Dmitriy Serov wrote:
At the moment I plan to migrate from asterisk 13.7 to 13.8.
Because of relatively frequent updates I am building asterisk from a
directory that is updated via git switch to the desired branch.
1. Will be updated pjproject patches with "git pull"?
Yes.
2. Will update
At the moment I plan to migrate from asterisk 13.7 to 13.8.
Because of relatively frequent updates I am building asterisk from a
directory that is updated via git switch to the desired branch.
1. Will be updated pjproject patches with "git pull"?
2. Will update himself pjproject?
3. And what
Good luck as with any new version there may be some bugs so if you bump up
against ones report them so they can be fixed.
Also don't just drop it into production with out testing it on a box for a
bit. 1.8 has a lot of changes. Most appear to be for the better.
The only important difference I
Hello,
I have a few questions regarding Asterisk 1.8.0. If you can answer a
question, please do so.
Is Asterisk 1.8.0 stable enough for production environments?
Is it possible (and if yes what is the best option) to use CDR MySQL with
Asterisk 1.8.0? With 1.6.x we use the add-on package for
From: Mark Scholten m...@streamservice.nl
Hello,
I have a few questions regarding Asterisk 1.8.0. If you can answer a
question, please do so.
Is Asterisk 1.8.0 stable enough for production environments?
It appars to be so far we are testing and
Background:
I have been tasked with moving from a Norstar Meridian system to an
Asterisk system. My budget is flexible as long as I can show that what
I am doing is worthwhile. My current setup is a T1 (non-PRI) and 4
copper POTS lines in going to about 22 phones and 1 fax (there is
another
Warren wrote:
Am I best off using Hylafax?
Yes.
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Hi Warren -
Questions:
(1) Good 2xT1 card with hard echo cancellation?
I'm not sure if it has onboard echo can, but Sangoma has a two port
model. I've never used them (I have a TE410P), but I've always read
very positive things about them, especially on the quality of the echo
can they use.
On 12/9/05, Kerry Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/9/05, Kerry Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overhead paging is totally possible, there are several articles
available on how to do it. But you cannot have multiple zones today
unless you use a sip device that has autoanswer.
we are beginning to test asterisk for our office
one of the features of the current phone system that is very heavily
used is overhead paging
now i came accross this post
http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?t=2844highlight=features
that basically says it is not possible with asterisk.
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stas Khromoy
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 8:21 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] a few questions
we are beginning to test asterisk for our office one of the features of the
current
@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] a few questions
we are beginning to test asterisk for our office one of the features of the
current phone system that is very heavily used is overhead paging
now i came accross this post
http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?t=2844highlight=features
On 12/9/05, Stas Khromoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we are beginning to test asterisk for our office
one of the features of the current phone system that is very heavily
used is overhead paging
Overhead paging can be done with asteirsk in anyway you want, you can
even do mutilple zones, all
-Users] a few questions
we are beginning to test asterisk for our office one of the features of the
current phone system that is very heavily used is overhead paging
now i came accross this post
http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?t=2844highlight=features
that basically says
hehe
I just installed * with a T1 span to and Adit600 with 2fxs and 1fxo
The 8 fxo ports were for zone pageing
works great
should work with any fxo device and an existing page system
On Dec 9, 2005, at 11:34 AM, C F wrote:
Overhead paging is totally possible, there are several articles
On 12/9/05, Kerry Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overhead paging is totally possible, there are several articles
available on how to do it. But you cannot have multiple zones today
unless you use a sip device that has autoanswer.
Why can mutilple zones not be done?,
- Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] a few questions
On 12/9/05, Kerry Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overhead paging is totally possible, there are several articles
available on how to do it. But you cannot have multiple zones today
unless you use a sip device that has
my apologies if anything
but as i said i am not that knowledgeable
and most probably misunderstood the post.
as it looks from your reply i have
if you don't mind letting me know what i got wrong
i would greatly appreciate it.
On 12/9/05, Stas Khromoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we are
Hey - best trick is not to take any of it personally.
We all fell off our bikes while learning to ride!
(old quote, but still valid)
PaulH
Stas Khromoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my apologies if anything
but as i said i am not that knowledgeable
and most probably misunderstood the post.
Adam,
Thanks for your help.
Does anyone know or is anyone an * guru in the New Hampshire/Vermont area?
how about this example.
User1 sits at his desk, a call comes in.(doesn’t matter how the call
gets to his phone, DID or exten) he needs to go into the warehouse to
look at something. He
Hi Kurth,
I'm in NJ. I'd be happy to help you out either on the phone or in person.
Gimme a call 973 828 1625
Mark
Kurth Bemis wrote:
Adam,
Thanks for your help.
Does anyone know or is anyone an * guru in the New Hampshire/Vermont area?
how about this example.
User1 sits at his desk, a
I am attempting to assemble a proposal for a client of mine that is
looking to replace their phone system. I think it's a good first
installation with 4 POTS incoming and 15 extensions, with an overhead
paging system. I also think that it would make a good case for OSS
applications in general.
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 01:31 -0400, Kurth Bemis wrote:
I am attempting to assemble a proposal for a client of mine that is
looking to replace their phone system. I think it's a good first
installation with 4 POTS incoming and 15 extensions, with an overhead
paging system. I also think that
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:06:48PM -0400, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
I have Asterisk running on a FreeBSD machine that is also my
router/firewall and MySQL server.
Asterisk is a CPU-intesive program. It will probably work fine with a
router/firewall, but with another potentially-CPU-intensive
I've got my own Asterisk tech. He's been with the company for about 2 years, finally convinced me to switch to Asterisk.Matt Riddell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:[SNIP] line, you will need an FXO card. We are a _Digium reseller_ so I can get [SNIP] other questions, I just
On 6/5/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should checkout [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thanks for the link - unfortunately [EMAIL PROTECTED] won't quite do the trick
for
me here as it is a complete OS replacement from what I can tell... I
can't do that. I have too much time and money
] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C. Hatton Humphrey
Sent: Monday, 6 June 2005 10:09 AM
Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] A Few Questions
On 6/5/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You should checkout
] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C. Hatton Humphrey
Sent: Monday, 6 June 2005 10:09 AM
Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] A Few Questions
On 6/5/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You should checkout [EMAIL
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] A Few Questions
On 6/5/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You should checkout [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thanks for the link - unfortunately [EMAIL PROTECTED] won't quite do the
trick for
me here
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:38:52PM -0400, Matt wrote:
Then download the tar ball! It will install on any redhat (and maybe
other) based systems as it compiles from source.
Great. Get the latest RedHat for FreeBSD from http://redhat.com/bsd/ .
Naturally the linux zaptel code will compile
I've been watching the mailing list for a few days, have done some
archive searching and still have a handfull of questions (I've looked
for most of these on voip-info.org and a slew of other asterisk
related sites). I'm going to throw the ones that are foremost in
this email and will add more as
You should checkout [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's what we have installed here. It gives you web access to voicemail as well as a web configuration tool (Asterisk Management Portal). For the POTS line,you will need an FXO card. We are a Digium reseller so I can get you what you need as far as hardware.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
line, you will need an FXO card. We are a _Digium reseller_ so I can get
[SNIP]
other questions, I just started using Asterisk about _2 weeks ago_. I know
[SNIP]
How do you end up being a Digium reseller after using Asterisk for two
weeks? Do you plan to
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:34:02 +0200 (CEST)
Peter Svensson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a device called a parlay made by a crowd
called
voxtream which will route the ISDN calls based on the
DID
and/or the callerid, before the call is
Hi All,
As a company, we are looking to rationalize our phone system
infrastructure and have come across using a digium quad port E1 PRI
cards in conjunction with the Asterisk PBX software. I'm hoping you'll
be able to answer the following questions and maybe give me a few
configuration
Hi
There is a device called a parlay made by a crowd called
voxtream which will route the ISDN calls based on the DID
and/or the callerid, before the call is answered.
It would be nice if this feature could be done in Asterisk
as well, but at this point in time, it first answers the
call.
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Ben Merrills waxed:
Hi,
I have a couple of questions about MeetMe and call queues. I'm still
pretty new to Asterisk, but already having to write a Service Center
call manager for it (which I might add, our director has agreed to make
open source!).
That's great news.
Hi,
I have a couple of questions about MeetMe and call queues. Im
still pretty new to Asterisk, but already having to write a Service Center call
manager for it (which I might add, our director has agreed to make open
source!).
MeetMe:
How can I get MeetMe (does it even do this)
Is this correct?
I see the 100 Trying on REGISTER frequently, but if it's not valid, we can
take it out. It serves no really effective purpose.
2. 10.3 Processing REGISTER requests. The 5th paragraph states that the
registrar has to know the set of domain(s) for which it maintains
bindings.
1. 8.2.6.1 Sending a Provisional Response says that UASs SHOULD NOT issue
a provisional response to non-INVITE requests.
From my message yesterday * appears to be sending a SIP/2.0 100 Trying to
X-Lite's REGISTER request before sending the SIP/2.0 200 OK message.
Is this correct?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Spencer) writes:
Is this correct?
I see the 100 Trying on REGISTER frequently, but if it's not valid, we can
take it out. It serves no really effective purpose.
I think that it's only on REGISTER messaegs that it shouldn't be
used. Perhaps previous RFCs didn't
3. I have another SIP account (sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) which I would like
to use within asterisk both for dialing out and for receiving calls.
I see that sip.conf has a line
register = [EMAIL PROTECTED]/1234
where 1234 is the local asterisk extension. From chan_sip.c, line 1390
42 matches
Mail list logo
