http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/01/09/telecoms.powell.reut/index.h
tml
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Drawing turf lines over useless information doesn't foster a helpful,
collaborative environment no matter who is giving out the useless advice.
FYI: Brian actually has spoken with both myself and Derek about our Asterisk
implementation, and therefore knows us well enough to tell us to fire our
Does anyone else think there should be a FAQ made specifically for the
mailing list, and posted here automatically maybe every 2-4 weeks?
I was -JUST- thinking that this morning. I've seen this done on other
lists, and while it may be a waste of bandwidth... it will most certainly
help
I've seen a lot of traffic on the list recently about which phones can do
supervised transfers and which cannot, and I have to admit that I'm a bit
puzzled. Our existing PBX, which is software based, handles the transfer
functions for our call center -- the agents never touch their phone, and
http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=documentation
Try that, too.
- Devon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dayo Adeyeye
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 5:26 PM
To: Asterisk
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterix Newbie
Hello,
Just installed
I guess my big question is: is it possible to have extensions mapped to
people, not to phones?
Yes, you just need to link the user/extension to a technology/channel
when logged in, and to a bogus value when not so that your dial will
fail quickly and fall through to voicemail. Also you
should go to and its done.
bkw
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Devon Henderson wrote:
Being a relative Asterisk newbie, I may be wrong.. but as far as I can
tell,
it doesn't. The standard queue/agent logic requires that you assign an
extension to a phone.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, please
We're still in the planning stages of our Asterisk implementation, but we
have a requirement that the extension be mapped to a user, with the phone as
a variable (we have hot seats in our contact center, and we also have agents
that work both from remote locations and our contact center).
So, I
-Original Message-
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 15:45, Devon Henderson wrote:
Exactly, Steven. However, we also want the following logic to work:
Agent 1 (ext. 1234) can login (either via the telephone, or
preferably, a
web interface) from either of the below locations and have
calls
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Extension and phone management best
practices??
AgentLoginCallback does this doesn't it?
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 11:28, Devon
10 matches
Mail list logo