Re: [asterisk-users] Occasional call from "asterisk"

2011-05-06 Thread Steve Totaro
Telco always says it is not their issue. This is all over google, did you even check? Did you check your options in chan_dahdi.conf? hanguponpolarityswitch=yes I am not sure if that is your problem but it would be helpful to list the things you have found, tested, and ruled out. As for prepend

Re: [asterisk-users] Occasional call from "asterisk"

2011-05-06 Thread Bruce B
Hi Brian, Did you find a solution to your problem? or at least got a working dial-plan for it? I have the same problem again as well and want to know what to do with the dial-plan to off-set the effect at least since Telco says it's not their issue. Regards, Bruce On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:53 PM,

Re: [asterisk-users] Tricky: Progress, Delay, DTMF / background calling

2011-05-06 Thread Markus
On a second thought, I don't need the predetermined delay. I can probably just set that with additional w's in the DialBackground command (which I made up). So rather something like: _X.,1,Progress _X.,2,DialBackground(SIP/123456@provider,,D(ww${EwwXwwTwwEwwN}ww)) _X.,3,ConnectLegs Thank

[asterisk-users] Tricky: Progress, Delay, DTMF / background calling

2011-05-06 Thread Markus
Hi, has the following been done before respectively is it possible with Asterisk? I searched the archives but couldn't locate anything. 1. Call to comes in via SIP. 2. Call is not answered yet but progress continues. 3. At the moment the call comes in something like this gets spawned in the

[asterisk-users] Blacklist with *30

2011-05-06 Thread Alejandro Cabrera Obed
Dear, when I dial *30 in order to get instructions to blacklist an extension, Idon't get the menu but I get a new dial tone. What happen please ??? What can I do to solve this ??? Thanks a lot, Alejandro -- _ -- Bandwidth and C

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8 latest branch safe for production ?

2011-05-06 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 14:13 +, satish patel wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Just wondering is it safe to use asterisk 1.8 latest branch on > > production ? > > > > http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/1.8/ Revision > > 317100 > > > > -S > We've been run

Re: [asterisk-users] Discussion: Are we ready to leave 1.4 behind?

2011-05-06 Thread Ira
At 05:39 AM 5/6/2011, you wrote: Thanks for the feedback, Ira. It makes me very sad to hear what you say and I hope that we can get more resources from the community to assist in the process to make it more friendly. We want to get those bug reports. The one thing I hate to hear when I'm trave

Re: [asterisk-users] Cannot install dahdi-linux on (old) PAE kernel.

2011-05-06 Thread Jason Parker
On 05/06/2011 01:30 PM, Bob Beers wrote: Not sure if this will work, but I'd try adding, before line 86: #Workaround for PAE %if "%{paevar}" == "PAE" Provides: kmod-dahdi-linux %endif Can't actually test it myself, sorry. - Bob You'd probably want to modify the kmodtool that comes with it,

Re: [asterisk-users] question on ways to activate voicemail light on polycom

2011-05-06 Thread Watkins, Bradley
> The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immed

Re: [asterisk-users] Supermicro X7SPE (Atom) as Asterisk server?

2011-05-06 Thread Andrew Latham
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Vahan Yerkanian wrote: > Has anyone used this board as an Asterisk server? > http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPE.cfm?typ=H&IPMI=Y > > I'm mostly interested about the possible compatibility issues this board may > have with the AEX800 card.

[asterisk-users] Supermicro X7SPE (Atom) as Asterisk server?

2011-05-06 Thread Vahan Yerkanian
Has anyone used this board as an Asterisk server? http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPE.cfm?typ=H&IPMI=Y I'm mostly interested about the possible compatibility issues this board may have with the AEX800 card. -- ___

Re: [asterisk-users] question on ways to activate voicemail light on polycom

2011-05-06 Thread Mark Deneen
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > Is there a way in asterisk to Activate/Clear the blinking light on polycom > phones > indicating VM. Either from an AGI or some way in the dialplan? > > I want to be able to control this light for from my application. > I have an AGI to do somet

Re: [asterisk-users] Cannot install dahdi-linux on (old) PAE kernel.

2011-05-06 Thread Bob Beers
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Bob Beers wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Bob Beers wrote: >> Hi Steven, >> >> Can you put the .spec file from dahdi-linux-kmod package up? > >  Nevermind, I got it. :-) > > Looking at it now. Not sure if this will work, but I'd try adding, before line 86

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.2.18, Cisco 79XX not registering

2011-05-06 Thread Julian Lyndon-Smith
It was my problem ;) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18951 fixed in svn On 6 May 2011 16:45, Steve Davies wrote: > On 6 May 2011 16:30, Eric Wieling wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com >>> [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.c

[asterisk-users] question on ways to activate voicemail light on polycom

2011-05-06 Thread Jerry Geis
Is there a way in asterisk to Activate/Clear the blinking light on polycom phones indicating VM. Either from an AGI or some way in the dialplan? I want to be able to control this light for from my application. I have an AGI to do something similiar to VM and want to light /clear the light mysel

Re: [asterisk-users] Cannot install dahdi-linux on (old) PAE kernel.

2011-05-06 Thread Bob Beers
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Bob Beers wrote: > Hi Steven, > > Can you put the .spec file from dahdi-linux-kmod package up? Nevermind, I got it. :-) Looking at it now. Did you CC [Packager: Jason Parker ]? - Bob -- _ -- Ba

[asterisk-users] polycom page custom ring

2011-05-06 Thread satish patel
Currently we have following working page now i want to add custom ring type so people pay attention. Anybody know about what would be the variable to change custom ringer [all-page] exten => s,1,Set(TIMEOUT(absolute)=15) exten => s,n,AGI(page.agi) exten => s,n,SIPAddHeader(Alert-Info: Ring A

Re: [asterisk-users] Configuring Voicemail in Asterisk 1.8

2011-05-06 Thread Eric Wieling
You are using an old format for specifying the mailbox. See "core show application voicemail" for the correct usage. Also read ALL the UPGRADE*.txt files. > -Original Message- > From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf

Re: [asterisk-users] Background music during a call

2011-05-06 Thread Ioan Indreias
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Rizwan Hisham wrote: > I am in desperate need of this feature. I want to play background music > during a call while the 2 parties are having some lovely conversation (or > maybe give them a sort of cursing background if they are cursing each > other). Let's start

Re: [asterisk-users] Cannot install dahdi-linux on (old) PAE kernel.

2011-05-06 Thread Bob Beers
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:58 AM, wrote: > I am trying to install dahdi-linux from packages onto an OEL5u3 server which > has an old kernel (5.2.6.18_128) and is a PAE variant. As there are no kmod > packages now available for this kernel I am having to build them from source > packages. > > [snip

[asterisk-users] Gateway GSM x Comercio Indevido ?

2011-05-06 Thread Cláudio Duarte
Boa tarde a todos, Colegas estou a procura de um gateway GSM para ligar ao servidor asterisk de nossa empresa, o objetivo é interligar clientes e parceiros comerciais a nossa central, reduzindo custo das ligações para celular, porem ao ver o regulamento dos planos oferecidos pelas operadoras vi qu

Re: [asterisk-users] Configuring Voicemail in Asterisk 1.8

2011-05-06 Thread satish patel
change "u500" in extension.conf because asterisk 1.8 user "500,u" like following exten => open-NOANSWER,1,VoiceMail(5800,u) > Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 09:49:17 -0700 > From: bilmar...@yahoo.com > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [asterisk-users] Configuring Voicemail in Asterisk 1

[asterisk-users] Configuring Voicemail in Asterisk 1.8

2011-05-06 Thread bilal ghayyad
Hi All; Already in the voicemail.conf file, I added the extension 500 and kindly find below my voicemail configuration: [Internal] 0 => 1234,Gama Operator,opera...@gama.com 500 => 1234,Operator,opera...@gama.com 501 => 1234,Employer Name,employer_em...@gama.com 502 => 1234,Employer Name,employ

Re: [asterisk-users] ael context ~~s~~ in macros broke Dial() U() option in 1.6.2.17.2 and newer

2011-05-06 Thread Watkins, Bradley
> The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immed

[asterisk-users] QueueCallerAbandon is not triggering after 1.8.3.3...

2011-05-06 Thread Louis Carreiro
Has anyone else noticed that QueueCallerAbandon is not showing up in the AMI after the 1.8.3.3? Am I missing something? I'm getting what seems like everything else but QueueCallerAbandon. v/r, Me -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation P

Re: [asterisk-users] ael context ~~s~~ in macros broke Dial() U() option in 1.6.2.17.2 and newer

2011-05-06 Thread Mark G Thomas
Hi, On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 05:30:04PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On 11-05-05 05:14 PM, Mark G Thomas wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I think this must be a bug introduced with 1.6.2.17.something. > > > >When I upgrade from asterisk-1.6.2.16.1 to asterisk-1.6.2.17.2 or 1.6.2.18, > >my AEL Dial() commands

[asterisk-users] Cannot install dahdi-linux on (old) PAE kernel.

2011-05-06 Thread stephen.hindmarch
I am trying to install dahdi-linux from packages onto an OEL5u3 server which has an old kernel (5.2.6.18_128) and is a PAE variant. As there are no kmod packages now available for this kernel I am having to build them from source packages. I have installed the dahdi-firmware-2.0.0-1_centos5 RPM

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.2.18, Cisco 79XX not registering

2011-05-06 Thread Steve Davies
On 6 May 2011 16:30, Eric Wieling wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com >> [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of >> Cassius Smith >> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 11:23 AM >> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discu

[asterisk-users] Cannot built kmod-dahdi-linux for PAE kvariant from SRPM

2011-05-06 Thread stephen.hindmarch
After many moons I have revisited this problem and found a solution that moves the problem further up the stack. I will post my new problem separately but just for completeness here is the solution. Original problem: trying to build kmod-dahdi-linux for out of date PAE kernel. Errors: rpmbuild

[asterisk-users] Background music during a call

2011-05-06 Thread Rizwan Hisham
Hi All, I am in desperate need of this feature. I want to play background music during a call while the 2 parties are having some lovely conversation (or maybe give them a sort of cursing background if they are cursing each other). I found this post which talks about creating a ghost call with the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.2.18, Cisco 79XX not registering

2011-05-06 Thread Eric Wieling
I seem to recall this issue mentioned on asterisk-dev. Check issues.digium.com and see if there is anything similar to your issue. > -Original Message- > From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > Cassius Smith > Sent:

[asterisk-users] Missed call when call is answered by other phone

2011-05-06 Thread hbk
Hi, I use follow me and have several SIP phones answering, works nice but: All phones that did not answer a call have the number in missed call list even if answered by other ext. CDR gets messy too. Difficult to see if call is answered. I was thinking of possible solution: Turn of missed call o

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.2.18, Cisco 79XX not registering

2011-05-06 Thread Cassius Smith
Hi all, I have a production server running with about 90 Cisco 79[46]1's and SIP release 8.5(2)SR1 from last year. I was running Asterisk 1.6.2.9 and upgraded last night after hours. (Seemed low risk to me!) Much to my surprise, not a single one of the Cisco 79XX phones would register. Since it's

Re: [asterisk-users] TCP Trigger on incoming call request

2011-05-06 Thread isrlgb
Look at function CURL -Original Message- From: Daniel Isenmann Sender: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 13:04:09 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] TCP Trig

Re: [asterisk-users] TCP Trigger on incoming call request

2011-05-06 Thread Henk
Daniel, Have you thought about using CURL from the Dialplan? Henk Daniel Isenmann schreef: Hi, is it possible to configure a TCP trigger to a predefined address and port on a incoming call request? Some background: For example “Client 1” tries to call “Client 2”, “Client 1” is sending

[asterisk-users] TCP Trigger on incoming call request

2011-05-06 Thread Daniel Isenmann
Hi, is it possible to configure a TCP trigger to a predefined address and port on a incoming call request? Some background: For example "Client 1" tries to call "Client 2", "Client 1" is sending the call request to Asterisk (SIP-Server). Asterisk open a connection to the predefined address an

Re: [asterisk-users] Discussion: Are we ready to leave 1.4 behind?

2011-05-06 Thread Watkins, Bradley
> >Thanks for the feedback, Ira. It makes me very sad to hear what you say and I >hope that we can get more resources from the community to assist in the >process to make it more friendly. We want to get those bug reports. The one >thing I hate to hear when I'm travelling at conferences is that "oh

Re: [asterisk-users] Discussion: Are we ready to leave 1.4 behind?

2011-05-06 Thread Olle E. Johansson
5 maj 2011 kl. 18.30 skrev Ira: > At 07:56 AM 5/5/2011, you wrote: >> So how can we fix this? How can we get more people involded? What makes >> projects like FedoraTesting[3] and DebianTesting[4] popular? How can the >> Asterisk project reproduce their success? > > Well, it's not a lot of

Re: [asterisk-users] is res_timing_timerfd module stable in 1.8?

2011-05-06 Thread Nic Colledge
New Text at Bottom: --- hi: my current system is 1.6.2. I have dahdi hardware card. I must disable res_timing_timerfd module or sometimes phone calls would become silent suddenly. I don't know the situation in 1.8. I heard that timing is still a problem in 1.8. should I kee

[asterisk-users] is res_timing_timerfd module stable in 1.8?

2011-05-06 Thread d tbsky
hi: my current system is 1.6.2. I have dahdi hardware card. I must disable res_timing_timerfd module or sometimes phone calls would become silent suddenly. I don't know the situation in 1.8. I heard that timing is still a problem in 1.8. should I keep using "res_timing_dahdi" or I can use "res

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8 latest branch safe for production ?

2011-05-06 Thread Ishfaq Malik
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 14:13 +, satish patel wrote: > Hi All, > > Just wondering is it safe to use asterisk 1.8 latest branch on > production ? > > http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/1.8/ Revision > 317100 > > -S We've been running 1.8.3.2 with the patch to fix the local chan

Re: [asterisk-users] Discussion: Are we ready to leave 1.4 behind?

2011-05-06 Thread Ira
At 01:07 PM 5/5/2011, you wrote: Fair enough, what are some examples of questions you have? It only takes a moment to create a new wiki page and start documenting them. If you willing to provide the questions and feedback, I'm more then happy to write them on the wiki. So to start, I'm a us

Re: [asterisk-users] Discussion: Are we ready to leave 1.4 behind?

2011-05-06 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
I am still using Asterisk 1.4 because of the Asterisk GUI. I don't understand why it was ever dropped, it's easy to setup (no SQL databases), quick, works well and in my experiance it gets along with manual config file changes. The only real issue I've encountered with 1.4 is Digium can't seem to