Hi
using a chatGPT API Perl module (
https://dev.to/davorg/writing-a-cpan-module-that-talks-to-chatgpt-gb5 ) with
ASSP
to check every single email (chatgpt plus account should be required) could be
an idea ?
Graziano
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp
Hi
I have this issue too , using
Centos 7.9 , Perl 5.36.0 , ASSP b22293
however apparently all is working ok in ASSP (all DNS checks are working)
Hi all,
I'm running ASSP on CENTOS 7, with Perl 5.30.1. I recently upgraded from b22137
to b22318.
Shortly afterwards, I'm seeing a new error fro
I would never read this, without words, thank you for all Fritz Borgstedt .
Graziano
--
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ brows
?
Thank you
Graziano
--
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your
also MessageScoringLocal is selected (I specified it in my first post)
MessageScoringLocal:=1
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> MessageScoring is already set to Blocking .
> I wrote "
MessageScoring is already set to Blocking .
MessageScoring Upper Limit is set to 45 , so with a bayesian 500 the local
email should be blocked,
(I set bayslocalValencePB 500)
As I can remember this was working with older ASSP versions , now it's not more
working (no block)
Graziano
&
sender
Thank you
Graziano
--
Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest.
Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game
on Steam. $5K
] 173.213.65.248 to:
g...@oj.com [spam found][blocked] -- SPF fail -- [Are you eligible? find out
now.] -> /usr/local/assp/spam/id-36128-03377.eml;
if ValidateSPF is set to "score" I have zero email blocked with the behavior
above
SPFsoftfail is set t
2.98(13040) works correctly, thank you
Graziano
> Hello
>
> recently using rebuildspamdb 2.9.4.0 (1.0.01) in various servers I have seen
> this behavior executing it
>
> Maxbytes:
> Maxfiles:
>
> rebuildspamdb is not able to extract values from assp.cfg , so using nu
good .
I replicate the issue in various perl versions, which could be the cause ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
and get the
Hello Fritz
I have seen in 1.9.8.4 delaySpamLovers has been removed.
It was useful to enable/disable delaying for email or domain , a lot of people
is asking it.
Currently I can't see a way to enable delaying per email/domain as before. Any
chance to have it again ?
Gra
indeed X-Assp-Envelope-From: is empty
is it a good/bad idea to show in ASSP log the From: value in case of the
envelope sender is not specified/empty ?
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list schrei
> bt:
>> From: "Email Marketing"
>
>
> ASSP shows the envelop
header the from is clearly specified for example for the email
above it was the following
From: "Email Marketing"
Thank you
Graziano
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover al
Hello
will 5.10 be strictly required , or the usage of an old perl (5.8) will cause
only limitation
to some new feature ?
Thank you
Graziano
> After 6 years we will require Perl 5.10 instead of Perl 5.8. Starting
> with 1.9.8 (devel
indeed the email contains this string with local
"one choice for locals looking"
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list schrei
> bt:
>> /usr/local/assp/okmail/S
>
>
> Forget my first respone.
>
> There is a cosmetic bug, because ASSP is see
not local , why ASSP is
passing the email with [LocalOK] ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and
in my whitelist I have some row like this
i...@domainc.om,em...@domaina.com^1332743748
so I was thinking this possibility was added (at least for email)
Regarding blacklist is honored by ASSP a row like this in persblack
domainb.com,*@mypoints.com^B1332743748
Graziano
> There is no perso
*@mypoints.com,domaina.com^1332743748
will be accepted ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT man
Hello
I noticed that the email in /spam folder ASSP replaces the From in the email
with the Return Path.
That is confusing to some, is there any ASSP setting to avoid this ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
Live Security Virtual
I checked now and the email below are in whitelist now . As it seems the
email/domain reported
using assp-white@ are not added instantly to the whitelist file .
Please after which event or time the email/domain are added to whitelist file ?
Thank you
Graziano
> Hello
>
> I am trying
: whitelist addition: *@adlinkd.it;
Jun-28-12 08:42:50 Email: whitelist addition: *@adlinke.net;
If I check the /usr/local/assp/whitelist file there is not trace of
*@adlinkd.it and *@adlinke.net
Thank you
Graziano
--
Live
with 1.9.x ASSP seems to run correctly also with 1.68 , however it crashes with
1.70
> Thomas Thats great but what about 1.9.x users?
>
> On May 9, 2012, at 2:37 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> before you upgrade IO::Socket::SSL to a version higher than 1.66 you must
>> upgrade ASSP
ional functionality
was added to SSL_version so that it now needs to check the syntax and
rejects bad values.
You might fix the issue for you if you delete any references to SSL_version
from assp/assp.pl"
Thank you
Graziano
> to fix the issue I installed IO::Socket:SSL 1.68 from the s
installed;
and it starts correctly !? (really weird)
Graziano
> Hello
>
> with IO::Socket::SSL module version 1.70 ASSP fails with this error
>
> invalid SSL_version specified at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/SSL.pm line 308
>
> Using 1.9.6.9(0.0.04)
&
Hello
with IO::Socket::SSL module version 1.70 ASSP fails with this error
invalid SSL_version specified at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/SSL.pm line 308
Using 1.9.6.9(0.0.04)
I tried disabling TLS (enableSSL=0) but ASSP refuses to start .
Graziano
)
In this case , if BayesLocal is enabled and some email or domain are entered in
yesBayesian_local,
the BayesLocal will be applied only for this list . Probably is more useful
than having current
noBayesian_local .
Graziano
Hello
when I send request to assp-white@ I receive an email with an empty body
message.
I have seen the problem also using assp-spam@ .
Thank you
Graziano
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event
rdless of their
frequency will be used to validate incoming addresses. Note:
LocalAddresses_Flat or DoLDAP or DoVRFY must be enabled. "
Thank you
Graziano
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the
The problem fixed itself after today I applied an EXIM upgrade , even if it's
weird since with older
ASSP versions 1.8.1.7(0.0.00) and older it was working .
Graziano
> I tried older ASSP versions and I found this
>
> current version 1.9 does not work
> ...
> ... o
version which passes the email below is 1.8.5.9(0.0.06) .
After 1.8.5.9(0.0.06) there is NO ASSP version
which is able to pass the email below to MTA .
Graziano
> also using noprocessing I can't find a way to pass this email to MTA .
> i...@jancr.com and ro...@ciam.com are local email
also using noprocessing I can't find a way to pass this email to MTA .
i...@jancr.com and ro...@ciam.com are local email . The email is sent using a
Miva web form .
If I disable ASSP , the email is processed by EXIM with no problem at all .
Graziano
> same problem with latest 1.9.6.
same problem with latest 1.9.6.7(0.0.06)
Graziano
> Hello
>
> using 1.9.6.5(0.0.05)
>
> The email below (local good email) is going in black hole , never reaches MTA
> and disconnects after 0 seconds (?).
> .dat is allowed in GoodAttach
>
> Apr-13-12 11:55:45
A size: 48.04
kByte;
Apr-13-12 11:55:45 id-33433-00011 127.0.0.1 to: ro...@ciam.com
disconnected (0 seconds);
Thank you
Graziano
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Te
ok I understood thank you all.
( probably is a good idea to underline in the noProcessingIPs description that
noProcessingIPs
are not honored if the ip are listed in denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways ) .
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list schrei
> bt:
>> For example the l
also denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways .
using ASSP 1.9.6.x
Graziano
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>
>> Could it be possible to have the behavior above also for
> denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways , or at least for ips listed in
>> whiteListedIPs, noProcessingIPs ?
> It is possible
listed in
whiteListedIPs, noProcessingIPs ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http:
Hello
today I found a localdomain (domain listed in localdomains) listed in
DomainBoxLimit (probably added because the domain sent spoofed email ?).
Could be avoided this behavior (having a localdomain added in DomainBoxLimit) ?
Thank you
Graziano
in myServerRe I have a list (txt file) of local server ip addresses . In each
list there are different ips .
The problem should not be in myServerRe , probably a duplicate in localdomains
I will see .
> ASSP development mailing list schrei
> bt:
>> and ASSP is reporting ForgedHELO:'www3.serv
Apr-04-12 10:51:01 id-33352-36648 [ForgedHELO] 176.9.71.162
to: ho...@account2.st [spam found][blocked] --
ForgedHELO:'www3.server.st' -- [Kündigung UPC];
Thank you
Graziano
--
Better than sec? Nothing is bet
--80adjztkde5i.xn;
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list schrei
> bt:
>> Mar-28-12 20:43:50 id-33295-00995 [RelayAttempt] 193.200.173.218> shram.kiev.ua> relay attempt blocked for:
>> a.ignat...@xn--80adjztkde5i.xn;
>>
>> now returned
correction , now in 1.9.6.6 the email are passing to EXIM (even if I do not
understand why ASSP does not apply spam filters)
Graziano
> in ASSP 1.9.6.6 the email still does not pass
>
> Apr-03-12 12:37:55 id-33346-00010
> 189.57.226.86 info:
> found message size announceme
in ASSP 1.9.6.6 the email still does not pass
Apr-03-12 12:37:55 id-33346-00010 189.57.226.86
info: found message size
announcement: 55.25 kByte;
Apr-03-12 12:39:42 id-33346-00010 189.57.226.86
to: t...@myemail.com
disconnected ;
Graziano
> Hello
>
> a weird behavior in 1.9.
yemail.com
disconnected (1333409587 seconds);
the email never reaches the customer inbox. Also I dont understand those
1333409587 seconds .
Thank you
Graziano
--
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
moni
Hello
a russian admin reported me that the problem with xn--80adjztkde5i.xn which was
fixed some week ago
Mar-28-12 20:43:50 id-33295-00995 [RelayAttempt] 193.200.173.218
relay attempt blocked for:
a.ignat...@xn--80adjztkde5i.xn;
now returned in 1.9.6.4(0.0.03)
Graziano
nored ?
I have also
maxBayesValues 45
baysProbability 0.6
baysConf 0
(Also the nospamtag after an email blocked in this way has been reported not
working) .
Graziano
--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows
o Message-Score: added 48 for Bayesian Probability:
1.0, total score for this message is now 56;
Mar-27-12 11:57:11 id-33284-03343 [MessageScore] 67.228.50.51
to:
andreas.phili...@cubu.ro [spam found][blocked] -- totalscore(56) over
MessageScoringUpperLimit -- [Anuntu
de to older ASSP
version and
the problem is the same. Even if ASSP is reporting all perl modules are
installed ,
I think there should be some perl issue in the server.
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> file:files/relayhosts
>
> Where did you put that file de
r ASSP generates this error . Could it due to some perl
module not working correctly ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazu
ok trying newer
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> If I use MaxWhitelistDays to have the whitelist smaller with a low
>> value I risk to remove from whitelist some email
>> which were entered using email interface, and I want avoid this.
>
&g
MaxWhitelistDaysLimit) ,
reduced risk to have a spammer in whitelist file, a more efficient whitelist
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> These are all spammer which where is some mailing list , and were
>> automatically added to whitelist
>>
, should go in
/usr/local/assp/whitelist
however this email contacts should not be 100% white such as surewhitelist ,
these could be scored with a negative score , i.e. -20
What do you think ?
Graziano
--
This SF
lean...@motup.com.br'
- failed localpart check;
Thank you
Graziano
--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
in noLogLineRe I have default
max errors|collect
now I set it to empty , I will see
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> my fault , sorry!. I checked the email headers for some email and
>> there was always a logic explanation ,
>> whitelistdb (even if
my fault , sorry!. I checked the email headers for some email and there was
always a logic explanation ,
whitelistdb (even if it's strange these email are in whitelistdb because these
are all spammers) .
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> I can find thes
easily grepping the "disconnected (1 seconds)" rows . These
are going in inbox and very often are spam.
Graziano
> BTW ASSP is filtering email in this server , I counted 11764 email blocked in
> current log .
> However there is a low amount of email which is passing w
BTW ASSP is filtering email in this server , I counted 11764 email blocked in
current log .
However there is a low amount of email which is passing with no check at all .
npsize is set to 50 , so the email in the example below should be processed.
Graziano
> Hello
>
> I have a serve
used in other servers , however I am not experiencing
the issues of this server.
Graziano
--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
ne in securiteinfo.hdb the problem stopped.
Graziano
> Hello
>
> I am receiving various rows with this error
>
> Mar-15-12 08:49:20 FSabort: done Expected 250, got: 451 Temporary local
> problem - please try later;
>
> smtp sessions are increasing (normally 2/3
Hello
I am receiving various rows with this error
Mar-15-12 08:49:20 FSabort: done Expected 250, got: 451 Temporary local problem
- please try later;
smtp sessions are increasing (normally 2/3 now 12 and over)
Graziano
after reading all in Bayesian docs , I can't understand If I have a possibility
to score exactly
baysValencePB value in all situations , I understood there is no way now.
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> even if I received this too
>> Mar-15-12
When I upgraded to 1.9.6.3 I found the value to 0.000
I was thinking it was like having 0 , but it was not .
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> as it seems it's related with Bayesian Confidence Threshold (baysConf)
>
> baysConf is set per default to
...@alia.it
Bayesian Check [scoring:42] - Prob: 0.99976 => spam;
42 instead of 43 with baysConf 0 , baysProbability 0.6 (?)
Graziano
> Hello
>
> Even if I have baysValencePB set to 43 I have my log full of rows like this
>
> Mar-15-12 05:36:59 id-33180-19851 59.95.38.65 to:
for Bayesian Probability: 1.0, total
score for this message is now 97;
why 53 instead of 43 ? Is it due to the new baysProbability ? If yes how should
be set baysProbability to be sure to have always the baysValencePB 43 used.
Thank you
Grazi
he is sending email
correctly
Thank you
Graziano
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - pl
ydomain.com=>-0.5) ; I prefer this way instead to
use 2 separate files
(SpamFriends/spamFoes).
Graziano
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - b
useful to find bottleneck/delay in filter processing , DNS ...
This data could be saved also in stats , to know which is the avg connection
time in server.
Thank you
Graziano
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Usin
Hello
if a domain is listed in DomainBox, the email bounces offering the nospamtag ,
but if the sender resend
using the notspamtag, ASSP does not honor the nospamtag (DomainBox continues to
block the sender). It happens in 1.9.6.2(0.0.04)
Graziano
p.s. I was not able to replicate again the
ian] 98.138.89.233
to: p...@7ffp.com [spam found][blocked] --
Bayesian -- [Ruedas Sillas] -> /usr/local/assp/spam/33112-00222.eml;
such as having DoBayesian:=1 , which could be the cause ?
Graziano
--
Virtualization &
trying it now 0.0.05 .
In 0.0.04 there is a problem with NOTSPAMTAG too.
Even if I set a custom NotSpamTag , SpamError generates the bounced message
replaces NOTSPAMTAG with default 424242 instead of value set in NotSpamTag
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> Wit
.
Graziano
> Set maxRealSizeExternal to a reasonable value.
>
>
> --
> Virtualization& Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
>
I am trying some version ago , exactly the 1.9.5.1(0.0.08) , and it's not
crashing. Also the number
of smtp session decreased from 30-40 to under 15-25 . I will leave it running
some hour.
Graziano
> no , before the error there are email with no attachment. However there is a
) .
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> 192815104 bytes
>
> Did you realize what size the mail here is ?
>
>
> --
> Virtualization& Cloud Management Using Capacity Plann
Hello
I have a server which is crashing and restarting all day with this error
Mar-02-12 14:29:00 Terminating ASSP: mainloop exception: Out of memory during
"large" request for 16781312 bytes, total sbrk() is 192815104 bytes at
/usr/local/assp/assp.pl line 28259.;
am sure the smtp connections is bad , a fast way to block it
immediately could be useful too
Also a button to stop/start the automatic refresh in the smtp connection list
could be useful.
all IMHO
Graziano
>> - could be useful having from contact which are local in
>> "green&quo
ess value to add the ip address in
denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways
Graziano
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses
Hello
when I click maxBayesValues to "reset to default" the value goes to 30 .
However in description I read
Default is '60', minimum is '30'. Which is default 30 or 60 ? Reading the
description I understood
60 is better and it's should be default,
in (i.e. I have gmail,yahoo in noBlackDomain) ?
Graziano
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing c
ct ?
May I block all domain in "show limit box" with a value greater than "n" (I
can't find a way to do it) ?
does CleanPBInterval works also for "Show domain box" and "show limit box" ?
Graziano
--
related ?
Graziano
> Hello
>
> I am testing and using . All is working correctly , however I am experiencing
> issue sending attachments.
> Small attachments (like 1 kb) are sent immediately . Medium attachment (like
> 500 KB) , goes in time out
> 99% of cases . In the email cl
after
this point I wait about 100 seconds and
it goes in timeout . Any idea which could be the cause ?
Graziano
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for
my fault I had PenaltyBox IP Scoring to 0
I set to 10 and It started to fill
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> should I set something to populate
>> /usr/local/assp/pb/pbdb.limit.db ?
>> it's not filling too .
>
> It should fill. It is filling here with 1.9.6.0 (0.0.04)
>
>
>
ok (I understood scoringLimit is pbdb.limit.db)
should I set something to populate
/usr/local/assp/pb/pbdb.limit.db ?
it's not filling too .
using 1.9.6.0(0.0.04)
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> /usr/local/assp/pb/pbdb.domain.db is not filling .
>> Should I enter a 3rd value in +v
' (check returned '43,10')
Graziano
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint,
ok trying 1.9.6.0(0.0.02) now
> (V1)
>
> I have started to implement that approach.
>
> Look for PenaltyBox Database (pbdb), there are two new buttons:
>
> show domains
> show limits
>
>
> Both dbs will add scores and increase a counter for "ScoringLimit" and
> other events which has the third valu
probably it
could be useful.
But using the limits below and using ip blackbox is probably useless
(nothing will go in blackdomains).
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> could you consider a blackbox for domain too ?
>> possible situation : often there are spamme
a blackbox for domain which put
the email in blackdomain after "n" totalized score (similar to blackbox for
ips).
Graziano
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive onlin
the log and the empty logs were caused by bombSubjectRe .
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> In ShowBlackBox I have a long list of ScoringLimit rows
>> like this
>>
>> 109.96.3.2501328081566 1328081570 4 121 109.96.3.250 ScoringLimit
>>
3.250 ScoringLimit
In the line above 121 points were collected using some of the new + ValencePB
options ,
I set in Scoring settings , is it correct ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow
Hello
what do you think to have in addition to maxSMTPdomainIPWL
also a Do Not Limit Different IP numbers For localDomains 0/1 ?
Graziano
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online
Hello
in spamFriends I have
@domain.net=>1.0
in friendsValencePB I have -10
However in log I see this
added 10 for SpamFriends
should it not be -10 ?
Graziano
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDev
I found that puny code can be converted in normal text
http://www.charset.org/punycode.php
so xn8sb1agmz became т-лайн which means T-Online
and if you enter XN--4-8SB1AGM.XN--P1AI in browser it open http://4лайн.рф/
Graziano
> ok , in fact I replied to customer that ASSP allows valid
p-level-domains (currently noprocessing does not
allow them to pass) .
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> Can ASSP allow an email like t...@xn8sb1agmz.xn ?
> "xn" is not
>
>
>
email like t...@xn8sb1agmz.xn ?
Graziano
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL -
using 1.9.5.9(0.0.01) , now 42|0 is accepted
184.154.137.1141326745348 1326745350 3 43 184.154.137.114 ScoringLimit
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> However this way seems to be complicated
&
uld accept i.e. in a file
baysValencePB
blValencePB
and so on .
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> And could be possible to decide what should be collected in BlackBox?
>> For example I would collect only
>> MessageScoring|InvalidAddress|MissingMXA|ForgedHEL
thank you trying latest now (trying also spamFriends and spamFoes)
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> And could be possible to decide what should be collected in BlackBox?
>> For example I would collect only
>> MessageScoring|InvalidAddress|Missing
I didn't know them; however the BlackRe trick seems to be better to me because
you can set a customized +/- per each domain, while friendsValencePB
and foesValencePB can have only 1 value common to all domains.
Graziano
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> In this
eactivated.
equal does not seem to be accepted .
Graziano
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Each email sent to domainb.com BlackRe will add 5
points to total score
(so it's like having a MessageScoringUpperLimit 50 for domainb.com).
In this way you can have customized MessageScoringUpperLimit per domain limits
, I am experimenting this from
some week for few domains and it seems to
testing
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> Could be possible to collect in BlackBox all the ips which surpassed
>> the MessageScoring Upper Limit too ?
> -> msValencePB
>
>
> --
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Mar 2
1 - 100 of 285 matches
Mail list logo
