Good points. Something to add:
I've been Googling "ASSP" and related words. I am finding discussions
regarding ASSP with skepticism of the volume and load that can be
handled. Is anyone here adept at performing some benchmark testing, or
does anyone have any real-world high-volume stats they ca
What is your perl version? Newer versions of assp need
version 5.8.x.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph
ArmstrongSent: 4. august 2006 06:26To: Questions and
Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP ProxySubject: Re:
[Assp-user] Web admin
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>What causes this? The subject is not blank.
Remove your empty Blackre File Definition.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join Sourc
James,
Thanks, yes, I do.
The permissions are correct.
- Original Message -
From:
James
Brown
To: Questions and Answers for users
of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 1:46
PM
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Web admin
interface
Do you h
Do you have an Images folder in your ASSP directory?URL is the same.James.On 04/08/2006, at 1:40 PM, Joseph Armstrong wrote: I seem to be having problems connecting to the web admin interface since I updated from v1.1. If I reinstall the old version back, I get my connection again no problems. I h
I seem to be having problems connecting to the web
admin interface since I updated from v1.1.
If I reinstall the old version back, I get my
connection again no problems.
I have done this several times now, each reflecting
the same result.
Have there been any changes that may have affected
t
Sorry.
My RedRE is blank. Should I put in the name of the redre.txt file?
Thanks friend,
C
geniusfreak wrote:
> On 8/3/06, Chris Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It says:
>>
>> Mail Matches Red RE: ' '
>>
>> just like below. I dont' get it.
>>
>> It's something in my redre.txt file?
>>
On 8/3/06, Chris Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It says:
>
> Mail Matches Red RE: ' '
>
> just like below. I dont' get it.
>
> It's something in my redre.txt file?
>
> Thanks!
> C
>
>
> geniusfreak wrote:
> > On 8/3/06, Chris Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> For sure it wasn't.
> >>
It says:
Mail Matches Red RE: ' '
just like below. I dont' get it.
It's something in my redre.txt file?
Thanks!
C
geniusfreak wrote:
> On 8/3/06, Chris Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> For sure it wasn't.
>>
>> I replaced it with the default regex ASSP has and restarted assp and no
On 8/3/06, Chris Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> For sure it wasn't.
>
> I replaced it with the default regex ASSP has and restarted assp and now see
> it as having a red re:
>
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> In analyzer I see this:
>
>
>
> Mail matches Red RE: ''
What exactly is in th
The x where emails, so I x'd them out.. sorry if it caused
any confusion.
Best,
C
Chris Norman wrote:
> For sure it wasn't.
>
> I replaced it with the default regex ASSP has and restarted assp and
> now see it as having a red re:
>
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> In analyzer I see th
For sure it wasn't.
I replaced it with the default regex ASSP has and restarted assp and
now see it as having a red re:
Thanks,
Chris
In analyzer I see this:
Mail matches Red RE: ''
has a greylist value of 0.857609 (adds 0.857609 0.857609)
Chris,
Check your BlackRe (Expression to Identify Spam*) and make sure it's not blank.
Blank RegEx strings can cause issues sometimes.
Kevin
On 8/3/06, Chris Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see this in my log:
>
> Jul-29-06 10:05:29 xx.xx.xx.xx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bl
I see this in my log:
Jul-29-06 10:05:29 xx.xx.xx.xx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Black
RE: ''
What causes this? The subject is not blank.
Ideas?
C
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join S
I don't think CVS (or SVN) plays much of a role here.
Having it on sf.net is generally a good thing. If new releases had been
announced on freshmeat, that would reflect an active project as well.
The page http://freshmeat.net/projects/assp/ has not been updated for
over 2 years.
I guess a faceli
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>Therefore, I'm trying to
>figure out if there is a con to not configuring ClamAV
>on ASSP and turing off the ClamWinAV configured on
>hMailServer. I believe the pro of my configuration is
>that spam is first filtered and I'm
http://www.pointdee.co.uk/assp-wiki/index.php?title=Headers_and_Body
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business
The (*major*) con is that the definition file format for ClamAV changed
and ASSP is not compatible with the current format used - and hasn't
been in a very long time.
I suggest you use another mail-hop for AV processing or use a product
integrated with your MTA.
Martin Ying wrote:
> I'm using
I'm using a mail server (hMailServer) with ClamWinAV
integration. I already have the integration
configured and working. Therefore, I'm trying to
figure out if there is a con to not configuring ClamAV
on ASSP and turing off the ClamWinAV configured on
hMailServer. I believe the pro of my configu
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP was uploaded to CVS starting with version 1.0.12 (after Hanna
> left the Project).
> Hanna himself never used CVS.
>
While thats true, that doesn't mean it isn't an issue that effects the
visibility of ASSP as an Open Source project. I am only making
parallels t
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>
>...and how obvious is it to determine where the work is actually be
>done - and more importantly, why is it being done off-site? All
>these details are difficult to determine, and easily overlooked.
ASSP was uploaded to CV
Thanks Travis. I'll review it this afternoon and give my editor a
chance to look it over this afternoon as well. I'll post it to the Wiki
this evening.
Travis Forghani wrote:
> I have completed the rough draft of the quick start guide. There are no
> Unix instruction as I know very little ab
I have completed the rough draft of the quick start guide. There are no
Unix instruction as I know very little about Unix. I will send the
Quick Start Guide to Micheal. He will handle posting it to the wiki. I
will continue to work on it as needed.
--
sincerely,
Travis Forghani
IT Adminis
($.02 disclaimer)
Most likely its because of the nature of how it is presented. The site
and documentation are unorganized, as is the development.
The actual development and work has been excellent in my opinion, but
that is not obvious to the casual observer who looks at the SF site and
see
Documentation! But that is about to change.
sincerely,
Travis Forghani
IT Administrator
Bowman Enterprises, Inc.
Cell: 919-795-9298
Office: 919-894-3662, Ext. 34
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
I just don’t get it…
Every IT pro I know that has tried ASSP
fall in love with it! I’ve heard horrible reviews about some of those
below…
I just can’t understand why ASSP isn’t
more popular…
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickson, Paul
Sent: Thu
Attached is the updated version of the Email Interface How To for users doc.
--
sincerely,
Travis Forghani
IT Administrator
Bowman Enterprises, Inc.
Cell: 919-795-9298
Office: 919-894-3662, Ext. 34
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whic
I figured the notes below would be good for others to consider since
the recent realization of what a redlist actually does.
In the Whitelist Options section option Only the envelope-sender is
added/compared to the whitelist states, "Normal operation includes
addresses in the FROM, SENDER, REP
Fools! All fools!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lars Troen
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006
9:24 AM
To: Questions
and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user]
"Proving which spam filters work Best"
ASSP was no
ASSP was not part of
this test. It seems that only the following programs were
tested:
Annoyance, Antispam,
Bayesspam, bmf, Bogofilter, CRM114, dbacl, DSPAM, lfile, qsf, SpamAssassin,
SpamBayes, SpamOracle and SpamProbe
Lars
-
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Would it be sufficient, to have the redlist doing this or should redre
> doing the same?
That's a great question. I think it would be beneficial to split the
functionality, and have it only effect the redRe. Certainly, and email
addresses can be added to that if absolu
I guess the link would help:)
http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/08/03/0123206.shtml
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickson, Paul
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 8:47 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP
Downloading the presentation now. While I’m hoping he
took a look at ASSP, some how I doubt it. Should be an interesting
presentation none the less.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join Sou
I will adjust appropriately.
sincerely,
Travis Forghani
IT Administrator
Bowman Enterprises, Inc.
Cell: 919-795-9298
Office: 919-894-3662, Ext. 34
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain information that
Alon,
Thank you for the response but we have realized that how I described
the redlist is incorrect.
sincerely,
Travis Forghani
IT Administrator
Bowman Enterprises, Inc.
Cell: 919-795-9298
Office: 919-894-3662, Ext. 34
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message is intended only for the use of the in
Fritz,
Yes, I know that the mail would be saved in the incomingOkMail
directory if it exists and if it doesn't then it wouldn't be saved at
all. Also, did you read the quote I pasted on what I used to think
Redlist functionality was. It would be nice if the Redlist functioned
the way I thou
There is some important functionality missing: version 1.2.x
introduced the combined report. In general, it works as if you send
two reports with one. So you can whitelist by sending a notspam-report
and having set:
Spam/Ham Report & Whitelist Add/Remove
If set Ham Reports will add addresses to t
The verbiage is indeed very clear and
correct.
Although as a rule I don’t send an
explanation email more than 10-15 lines long… some users have a tendency
to ignore or postpone reading these emails.
I usually start out with sending an email explaining
SPAM and NOTSPAM, and even in tha
38 matches
Mail list logo
