On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Kevin Brennan wrote:
> It happens servers come with twin GB NIC's, bonding is for redundancy not
> capacity. /Kev/
If all you're after is redunancy then have a look at failover rather than
bonding - you'll have nothing to worry about with regard to frames
potentially arriving
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Nick Bachmann wrote:
> You know you shouldn't (can't?) use the same interface for regular IP
> networking and TDMoE, right? The TDMoE should have an address-less NIC
> to itself and _really_ shouldn't run through a hub (an xover would be
> ideal). Bonding seems possible,
Kevin Brennan wrote:
Kevin Brennan wrote:
I am planning to configure * box A with PSTN interface to route faxes to
box B (running spandsp) over TDMoE. I am using 2xGb bonded NIC's for
connection between servers.
2GB?!? Remember, each voice channel you trunk across TDMoE is 64Kbps
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Kevin Brennan wrote:
> > Using iax trunking will also loose the advantage of being tdm all the way,
> > i.e. low latancies. If the rest of the setup is tdm there is a lot of
> > value in not going to voip for one hop.
>
> This is what I was thinking, FAX would be more reliabl
> Kevin Brennan wrote:
>
> > I am planning to configure * box A with PSTN interface to route faxes to
*
> >box B (running spandsp) over TDMoE. I am using 2xGb bonded NIC's for
> >connection between servers.
>
> 2GB?!? Remember, each voice channel you trunk across TDMoE is 64Kbps.
> While overprovis
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Jason Williams wrote:
>
> > I recommend you use Iax trunking rather than TDMoE this would scale
better.
>
> Using iax trunking will also loose the advantage of being tdm all the way,
> i.e. low latancies. If the rest of the setup is tdm there is a lot of
> value in not go
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Jason Williams wrote:
> I recommend you use Iax trunking rather than TDMoE this would scale better.
Using iax trunking will also loose the advantage of being tdm all the way,
i.e. low latancies. If the rest of the setup is tdm there is a lot of
value in not going to voip fo
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 19:50:36 -, Kevin Brennan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am planning to configure * box A with PSTN interface to route faxes to *
> box B (running spandsp) over TDMoE. I am using 2xGb bonded NIC's for
> connection between servers.
> Was wondering
> - does anybody have experi
Kevin Brennan wrote:
I am planning to configure * box A with PSTN interface to route faxes to *
box B (running spandsp) over TDMoE. I am using 2xGb bonded NIC's for
connection between servers.
2GB?!? Remember, each voice channel you trunk across TDMoE is 64Kbps.
While overprovisioning is laudable,
I am planning to configure * box A with PSTN interface to route faxes to *
box B (running spandsp) over TDMoE. I am using 2xGb bonded NIC's for
connection between servers.
Was wondering
- does anybody have experience with TDMoE over bonded interface - ie. does
it work ok?.
- does anybody have feed
10 matches
Mail list logo
