Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

Kevin Walsh wrote: Eric Wieling aka ManxPower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: r: Generate a ringing tone for the calling party, passing no audio from the called channel(s) until one answers. Use with care and don't insert this by default into all your dial statements as you are killing call progress

RE: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 18:06 +0100, Kevin Walsh wrote: > Eric Wieling aka ManxPower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Justin Selleck wrote: > > > Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot > > > find it anywhere. > > > > > r: Generate a ringing tone for the calling party, pa

RE: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

Eric Wieling aka ManxPower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Justin Selleck wrote: > > Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot > > find it anywhere. > > > r: Generate a ringing tone for the calling party, passing no audio from > the called channel(s) until one answers. Use

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

That announcement was an Aprol Fools Joke. There is no Asterisk 2.0 Justin Selleck wrote: Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot find it anywhere. -- Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-210-3699 x2120 r: Generate a ringing tone for the calling party, pass

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

Justin Selleck wrote: Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot find it anywhere. No. It's not out. 1.2 isn't even out. And thank god its NOT programmed in C#. -Matthew ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-User

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

> Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot > find it anywhere. You must be referring to this post : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-April/098601.html Please note the date of the posting, and this particular phrase in it : "Asterisk 2.0 was m

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

That was an April Fools Day joke...unfortunately whoever started it didn't think about what it would do to the Archive. Justin Selleck wrote: Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot find it anywhere. **---

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

LOL. Look even more, and you'll find it funny. On 8/10/05, Justin Selleck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot > find it anywhere. > > --- > Justin Selleck > Ne

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

Justin Selleck wrote: Is asterisk 2.0 real? Running in c#? I see references to it but cannot find it anywhere. **---*** ***Justin Selleck*** ***Network Engineer*** ***Smooth Fusion, Inc.*** http://www.smoothfusion.com

[Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

Is asterisk 2.0 real?  Running in c#?  I see references to it but cannot find it anywhere.   --- Justin Selleck Network Engineer Smooth Fusion, Inc. http://www.smoothfusion.com t. 806.771.3873 x230 f. 806.771.2862  

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

John Novack wrote: An even BETTER question is: When will what is already out and more or less working have enough accurate documentation to make it acceptable to a wider audience? Once more people start contributing. As one small example: the recent postings regarding wctdm. If all the options a

RE: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

, 3 April 2005 5:15 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now James Gardiner wrote: > Asterisk 2.0 on Windows.. This is all very much a bit of a Joke, but one > does beg to ask. > > When will ve

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

Brian Capouch wrote: James Gardiner wrote: Asterisk 2.0 on Windows.. This is all very much a bit of a Joke, but one does beg to ask. When will version 2.0 be released??? 2.0 is just now really being talked about in earnest. I think a better question would be when 1.2 is going to be out. An even

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

James Gardiner wrote: Asterisk 2.0 on Windows.. This is all very much a bit of a Joke, but one does beg to ask. When will version 2.0 be released??? 2.0 is just now really being talked about in earnest. I think a better question would be when 1.2 is going to be out. That one has more narrow bounds

RE: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

Asterisk 2.0 on Windows.. This is all very much a bit of a Joke, but one does beg to ask. When will version 2.0 be released??? James ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

scussion | CC: | Onderwerp: Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now | | | | On Friday 01 April 2005 02:40, Olle E. Johansson wrote: | > During the developer's conference call yesterday evening, | > it was decided that we finally s

RE: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 14:50:45 -0700, Wiley Siler wrote > Un what is todays date? > You will have to excuse the people who live outside the USA that do not know that April 1st is April Fools day as it is not an international thing. -- Carlos Chavez Director de Tecnología Telecomunicaciones Ab

RE: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

Un what is todays date? W -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Angel Diaz Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 1:31 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now This version support SS7

[Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

This version support SS7 - ISUP protocol ? Does some body know where can I find it ? I mean, Asterisk SS7... Angel. Message: 21 Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 09:40:33 +0200 From: "Olle E. Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now To

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

--On Friday, April 01, 2005 3:47 AM -0600 Matthew Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Asterisk 2.0 was moved to a Microsoft platform due to the demand for higher stability and a more secure foundation. It wasn't until I read this line that I knew it was a joke. I mean, seriously, who assoc

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

The second I read ".NET, C#, and Microsoft" in the same paragraph as the word "Stability" I knew it was an April Fools.  And that is because only a fool would associate the word "stable" with anything Microshaft related. At 03:01 AM 4/1/2005, you wrote: Olle E. Johansson wrote: During the devel

RE: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:17:45AM -0600, Mike Hammett said: > Ya, I mean do you really think an open source community is gonna > acknowledge that MS can do anything right? of course not. THEY'RE THE > DEVIL! > (note, I will not re

RE: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now That in now way shape or form was funny. I about had a heart attack when I was reading this. To move to a winDOZ platform would just make asterisk SUCK! But its nice to know its staying where it is. .o

RES: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Mike Hammett > Enviada em: sexta-feira, 1 de abril de 2005 14:18 > Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Assunto: Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now > >

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:17:45AM -0600, Mike Hammett said: > Ya, I mean do you really think an open source community is gonna > acknowledge that MS can do anything right? of course not. THEY'RE THE > DEVIL! > (note, I will not respond to anything posted in reply to this, so don't > even try)

RE: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

Engineer Planet Telecom, Inc. Tampa, FL Office -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Friday, 01 April, 2005 12:18 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

Remco Barende wrote: On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Chris Hills wrote: Olle E. Johansson wrote: * New source code structure - C# and .net Asterisk 2.0 was moved to a Microsoft platform due to the demand for higher stability and a more secure foundation. Therefore,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 09:39 -0500, steve szmidt wrote: > For the rest of you, good luck! You'll need it. I think finally the Danish > Elephant beer that is so strong has gone to Olle's head. Oh yes Elephant beer, 30 years ago I drove from Stockholm to Nortalia(sp?) after 3 or 4 bottles of that,

RE: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

[Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now On Friday 01 April 2005 02:40, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > During the developer's conference call yesterday evening, > it was decided that we finally should release the much-awaited

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

On Friday 01 April 2005 02:40, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > During the developer's conference call yesterday evening, > it was decided that we finally should release the much-awaited > Asterisk 2.0 Stable release, also called "codename AAFJ". Olle, you better take a break! For the rest of you, goo

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

Hello, Olle! OEJ>Asterisk 2.0 was moved to a Microsoft platform due to the OEJ>demand for higher stability and a more secure foundation. Nice... I remember that about 10 years ago, when I was working in a daily newspaper we wrote and article on April 1st on a first page about scientific b

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

>Asterisk 2.0 was moved to a Microsoft platform due to the >demand for higher stability and a more secure foundation. It wasn't until I read this line that I knew it was a joke. I mean, seriously, who associates Microsoft with stability and security? A fool, that's who. -Matthew ___

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Chris Hills wrote: Olle E. Johansson wrote: * New source code structure - C# and .net Asterisk 2.0 was moved to a Microsoft platform due to the demand for higher stability and a more secure foundation. Therefore, the code was quickly

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

Olle E. Johansson wrote: * New source code structure - C# and .net Asterisk 2.0 was moved to a Microsoft platform due to the demand for higher stability and a more secure foundation. Therefore, the code was quickly moved to C# on the .net platform.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 09:40 +0200, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > During the developer's conference call yesterday evening, > it was decided that we finally should release the much-awaited > Asterisk 2.0 Stable release, also called "codename AAFJ". > > This relaese is based on the "hidden" cvs that ha

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

Good one guys, for a minute you actually had me there. The give away is: >Rumours has it that one developer actually ported the >Erlang runtime and executed an Ericsson AXE switch within >Asterisk. :-) Nir S On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 09:40 +0200, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > During the dev

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

Olle E. Johansson wrote: During the developer's conference call yesterday evening, it was decided that we finally should release the much-awaited Asterisk 2.0 Stable release, also called "codename AAFJ". AAFJ as in "Asterisk April Fool's Joke"? Nice :) __

[Asterisk-Users] *** Asterisk 2.0 Stable release out now

During the developer's conference call yesterday evening, it was decided that we finally should release the much-awaited Asterisk 2.0 Stable release, also called "codename AAFJ". This relaese is based on the "hidden" cvs that has been in operation for six months by a group of core development membe