Im having problems with asterisk detecting when a calling party through a
PSTN line has hung up. It takes 10 sec for it to finally detect.
Im revieving my service through telus residential line.
i have a SPA-3000 and a wildcard fxo, both behave identical. Ive checked
voltages, everething seems
I use Fedora core 2, and openssl-0.9.7, expat-1.95.7 is installed by rpm packages.
I downloaded pwlib-1.5.2 and openh323-1.12.2 at my home directory(/root/root_src), asterisk 1.0.4 at directory /usr/src/ and have installed successfully.
Asterisk is executed normally, but module
Has anyone any experience of the above.
Key feature for me is tracking incoming and outgoing emails and
linking them to the contact record.
Thanks, sorry for the OT ;-)
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
Hi
Anyone have a hint how to get callers IP-Address from a php-agi script ?
/HH
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 10:44:11AM -0600, Rich Adamson wrote:
I haven't tried to keep track of the code changes involving reloads
(or cli restarts for that matter), but having been around * for a fair
amount of time and having been caught with making changes that have
had no affect, I'll
Does anyone have any experience ith configureing the sangoma A102 card for
testing using a e1 cross cable i've configured and installed the cards
properly even the lights on the card are green which proves that my cross
cable is properly built too. my problem is with asterisk which gives me these
Hi Dean,
What relevance has that to what we were discussing? We were talking
about free form speech to text. That is a world apart from a voice
activated IVR. Besides that, I have never found a voice activated IVR in
English that gets better than about 30% accuracy on a fairly limited
On Sun, February 13, 2005 23:01, Vikram Rangnekar said:
span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3
bchan=1-15
dchan=16
bchan=17-31
span=2,1,0,ccs,hdb3
bchan=32-46
dchan=47
bchan=48-62
At a guess 16,32,48 and 64 are d channels, where as you are telling it to
use b channels for d channels...
--
Best
Here it is:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/ip-phone-7905
software is the same for
7905 / 7912
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Marty Mastera
Envoy: samedi 12
fvrier 2005 18:47
: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
+++ Duane [13/02/05 22:56 +1100]:
On Sun, February 13, 2005 23:01, Vikram Rangnekar said:
span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3
bchan=1-15
dchan=16
bchan=17-31
span=2,1,0,ccs,hdb3
bchan=32-46
dchan=47
bchan=48-62
At a guess 16,32,48 and 64 are d channels, where as you are telling it to
On Sun, February 13, 2005 23:19, Vikram Rangnekar said:
I'm sorry i didnt quite understand what you meant why would i need 4
d-channels i've only used 16 and 47 as my dchannels and want span 1 to
generate the clock for this e1 setup.
As far as I'm aware each E1 has 30 b channels, and 2 d
Duane wrote:
On Sun, February 13, 2005 23:19, Vikram Rangnekar said:
I'm sorry i didnt quite understand what you meant why would i need 4
d-channels i've only used 16 and 47 as my dchannels and want span 1 to
generate the clock for this e1 setup.
As far as I'm aware each E1 has 30 b
Sjaak Nabuurs wrote:
Hello * users
I've problems with sound quality on zaphfc
Asterisk works fine good sound quality.
If I do make load in the bristuf.xx zaphfc dir then sound quality
drops directly.
Even if I don't load the chan_zap in the modules.conf
I use this config on more (even
On 14:46, Sat 12 Feb 05, eric m wrote:
Hi!
I would like to have feedback on wireless (wifi / 802.11b) IP phone to use
with Asterisk PBX. Can you sugest model, The best and also the worst to
use.
Thanks,
eric.
Hi,
I read on sf that the cisco wireless phone is almost 100%
working with
On 10:56, Sun 13 Feb 05, John Middleton wrote:
Has anyone any experience of the above.
Key feature for me is tracking incoming and outgoing emails and
linking them to the contact record.
Thanks, sorry for the OT ;-)
Hi,
Have a look at http://www2.covide.net
Maybe that's what you want.
The
On 21:21, Sat 12 Feb 05, Robert Rozman wrote:
Hi,
could you give some more info about your setup. How do you get 2 fritz cards
working (I thought it works only on 2.4 kernels ) ?
What capi drivers do you use ?
Thanks,
regards,
Rob.
Hi,
I followed the instructions in the wiki to
Steve then you have had your head up your arse for a number of years.
Nuance was delivering 90% in 1999 and I have a number of happy customers
to prove it.
You also obviously didn't look at either the Nuance or angel sites
because both of them offer free form speech to text capabilities.
One of
Steve,
Need to replace our older soho fax machine with something more current.
Would like to run the fax line through *, but haven't been able to
make spandsp work correctly with digium TDM04b card. Our fax volume
This seems to be a problem with the current wctdm driver. It seems to be
John Middleton wrote:
Has anyone any experience of the above.
Key feature for me is tracking incoming and outgoing emails and
linking them to the contact record.
Thanks, sorry for the OT ;-)
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
Lonnie,
If you look at:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+RealTime
it says that MySQL _is_ supported.
I don't know whether RealTime PostgreSQL, but I can't
upgrade to RealTime anyway ... I need a stable version
of asterisk, and the current stable version does not
include RealTime. :(
I
Thank you for the response ... Nicolas (the author of Flash Panel) had
responded with this too, but you have to be using 0.20-unstable, where as I
was using 0.19-stable.
I have 0.20-unstable running and the park button works for the most part -
seems to stay lit even after parking times out, but
Hi Dean,
You seem to have had your head up the supplier's arse for a number of
years. :-)
I last tried a Nuance demo system in about 2002, and found it useless.
Speechworks (now scansoft) was rather better, but still useless for
English. I'm British. Trying the British system gave poor
Try using context (with a trailing T!!) in your config, and lose the
spaces around the equal sign, just in case.
-Original Message-
From: Wesley Jay Deypalan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 9:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
The limited domain reference is obsolete, Telstra have a 2 million
record database (yeh I know it's a lot smaller when you dice it
phonetically but it's still big enough).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Underwood
Sent: Sunday,
--- Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On February 12, 2005 07:31 pm, Richard Reina wrote:
On thing that is odd is that although the t1 cross
over cable is plugged in to both * and the Adit.
Both
t1 and t1 leds on the Adit are red. How can they
both
have the same status if
On Mon, February 14, 2005 2:18, dean collins said:
The limited domain reference is obsolete, Telstra have a 2 million
record database (yeh I know it's a lot smaller when you dice it
phonetically but it's still big enough).
Maybe it's just me, but I found their database very hit and miss, not
Try using context (with a trailing T!!) in your config, and lose the
spaces around the equal sign, just in case.
Well, I was wondering why the error log showed that the phones where
in default context.
That just show that I should never answer before my first coffee ;-)
Oh yeh, their database admins have been playing funny games with the
rules. It's been demonstrated on more than a few 'key words'
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Duane
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 10:25 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 04:46 +0100, Andres Gmez Garca wrote:
I've tried GNOMEMeeting also. It works fine with a P2P client
connections (ALSA works fine) but, even when I success connecting to an
asterisk server, I haven't hear anything. I mean, I don't hear the demo
successfull messages. I've
Roger Hanson wrote:
I've downloaded 2x and burned 2 cds and get an error invalid
compressed format (err=2) system halted message both times.
It'd be nice to have a MD5 to verify my download is OK. It'd narrow
down the problem to either the download or the burn, wouldn't it?
Here is an
Addendum: I did a little investigation and found this
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=272259
Regards, Bruno.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To
Michiel van Baak wrote:
On 10:56, Sun 13 Feb 05, John Middleton wrote:
Has anyone any experience of the above.
Key feature for me is tracking incoming and outgoing emails and
linking them to the contact record.
Thanks, sorry for the OT ;-)
Hi,
Have a look at http://www2.covide.net
Maybe
beonice wrote:
I don't know whether RealTime PostgreSQL, but I can't
upgrade to RealTime anyway ... I need a stable version
of asterisk, and the current stable version does not
include RealTime. :(
You need a stable version of Asterisk, but you're willing to patch
with an unsupported change like
On 11:52, Sun 13 Feb 05, Mike Clark wrote:
Michiel van Baak wrote:
On 10:56, Sun 13 Feb 05, John Middleton wrote:
Has anyone any experience of the above.
Key feature for me is tracking incoming and outgoing emails and
linking them to the contact record.
Thanks, sorry for the OT ;-)
Hi Guys,
Ive attempted to get this moh-native thing to work
with no success. Ive reviewed wiki, mantis and e-mail postings and
Im confused.
The latest Ive read is native moh should be in
asterisk-addons in format_mp3, but what version will it work with? Ive
tried asterisk 1.0.1,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I was working yesterday and after I provide my IAXy box it loose any
network comunication, the link light (green) is on and the activity
light (orange) when the power is turned on it does nothing, but
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:58:47 +0100, B. Vallet -
www.acropolistelecom.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it is :
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/ip-phone-7905
software is the same for 7905 / 7912
It's not actually.
Firmware for both versions is available from that page,
El dom, 13-02-2005 a las 16:57 +0100, Bruno Hertz escribió:
Had the same issue with Debian Sarge. I didn't actually investigate it,
but I strongly suspect the openh323/pwlib packages don't work with the
asterisk-h323 package. The H323 README specifically says btw to don't
use the packages of
On 12 Feb 2005, at 19:46, eric m wrote:
Hi!
I would like to have feedback on wireless (wifi / 802.11b) IP phone to
use
with Asterisk PBX. Can you sugest model, The best and also the worst
to
use.
I've been using the Zyxel P2000 for a month or so now.
I was going to deploy several of them around
How do you make SIP work behind NAT without having to change anything on the
firewall for example, those cable modems
So far, Ive tested this using softphones and only iaxphone has been able to
work using IAX, eye lite or something for FWD that uses SIP says it cant
connect to the provider...
We got also these problems and where searching like fools for solutions
... until the time we changed the main board of the server! (Interrupt
sharing or Hyper threading stuff, I don't remember) we replaced the
Supermicro board with an intel.
Try the same config on another machine (maybe an
On 04:06, Mon 14 Feb 05, Shaun Ewing wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:58:47 +0100, B. Vallet -
www.acropolistelecom.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it is :
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/ip-phone-7905
software is the same for 7905 / 7912
When I go to that url
Yes, but I have to configure a route for each host in every host! A the
moment i have about 120 Asterisk hosts and every astersk have about
50-100 users! Is for that I want a single sip proxy that route dial.
I read more about ser, and the suggestion is to use ser for accounting
and route, and
Guys.. which ATA is better for connecting analog phones (features,
stability, experiences, etc)?
Sipura 2000 or Handy Tone 286, etc?
What are you experiences?
__
Anton Krall
___
Rich Adamson wrote:
Steve,
Need to replace our older soho fax machine with something more current.
Would like to run the fax line through *, but haven't been able to
make spandsp work correctly with digium TDM04b card. Our fax volume
This seems to be a
So, which way to go? IAX or SIP? IAXy or Sipura?
I prefer by far IAX
All ip phones use SIP right?
Nope, now there's IAX hardphone, like there : http://www.iaxtalk.com/
hth
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Brian Buhrow wrote:
Hello. You can't have two phones login with the same extension. You
need to assign one phone to 101, and the other to 102. Set the user to 101
on one and 102 on the other.
Actually, that isn't quite 100% accurate.
The more accurate statement
Forrest W. Christian wrote:
Actually, that isn't quite 100% accurate.
And even yours wasn't 100% accurate. Instead of messy extension lines
you could setup a Queue as well.
Flexibility, this is why Asterisk rules!
Jeremy McNamara
___
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
Hello,
I understand that only the destination of a call should do jitter
buffering. So, if IAX2/PhoneA calls IAX2/PhoneB through my server (no
transfers), PhoneA and PhoneB need to perform their own jitter buffering,
and Asterisk will
I found out the CD's I made were OK - I used one on a different computer
and it worked fine.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't like the current Asterisk box I'm using now. It's
an IBM Netfinity 3500 - dual 233MHz processor, SCSI, 512MB, DVD-ROM,
blah,
blah. That's the only computer I get the error
Anton Krall wrote:
Guys.. which ATA is better for connecting analog phones (features,
stability, experiences, etc)?
Sipura 2000 or Handy Tone 286, etc?
What are you experiences?
In my experience the Sipura 2000 has three hardware advantages:
* 2 independent phone ports
* Mounting holes
* The
Hi,
I am thinking of purchasing a cheap Dlink VPN for
testing purposes for use with my Asterisk box and would like to ask the list for
advice on how to pick a VPN that will work with my box. I am a newbie to both
VPN's and Asterisk so any advice will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Mike
The Sipuras have a ton of configurable parameters. If you understand
them (and there is no good manual, unfortunately) then you can be of
great benefit. Otherwise they'll be worthless. I particularly miss the
dial-plan, distinctive ring and audio gain options on the
Grandstreams. Remote syslog can
Heh. Good point, Kevin. I didn't realise that ast_data
was also a third party add-on. :)
So I submitted a bug report to digium with my gdb
trace
(http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0003580),
and markster there suggested that I should update to
the latest stable asterisk from CVS. I
On 19:36, Sun 13 Feb 05, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
Michiel van Baak schrieb:
On 04:06, Mon 14 Feb 05, Shaun Ewing wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:58:47 +0100, B. Vallet -
www.acropolistelecom.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it is :
Good evening,
allow me to join in right here. Which ATA/TA would you
suggest for connecting analogue fax machines to Asterisk?
One of the ones named before or e.g. a ATA-186 made by Cisco?
Cheers
Sascha
The Sipuras have a ton of configurable parameters. If you understand
them (and there is no
Thanks to everyone who responded. I submitted a bug
report to digium
(http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0003580),
and markster responded, suggesting that I get an
updated version of stable asterisk from CVS. I did,
and now it's all working fine. I must have initially
downloaded a
Sascha E. Pollok wrote:
Good evening,
allow me to join in right here. Which ATA/TA would you
suggest for connecting analogue fax machines to Asterisk?
One of the ones named before or e.g. a ATA-186 made by Cisco?
At the moment I am deploying Grandstream ATAs for faxing machines with
out a problem
Hi,
I plan to install asterisk and connect it to telco
through ISDN in China.
I'd love to know if the ISDN standard in China has any
difference than in America before I buy the digium
card.
anybody has experience in it? or anybody who installed
asterisk with ISDN in asia can share their
-Original Message-
From: Luki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Sipuras have a ton of configurable parameters. If you
understand them (and there is no good manual, unfortunately)
Really? 87 pages aren't enough for you?
http://www.sipura.com/Documents/SipuraSPAUserGuidev2.0.9.pdf
Hi list!
I'm not getting incoming CallerID in The Netherlands on my TDM11B.
Everything was configures according to the docs at digium.com.
The error on the console is this:
Feb 13 16:49:40 ERROR[16123]: callerid.c:260 callerid_feed: fsk_serie made
mylen 0 (-84)
Feb 13 16:49:40 WARNING[16123]:
Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
Yeah, I can't see that working. 0.0.0.0 isn't really an address; more
like a lack of one. That's what's got me wondering about DHCP.
The IAXy does not use DHCP, it uses the older BOOTP protocol. Most
DHCP servers support BOOTP (but it may have to be enabled)
Anton Krall wrote:
How do you make SIP work behind NAT without having to change anything on the
firewall for example, those cable modems
So far, Ive tested this using softphones and only iaxphone has been able to
work using IAX, eye lite or something for FWD that uses SIP says it cant
connect
Michiel van Baak wrote:
On 04:06, Mon 14 Feb 05, Shaun Ewing wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:58:47 +0100, B. Vallet -
www.acropolistelecom.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it is :
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/ip-phone-7905
software is the same for 7905 / 7912
When I go to that url i
Hey guys,
I got moh-native working with todays CVS of asterisk
and asterisk-addons so Im guessing there were some code problems with
versions 1.0.1, 1.0.4 and current CVS stable. Following the wiki
instructions worked fine. Also the mp3s that come with Asterisk
sound perfect, whereas my
Id be grateful if someone could point me in the right
direction.
I have a Broadvoice trunk attached to Asterisk which I use
for frequent calls to the UK
using the following in extensions.conf
exten =
_0[1-68].,1,Ringing
exten =
_0[1-68].,2,Dial(SIP/BV/01144${EXTEN:1})
exten =
On 20:08, Sun 13 Feb 05, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
Michiel van Baak schrieb:
Thnx.
No luck for me I guess.
chan_sccp it will be.
Not for the 79[05|12]... At least my 7905 does not like chan_sccp too
much and they crashed my * (1.0.5)... unless you bounty the chan_sccp
developers for
This seems to be a problem with the current wctdm driver. It seems to
be
broken for audio going out. I used to be able to send faxes reliably
using spandsp and a TDM40P card, but I no longer can. I haven't had
time
to look in detail at what is wrong.
+++ Michael Devenijn [13/02/05 18:23 +0100]:
We got also these problems and where searching like fools for solutions
... until the time we changed the main board of the server! (Interrupt
sharing or Hyper threading stuff, I don't remember) we replaced the
Supermicro board with an intel.
I have set Asterisk as a gateway on the Polycom and set gatekeeper to
"No"
So to dial on the Polycom I would then dial (0+the number). No way to
just dial directly without the 0?
The other side of this is how do I dial "to" the Polycom, I have tried
everything that I can think of for the
I'm running a TDM-400P with 2 x FXS and 2 x
FXO. I'm finding that there seems to be an odd relationship to
sound quality on the card to my local when connecting via a SIP
client.
When I'm on my local network, if I connect to
Asterisk via a SIP client (such as x-pro), and dial an outside
Are there any other relatively low cost analog
cards available? I'm interested in finding something that might work a bit
more reliably than the TDM-400P
regards,
Paul
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
On Feb 12, 2005, at 4:38 PM, Rich Adamson wrote:
For planning purposes, is it appropriate to think in terms of
purchasing
a t38 capable box even if its not supported by * today? (I'm well aware
of the bounty and Steve's work.)
That's what I would do. In fact, I already have T.38 capable VOIP
I'm currently deciding on what card to pruchase for octo/quad BRI card to
use with Asterisk on EuroISDN lines.
I'm aware of at least two options (Junghanns or Beronet), but don't know how
stable and well supported they are. Which ones are better supported ? Any
experiences? Any advice ? How tos ?
Hi,
my success story with the zaphfc incl. florz patch has been to early.
Allthough sound drop outs no longer happen, the following happens after
a longer period (2 days) of inactivity on the asterisk box.
Feb 13 22:30:15 NOTICE[6799]: chan_zap.c:7685 pri_dchannel: PRI got
event: HDLC Abort
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 18:10 +0100, Andres Gmez Garca wrote:
Thanks Bruno, I'll try it.
Also, you might take a look again at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=272259
Following your mail, I wrote to that list (cf the last mails there),
and it looks like a working oh323 package
On 21:47, Sun 13 Feb 05, Vikram Rangnekar wrote:
+++ Michael Devenijn [13/02/05 18:23 +0100]:
We got also these problems and where searching like fools for solutions
... until the time we changed the main board of the server! (Interrupt
sharing or Hyper threading stuff, I don't remember)
Rich Adamson wrote:
<> This seems to be a problem with the
current wctdm driver. It seems to be broken for audio going out. I used
to be able to send faxes reliably using spandsp and a TDM40P card, but
I no longer can. I haven't had time to look in detail at what is wrong.
I'd
I have been playing with asterisk for a couple of weeks now and I
have been very happy with its performance. However, I have run into a
problem with how I want to deploy this solution.
I have a mix of softphones (SJ and Xlite), ATA's, and a couple of IP
phones (Snom 190). The asterisk box
At 03:36 PM 2/13/2005, you wrote:
On 21:47, Sun 13 Feb 05, Vikram Rangnekar wrote:
+++ Michael Devenijn [13/02/05 18:23 +0100]:
We got also these problems and where searching like fools for solutions
... until the time we changed the main board of the server! (Interrupt
sharing or Hyper
It is 0* + number not 0 + number only
other way is to use a gatekeeper and register the asterisk and the polycom to
it..
In my h323.conf
[4500]
type=user
host=10.10.10.59
context=default
in my extensions.conf
[h323]
exten = 4200,1,Dial,H323/10.10.10.49
exten =
http://www.broadbandphone.com.au/global/pnp.htm
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:53:36 +1100, PHP Mechanic wrote:
http://www.broadbandphone.com.au/global/pnp.htm
They look like they are all PA1688 based.
Gary
.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
Additionally when I do receive the unreachable message as soon as I
place an outbound call the peer becomes reachable..
dabigshiznizzle wrote:
I have been playing with asterisk for a couple of weeks now and I
have been very happy with its performance. However, I have run into a
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 10:10, Gary wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:53:36 +1100, PHP Mechanic wrote:
http://www.broadbandphone.com.au/global/pnp.htm
They look like they are all PA1688 based.
The black one is a dead copy of the one sitting on my desk, made by
Hirakawa Electronics according to
Should be a good night - looking forward to seeing some unfamiliar faces!
Regards,
PaulH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jurgen
Sent: Thursday, 10 February 2005 12:55 PM
To: Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
Hi,
Telecoms in China is not based on American standards. It is based on
European standards. IDN in China is exactly the same as ISDN in Europe,
and European configurations on Asterisk will work in China.
Regards,
Steve
Xu, Duo wrote:
Hi,
I plan to install asterisk and connect it to telco
You didn't say what your fxs/fxo requirements are but:
A T1 card ($500) and a used channel bank ($300) might be
a good alternative.
You also might check out the voicetronix cards.
Cheers,
Jon.
On Sunday 13 February 2005 02:55 pm, Paul Fielding wrote:
Are there any other relatively low cost
I spent a bunch of time troubleshooting the SIP end of things, thinking
that's where the
problem was, until I realized that every other SIP
connection I make (from remote) yields a high quality call. ie. I can dial
another SIP
client and maintain high quality audio. Additionally, I can
For planning purposes, is it appropriate to think in terms of
purchasing
a t38 capable box even if its not supported by * today? (I'm well aware
of the bounty and Steve's work.)
That's what I would do. In fact, I already have T.38 capable VOIP
adapter (an Azatel 200) for my current
For whatever it's worth, it was the crossover cable.
--- Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On February 12, 2005 09:21 pm, David Coulson wrote:
If he gets a green light with a loopback plug
wired like that, his
controller is definatly screwed up :-)
1-4
2-5
That was how I
We have had a big success with the Linksys PAP2-NA. 2 FX ports and 1 WAN
port. Only downside is that only 1 call can be using 729 at a time. This has
been confirmed with Linksys. They will be releasing PAP2-NAv2 in March to
overcome this. In the meantime, get a Sipura 2100, supports 2 729 calls
I had the same problems with Tormenta2 card from Digium.
Same behaviour, both cards were receiving irq`s, but when spans got up,
lots of messages (Bad FCS) came up too on my asterisk console...
everything died with kernel panic in the end...
The motherboard was an Asus with dual Pentium3 933MHz,
- Original Message -
From: Jon Gabrielson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You didn't say what your fxs/fxo requirements are but:
A T1 card ($500) and a used channel bank ($300) might be
a good alternative.
Basically my fxs/fxo requirements are the same as my existing TDM-400P ( 2
in 2 out). Just
Pure guess... you're probably bumping into some of the same issues
that many of us TDM users are hitting. Seems like either an interrupt
handling (latency) or pci bus issue. You'll find hundreds of postings
relative to this over the last six months or so. Not everyone has
problems with the TDM,
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
BTW: did I mention that we have binary packages for standard Debian
Sarge kernels in our apt source?
zaptel is the only package that never worked for me from apt-get. I need
to download, compile and install the kernel (specially because the
original debian install is pre
On Feb 12, 2005, at 9:10 PM, Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
Hello,
I understand that only the destination of a call should do jitter
buffering. So, if IAX2/PhoneA calls IAX2/PhoneB through my server (no
transfers), PhoneA and PhoneB need to perform their own jitter
buffering,
and Asterisk will just
Folks,
I recently obtained a Western Electric multi-line phone and am
seeking help with getting this beast working with *.
The interesting stuff in my * implementation consists of a T100P
card, a TDM400P card, and an Adtran TA750 channel bank with three quad-port
FXS modules and
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 08:35:33PM +0100, Michiel van Baak arranged a set of
bits into the following:
On 20:08, Sun 13 Feb 05, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
Michiel van Baak schrieb:
Thnx.
No luck for me I guess.
chan_sccp it will be.
Not for the 79[05|12]... At least my 7905 does not
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:53:36 +1100
From: PHP Mechanic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Who makes these phones?
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
