I am running Trixbox 2.4 which has Asterisk 1.4.18-1
I have kind of followed:
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20T.38
I added to sip_general_custom.conf
;NEEDED!!!
t38pt_udptl = yes
I did not add this to the actual SIP extension, as I assumed this being
general it
Particularly WRT T.38 fax.
Supposedly, when fax tones are detected, Asterisk is to do a reinvite
asking for T.38.
Here is what I am using in my dialplan:
[custom-fax1]
exten = s,1,Answer
exten = s,n,StopPlayTones
exten = s,n,Set(FAXFILE=/var/spool/asterisk/fax/${UNIQUEID}.tif)
exten =
Is there something equivalent to SipT38SwitchOver in Asterisk (in
callweaver)...
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
I was pointed to the following:
http://asteriskforum.ru/viewtopic.php?t=1761
It is in Russian, which I don't speak, but it references an Asterisk patch.
Is this patch in 1.4.17?
Is it scheduled to be in 1.4.18 (or whatever ships after 1.4.17?)
Anyone work with this?
What are the values for type for chan_mobile?
headset and phone ???
I get my Treo650 to pair.
hcitool scan shows the device.
hcitool con comes up empty.
I go into Asterisk cli.
mobile search shows the device (while I am waiting for a response, I see
the phone showing a connection being set
,
but this did not make a difference.
Johansson Olle E wrote:
10 jan 2008 kl. 15.24 skrev Robert Moskowitz:
I am seeing slight differences in URIs.
In the case where things work, the URI is [EMAIL PROTECTED] where it
does not work is [EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
In the first case I suspect
Olivier wrote:
Mitel and Avaya support 802.1X with proprietary protocols.
For Siemens, I'm not so sure.
Two facts:
Proprietary EAP methods that can actually complete in a reasonable
amount of time. Many of these have small security holes and thus are
not acceptable as standards. (I know, I
Olivier wrote:
I thought that :
1. 802.1X was mainly when you plug your hardphone into your network,
802.1X-2001 was written to secure ports on a 802.3 switch. Originally
for PCs works just fine for phones. Really does NOT play with VLANs,
but HP cheated (I know their lead engineers).
I have been trying to do this. The only thing, really holding me up is
IAXmodem 1.0 rpm for Centos5. Anyone want to build it for me (I am
terrible at compiling; do it maybe once a year).
Armin Krämer wrote:
Hi,
this problem could be a bit tricky. We´ve got some good old
Fax-Machines
I am seeing slight differences in URIs.
In the case where things work, the URI is [EMAIL PROTECTED] where it
does not work is [EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
In the first case I suspect that Asterisk did something, perhaps at
startup, where it 'decided' it was behind a firewall, so let the
firewall
Olivier wrote:
When we were starting on 802.1AE (LinkSec), Norm Finn (a CISCO Fellow
and long time worker on 802.1 and other layer 2 standards) said it
well:
Layer 2 security protects and addresses the liablities of the
network owner
Layer 3 security protects and
Olivier wrote:
2008/1/10, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jeronimo Romero wrote:
Does anyone know if sip phones from any of the major IP phone
vendors
support 802.1x authentication? Any feedback would be greatly
appreciated
Olivier wrote:
2008/1/10, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Olivier wrote:
2008/1/10, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jeronimo Romero
/showfiles.php?group_id=148814
Jonn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Moskowitz
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 7:29 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Using Asterisk
Olivier wrote:
So, I think in this case (Ethernet link), standard spandsp doesn't
help as it needs a TDM board.
Nope not the case at all. I have been doing
fax--ATA--lan--Asterisk-email for quite some time without ANY zaptel
interfaces. Zaptel creats the pseudo interface and that does the
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
I just built one. Give it a try.
I will grab it and put it into my local repo after I get back from an
errand. thanks!
Jonn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Moskowitz
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008
Nailed it!
TCPdump on Trixbox 2.4 (Asterisk 1.4.17-1) going out and public side of
firewall (Linksys WRT54G running Sveasoft) Firewall is configued NOT to
NAT (public addressing on internal network.
I stop asterisk (amportal stop). wait 30 min to insure timeout. Start
both tcpdumps. Start
Jeronimo Romero wrote:
Does anyone know if sip phones from any of the major IP phone vendors
support 802.1x authentication? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
This is so unlikely. I worked on 802.1X and 802.11i. There is just too
much overhead there. No way to meet the ITU 50ms
I have a server behind a firewall. It is publicly addressed. Should
NOT be trying to NAT (how would I know).
The connection is a SIP trunk to Broadvoice. I am calling the
Broadvoice # from my cell and the call is being routed to my server.
With one firewall the INVITE contains information
I have a SIP trunk to Broadvoice. My Asterisk box (1.4.13) is on public
addresses behind a firewall.
Originally it was behind a Linksys WRT54G running sveasoft. Sveasoft
really can't NOT do NAT even when you turn it off. My Asterisk box is
defined as the DMZ box to Sveasoft and it seemed
I have been looking forward for months to get chan_mobile working. I am
limited to using prepackaged Asterisk code, mostly Trixbox.
I have recently heard that chan_mobile is considered 'beta' and there is
no effort to move it into the main code of Asterisk. Not even for
Asterisk 1.6.
So
Moises Silva wrote:
You should not care for debug messages unless you are debugging.
I have been debugging. My IAXmodem connection.
core show codecs
Will show you format 8 is ALAW
thanks.
- Moy
On Nov 28, 2007 2:41 PM, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The IAX2 channel
The IAX2 channel is to IAXmodem.
The SIP extension is an ATA with a fax attached.
Nov 28 15:30:20 DEBUG[2997] chan_sip.c: build_route: Contact hop:
Nov 28 15:30:20 VERBOSE[3276] logger.c: -- SIP/2201-090995f0 answered
IAX2/24729-2
Nov 28 15:30:20 DEBUG[2995] chan_iax2.c: Ooh, voice format
A few weeks ago, I lost my Trixbox that was all set up with Hylafax and
IAXmodem.
I am trying to set it up for
email procmail faxmail iaxmodem asterisk sipext ATA (with
attached fax).
I have followed all the instructions on creating the IAX extension and
configuring the IAXmodem config
oops.
I meant to post this to the Hylafax list :-[
And with a reboot, at least it made the call. Now to get the fax to print!
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
A few weeks ago, I lost my Trixbox that was all set up with Hylafax and
IAXmodem.
I am trying to set it up for
email procmail faxmail
I would like to share some facts about wifi and wifi security vis-a-vis
wifi phones.
First off, it takes REAL time to negotiate the 4-way-handshake. Not
even thinking about the 802.1X authentication. Thus a person walking at
a normal rate, going through a door will find themselves
Olivier wrote:
Robert,
Do you mean T.38 passthrough ou T.38 to T.30 gateway ?
The former is said to work with Asterisk 1.4 but the latter is not ...
I know about what Asterisk 1.4 can do. And Asterisk 1.2 only does T.30
passthrough :) You need 'stuff' to handle fax. Stuff like spandsp,
extension, and it kicks off rxfax (I can provide mine
here) should work just fine with T.38 as they do with T.30 over RTP.
However digium refuses to include such a program with Asterisk.
On Nov 21, 2007 6:13 PM, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that Spandsp has everything
It seems that Spandsp has everything in it (when you include rxfax and
txfax) to be a T.38 termination when used with Asterisk 1.4?
And if so, what version of Spandsp?
What version of IAXModem (so I don't have to also deal with T38Modem)?
___
I have been shaking down a dialplan for SIP fax to efax.
The basic senario is an ATA on the same subnet as the Asterisk 1.2 box
(avoid RTP packet lose and thus fax crash), calling a 'fax extension'
and envoking rxfax then email.
I leverage off of context: from-internal-additional-custom, so as
I see that the term now is chan_mobile to use a bluetooth to cellphone
trunk. (what is in a name? :) )
What I want to know is:
Is there any restriction on the bluetooth chipset for the server?
Can I use the dongle for PAN and chan_mobile at the same time?
Can I use the dongle for headset (a
Joe acquisto wrote:
APC makes a two line unit. PTEL2. But it's two lines in one jack.
I have always been a fan of Triplite. They use old tech when
appropriate. I am big on Line Conditioners and UPSs with line
conditioning. Of course power in my house is really bad. Anything big
kicks on
I am putting some scripts together to allow a local admin to add
extensions, then to reload the extensions, something like:
asterisk -r -x extensions reload
Are registered extensions forced to reauth?
Are active calls disrupted?
___
--Bandwidth
Is DTLS available for Asterisk on any Linux distro?
I am most interested in Centos
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Noah Miller wrote:
Is DTLS available for Asterisk on any Linux distro?
Nope.
I've read that the reSIProcate SIP stack has DTLS support.
I found out that DTLS is in openSSL 0.9.8. This is available with
Redhat/Centos 5.
So the code is there. Perhaps just configuring it to some ports
Giedrius Augys wrote:
Hi,
My situation is : I need to send fax from sip device attached fax
over zap channel. Using G711, fax send ok, but is it posible to use
t.38 protocol. Maybe someone can suggest me what software to use?
You want to go to the spandsp site and read all the challenges.
I have been having no success with my zap interface, and am trying to
use ztmonitor to fix it.
I am running Trixbox 1.1 and so far have one x100p card (shows up as
'Wildcard).
I tried many manual attempts at setting rx and tx gain with no results.
Then I read:
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:57:02AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have been having no success with my zap interface, and am trying to
use ztmonitor to fix it.
I am running Trixbox 1.1 and so far have one x100p card (shows up as
'Wildcard).
I tried many manual
38 matches
Mail list logo