Re: [asterisk-users] Possible bug - queue doesn't play hold music

2012-12-20 Thread Ishfaq Malik
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 11:16 -0600, Richard Mudgett wrote: On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 15:16 +, Ishfaq Malik wrote: Hi Can someone else please check the following: We have installed asterisk 1.8.18.0 onto our development and test servers. They were previously on 1.8.7.0 When

Re: [asterisk-users] Possible bug - queue doesn't play hold music

2012-12-20 Thread Ishfaq Malik
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 09:23 +, Ishfaq Malik wrote: On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 11:16 -0600, Richard Mudgett wrote: On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 15:16 +, Ishfaq Malik wrote: Hi Can someone else please check the following: We have installed asterisk 1.8.18.0 onto our development and

Re: [asterisk-users] Congestion() forcing PRI channels to be not available

2012-12-20 Thread Steve Davies
On 19 December 2012 21:54, Christopher Harrington ch...@acsdi.com wrote: You probably already know this, but 1.4x is very old (released in 2006) and is officially end-of-life. https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Versions You might get more help or better behavior by updating

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk conferencing |MEETME or app_conference

2012-12-20 Thread Bharat Lalcheta
Hii, we implemented the same senario with modification of meet-me application and using php and mysql. When user want to talk, he press some predefined digit on the phone. Admin can view who raise hands (press digit) in php page and press predeifned digit and that user get unmuted. As soon as

[asterisk-users] Recommended T.38 settings for receiving faxes from Cisco AS5350XM

2012-12-20 Thread Andreas Sikkema
Hi, What are the recommended T.38 settings for sending/receiving faxes from Cisco AS5350XM gateways? The chan_sip.conf file has a remark about what Cisco is doing wrong and says that the values received from the gateway should be overridden, but doesn't say what settings to use for maximum

[asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and no RTP

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
I have a CentOS 6.3 machine I installed Asterisk 11, worked fine... I then tried to install on Cents 5.8, seemed to go fine... Then when I placed a call I got this: ast_rtp_instance_new: No RTP engine was found. Do you have one loaded? Did a search and found issues with ARM and this problem

Re: [asterisk-users] Congestion() forcing PRI channels to be not available

2012-12-20 Thread James Lamanna
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Steve Davies davies...@gmail.com wrote: On 19 December 2012 21:54, Christopher Harrington ch...@acsdi.com wrote: You probably already know this, but 1.4x is very old (released in 2006) and is officially end-of-life.

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and no RTP

2012-12-20 Thread Jonathan Rose
Jerry Geis wrote: I have a CentOS 6.3 machine I installed Asterisk 11, worked fine... I then tried to install on Cents 5.8, seemed to go fine... Then when I placed a call I got this: ast_rtp_instance_new: No RTP engine was found. Do you have one loaded? Did a search and found issues

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
This was a change in v1.8 and is documented in the v1.8 UPGRADE.txt file: * The PRI channels in chan_dahdi can no longer change the channel name if a different B channel is selected during call negotiation. To prevent using the channel name to infer what B channel a call is using and to

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8.19.0 - [2012-12-18 19:19:51] ERROR[24485]: astobj2.c:115 INTERNAL_OBJ: user_data is NULL

2012-12-20 Thread Matthew Jordan
On 12/18/2012 10:56 AM, Tim Nelson wrote: I'm getting this error message on my Asterisk CLI, and in the logs, roughly every 10-20 seconds: [2012-12-18 19:19:51] ERROR[24485]: astobj2.c:115 INTERNAL_OBJ: user_data is NULL While it doesn't appear to be actually affecting anything, I'm

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Richard Mudgett
This was a change in v1.8 and is documented in the v1.8 UPGRADE.txt file: * The PRI channels in chan_dahdi can no longer change the channel name if a different B channel is selected during call negotiation. To prevent using the channel name to infer what B channel a call is using

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
It is Action: ExtensionState Exten: 5551212 Context: fubar This will return the status of the dialplan exten hint. / and // Action: Command // Command: ChanIsAvail // Parameters: DAHDI/1 // // says Error // No such command ChanIsAvail / ChanIsAvail is a dialplan application not a CLI

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Danny Nicholas
The Asterisk 11 part is irrelevant. You need to use an AGI or local call to use the ChanIsAvail function. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:03 AM To: Asterisk Users

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Richard Mudgett
It is Action: ExtensionState Exten: 5551212 Context: fubar This will return the status of the dialplan exten hint. and Action: Command Command: ChanIsAvail Parameters: DAHDI/1 says Error No such command ChanIsAvail ChanIsAvail is a dialplan application not a CLI command. It

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
You should just cache the AMI DAHDIChannel event information in your program. If you really must you could use the CLI command pri show channels. However, it is not intended to be repeatedly run for performance reasons. It blocks processing of ISDN messages while it is running. I am not

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Danny Nicholas
IMO the local channel call should be the lowest overhead option available. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:42 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Richard Mudgett
You should just cache the AMI DAHDIChannel event information in your program. If you really must you could use the CLI command pri show channels. However, it is not intended to be repeatedly run for performance reasons. It blocks processing of ISDN messages while it is running. I am not

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
IMO the local channel call should be the lowest overhead option available. What about: Action: Command Command: dahdi show channels I can just look to see if Extension has anything for the Chan I am interested in? is

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
On 12/20/2012 01:00 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: IMO the local channel call should be the lowest overhead option available. What about: Action: Command Command: dahdi show channels I can just look to see if Extension has

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
I have a little dialplan context now... [check-chanisavail] exten = s,1,ChanIsAvail(${agi_channel}) exten = s,n,System(/bin/echo ${AVAILCHAN} /tmp/${agi_file}) exten = s,n,Hangup() and a call file: Channel: Local/s@check-chanisavail/n Context: check-chanisavail Extension: s Priority: 1

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Danny Nicholas
Just for grins, do you have a softphone like xlite that you can try the outgoing call on? I think it's an outgoing issue, not a polycom one. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis Sent:

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
Just for grins, do you have a softphone like xlite that you can try the outgoing call on? I think it's an outgoing issue, not a polycom one. I do not have a softphone. I have a yealink VP-2009 and same behavior. Jerry -- _

Re: [asterisk-users] sip call failed in openbts with asterisk

2012-12-20 Thread Eric Wieling
Cause 20 means your SIP device is not registered or you do not have an IP specified for it in your peer. sip show peers will show that. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Scott Huang Sent:

[asterisk-users] libpri 1.4.14 Now Available

2012-12-20 Thread Asterisk Development Team
The Asterisk Development Team has announced the release of libpri 1.4.14. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/libpri The release of libpri 1.4.14 resolves several issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and no RTP

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis
Error loading module 'res_rtp_asterisk.so': /usr/lib64/libavformat.so.52: undefined symbol: av_tree_node_size This is the error I get when trying to start Asterisk 11 on centos 5. Asterisk 11 works fine on my centos 6 box - I also verified that on centos 6 I do not have the above mentioend

[asterisk-users] bug? 'dahdi show channel x' HWEC echo cancellation display is incorrect while not on a call

2012-12-20 Thread Justin Killen
When doing a 'dahdi show channel X' from the asterisk console, when the line is not part of a call the echo cancellation line ALWAYS says 'currently OFF'. Once a call is in progress, it will change to 'ON'. Is this a bug, or is the behavior by design? My setup: Asterisk 10.10.0 Dahdi 2.6.1

Re: [asterisk-users] bug? 'dahdi show channel x' HWEC echo cancellation display is incorrect while not on a call

2012-12-20 Thread Russ Meyerriecks
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 03:13:01PM -0800, Justin Killen wrote: When doing a 'dahdi show channel X' from the asterisk console, when the line is not part of a call the echo cancellation line ALWAYS says 'currently OFF'. Once a call is in progress, it will change to 'ON'. Is this a bug, or is the

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and no RTP

2012-12-20 Thread Jonathan Rose
Jerry Geis wrote: Error loading module 'res_rtp_asterisk.so': /usr/lib64/libavformat.so.52: undefined symbol: av_tree_node_size This is the error I get when trying to start Asterisk 11 on centos 5. Asterisk 11 works fine on my centos 6 box - I also verified that on centos 6 I do

Re: [asterisk-users] bug? 'dahdi show channel x' HWEC echo cancellation display is incorrect while not on a call

2012-12-20 Thread Justin Killen
This is highly confusing. It would be nice if at least the display gave the configured value as well. -Justin Killen -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Russ Meyerriecks Sent: Thursday, December

[asterisk-users] dahdi timing source multiple cards

2012-12-20 Thread Dave George
I have a box with 12 T1s (4 Te410P cards). The PSTN provider is reporting slips and ask me to update the clock source. I have my system.conf set as the following but when I run dahdi_scan only the ports on Card 1 are showing up with syncsrc=1 system.conf : span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=2-24