mails automatica
Hi!
I think this is not possible right now with the current RC.
Wouldn't this be a very useful feature?
What do you think?
Thanks!
Max
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantag
On 18 Dec 2009 at 23:38, Scott Haneda wrote:
> With openDNS
> 1) Must have an opeDNS account
> 2) Possible TOS violations
Why do you repeat this incorrect info?
paul
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon D
On 18 Dec 2009 at 14:02, Scott Haneda wrote:
> You did nothing wrong. It's a problem with this community. One that
> rarely anyone will acknowledge.
Hey, only problem seem to me that a small number of folks overreact.
Don't lose sight of the fact that many contributors here are non-
native
On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Grayhat wrote:
>> My results are different and I DO testing. The big cache is the
>> strongest point in favor of OpenDNS and GoogleDNS. The Benchmark
>> Utility may bring you some surprises.
>
> The "big cache" may also become a "big headache" :) and I'm not
> kidding,
On Dec 7, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Grayhat wrote:
>> May be. But may be I am in a mailing list of ASSP which happens to
>> have a DNS section where you can add DNS servers.
>> And for that you can use the DNS Benchmark Utility we are discussing.
>> We have several thousands of ASSP installations, many of
21 matches
Mail list logo
