This message was sent to test a problem with the mailing list.
Please ignore it, and we apologize for any inconvenience.
Gracias
2012/7/14 rnew...@digium.com
This message was sent to test a problem with the mailing list.
Please ignore it, and we apologize for any inconvenience.
--
Maria Segovia
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
Okay
Sent from my iPod
On Jul 14, 2012, at 9:35 PM, rnew...@digium.com wrote:
This message was sent to test a problem with the mailing list.
Please ignore it, and we apologize for any inconvenience.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and
Hi every one,
Hello i am doing project on evaluating the sip proxy
performances like asterisk, openims and opensips using the traffic generator
SIPp.
I am using 2 computers of same configuration as SIPp clients one as uac and
other as uas... and one laptop for asterisk
On Aug 31, 2009, at 3:01 PM, David @ULC wrote:
To view the post and reply , I always to use below link..
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2009-August/thread.html
Any better way to access the forum ?
There are a variety of other locations that subscribe to the asterisk-
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:01 PM, David @ULCucoms2...@gmail.com wrote:
Any better way to access the forum ?
I think 'better' is pretty subjective, but I find reading the list
with GNUS using the
gmane.org NNTP service pretty easy going.
I'm also subscribed to the list with my gmail address, and
To view the post and reply , I always to use below link..
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2009-August/thread.htmlhttp://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2009-February/thread.html
Any better way to access the forum ?
___
--
I've replied to two emails in the last two days and haven't seen them yet.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
___
-- Bandwidth and
Doug Lytle wrote:
I've replied to two emails in the last two days and haven't seen them yet.
Please ignore, I must be getting blind.
I seem to have missed them.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Doug Lytle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug Lytle wrote:
I've replied to two emails in the last two days and haven't seen them yet.
Please ignore, I must be getting blind.
I seem to have missed them.
Settinu up bounce upon your post in list settings and then
Had recent problems with the list, so checking I get list mails now :)
Sorry for the inconvenience,
Johan
___
Johan Sandgren
Svep Design Center AB
Phone +46 46 192 722
Mobile +46 70 173 4152
Box 1233, 221 05 Lund, Sweden
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website
Had recent problems with the list, so checking I get list mails now :)
Sorry for the inconvenience,
Johan
___
Johan Sandgren
Svep Design Center AB
Phone +46 46 192 722
Mobile +46 70 173 4152
Box 1233, 221 05 Lund, Sweden
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website
Hi All,
i have asterisk with 9 SIP accounts on it.
i was wondering if theres a way to setup asterisk, to send the amount of
minutes each SIP account have spent incoming as well as outgoing and if
possible the number it called!
any advice?!
any help would truly be appreciated..!
thanks in
You can check asterisk CDR (call detail records).
You should have a csv file in /var/log/asterisk/cdr-csv/Master.csv
You can also configure it to write the CDR in a database
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+cdr+mysql
Then you can just write a script that will look at your database and
send
This arrived today: July 16th. (but I also receive older messages;
oldest is from july 4th)
Looking at the headers of the messages it always appears to be the last step
that is delayed. (that is the delivery to my local mail server).
Example below:
Received: from viadoos.rzuiderven.nl ([unix
m c
X-pstn-addresses: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [db-null]
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] List delays
X-BeenThere: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
List-Id
/99.9 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108
P:95.9108
M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 3 (1.:1.) s fc lc gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [db-null]
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] List delays
X-BeenThere: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
X-Mailman-Version
Don Kelly wrote:
Although Dimitri's plea to the 'Admin' may not have been carefully worded,
it would be nice to have some feedback on this issue. As far as I can tell,
there has been no response by moderators/admin to the messages regarding
list delays, including messages that I have sent
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 09:34:51AM -0600, Stephen Bosch said:
Walt Reed wrote:
No, as I explained before with the reasons why, please don't post them
here. Send them DIRECTLY to the list admins. It is 100% off topic to
keep discussing a list administration / mail delivery problem here.
Kevin P. Fleming on 12 July 2007 19:52 wrote:
8 SNIP! 8-
we haven't yet found the root cause of
the delays, but it does appear to be a large number of subscriber
addresses that fail to resolve via DNS (but 'soft failures' (timeouts),
not hard failures).
As we get through the
Walt Reed wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 09:34:51AM -0600, Stephen Bosch said:
Walt Reed wrote:
No, as I explained before with the reasons why, please don't post them
here. Send them DIRECTLY to the list admins. It is 100% off topic to
keep discussing a list administration / mail delivery
Most of the users using this list do not experience the issue
you are having, rather than insult the admins, please trouble
shoot and if you cannot, at least post headers so others can.
Received: from lists.digium.com ([216.207.245.17]) by
nlpiport01.prodigy.net.mx
with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jul
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:37:29 +0200, Christian Victor wrote
I have the same problem. My mail sent yesterday around 20:00h and it still
not arrived at the list. Sent from germany by the way.
Christian
email delays here are about 8 days. I don't expect to see this until 19th July
--
Bill
On 7/11/07, Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
email delays here are about 8 days. I don't expect to see this until 19th July
When you do get the message, please reply with the email headers, so
we have some chance of tracking down the problem. For example, below
are the headers from your
No, as I explained before with the reasons why, please don't post them
here. Send them DIRECTLY to the list admins. It is 100% off topic to
keep discussing a list administration / mail delivery problem here.
List USERS can not help you.
Considering that the vast majority of users do not
Walter,
I know you just said that list users can not help with this problem,
however I must beg to differ with you. The information that you just
provided is a big help, if people take your advice about the
configuration of their internal systems. So in one way it is off the
topic of Asterisk,
Walt Reed wrote:
No, as I explained before with the reasons why, please don't post them
here. Send them DIRECTLY to the list admins. It is 100% off topic to
keep discussing a list administration / mail delivery problem here.
List USERS can not help you.
Considering that the vast
Most of the users using this list do not experience the issue you are having,
rather than insult the admins, please trouble shoot and if you cannot, at least
post headers so others can.
-- Original Message --
From: Dimitri Volski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, please don't post headers. Headers tell us nothing. They don't tell
us such things such as DNS resolution problems, routing problems, if the
recipient's server is tempfailing, etc. The ONLY thing really useful
are the mail logs from the list server. The only people that have access
are Digium
, couple from 30th, up until the 5th of July,
nothing of today's, or, well, for the last 5 days.
Admin, get your act together !
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users shows:
asterisk-users list run by malcolmd at digium.com, kpfleming at
digium.com .
I saw a comment on #asterisk
At 02:22 AM 7/10/2007, you wrote:
Considering that so Very Very few subscribers are having delays, there
is a 99% chance that you have something messed up on your side - DNS
reliability, your network, one or more of your MX servers, some goofy
anti-spam scheme, etc.
Or maybe it's just a VERY
John Faubion wrote:
Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev
I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages. I've
usually seen mine in a few minutes. We'll see
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Faubion
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 9:58 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] List delays
Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 09:57 -0500, John Faubion wrote:
Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev
I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages. I've
usually seen mine
There is definitely something wrong with this list.
I have my emails sorted by date, and every day, the emails do not just
come on top, but get slotted in. Today (10 July 2007), I received about
6 emails from 29th of June, couple from 30th, up until the 5th of July,
nothing of today's, or,
Am Mittwoch, den 04.07.2007, 11:00 -0400 schrieb Noah Miller:
Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev
list seems fine!
I'm getting new messages within a matter of minutes. I dunno.
As
Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev
list seems fine!
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither
Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev
list seems fine!
I'm getting new messages within a matter of minutes. I dunno.
- Noah
___
--Bandwidth
I have the same problem. My mail sent yesterday around 20:00h and it still
not arrived at the list. Sent from germany by the way.
Christian
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To
Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev
I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages. I've
usually seen mine in a few minutes. We'll see about this one... sent July
4th
Doug Lytle wrote:
Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev
list seems fine!
Mine arrive instantly.
-Stephen-
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation
Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev
I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages.
I've
usually seen mine in a few minutes. We'll see about this one... sent July
4th
John Faubion wrote:
Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev
I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages.
I've
usually seen mine in a few minutes.
Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average
delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev
list seems fine!
Interesting, since I am only able to see the replies from the archives,
I took note of the headers as Drew Gibson suggested.
John Faubion wrote:
Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev
I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages. I've
usually seen mine in a few minutes. We'll see about
Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
John Faubion wrote:
Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev
I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages. I've
usually seen mine in a
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:54:08AM +0100, Chris Bagnall wrote:
3. a list of bogus entries..so when you look at it, you know it's a
fake phone number...one that recently came in that got me thinking
this was 407 111 .
I don't know much about the legal position over the other side of the
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Steve
Totaro
*Sent:* Thursday, May 10, 2007 7:26 AM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* RE: [asterisk-users] List of telemarketers??
Things that will make your idea difficult.
Although telemarketers are supposed
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
Johnson
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 8:02 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] List of telemarketers??
Actually have downloaded a database of over
3. a list of bogus entries..so when you look at it, you know it's a
fake phone number...one that recently came in that got me thinking
this was 407 111 .
I don't know much about the legal position over the other side of the pond, but
I'm pretty sure that in the UK caller ID spoofing is
Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Sat May 12 20:54:08 2007
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] List of telemarketers??
3. a list of bogus entries..so when you look at it, you know it's
: [asterisk-users] List of telemarketers??
Thanks everyone for the responses, encouragement and offers to help.
I will get started on this shortly and circle back with you guys.
If someone has a starter list, it would help jump start the
efforts/motivation :-)
Ritesh
On 5/9/07, Noah Miller
It sounds pretty interesting to do. On a technical point of view, I
believe a simple HTTP interface would be nice, and additionally a nightly
rsync for high load sites who wish to run a local cache.
About how to set up a community blacklist for telephone numbers and its
legal implications,
Not sure about the rest of the world, but here in Italy virtyually all
telemarketers will call using a blank caller-id, so you have no way to
know who they are and/or call back.
Spoofing might be a problem, though I believe it will take a bit of users
for the blacklist to be on
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Totaro
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 7:26 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] List of telemarketers??
Things that will make your idea difficult.
Although telemarketers are supposed to send
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* RE: [asterisk-users] List of telemarketers??
Things that will make your idea difficult.
Although telemarketers are supposed to send their CallerID, many if not
most, I see Unkown. I believe this is illegal but I see it many
Does anyone know if there is a known list of telemarketers?
Something like http://whocalled.us/ with an easier access?
We could all benefit if there was such a thing :-)
If there is enough interest, I could put up a database that everyone can
benefit from.
I just need some suggestions on:
(1)
Regarding (2) - you can either provide a realtime query service supporting
web service interface which can be consumed using virtually any programming
language and it would be very easy to build an AGI script around it.
the second option would be to periodically update a flat file (csv) and
Hi Ritesh -
Does anyone know if there is a known list of telemarketers?
Something like http://whocalled.us/ with an easier access?
We could all benefit if there was such a thing :-)
If there is enough interest, I could put up a database that everyone can
benefit from.
I just need some
Ritesh Agrawal wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a known list of telemarketers?
Something like http://whocalled.us/ with an easier access?
We could all benefit if there was such a thing :-)
If there is enough interest, I could put up a database that everyone
can benefit from.
I just need
Noah Miller wrote:
Wow, that's a generous offer. I like the idea of a blacklist for
telemarketers. It's bound to be more effective than an RBL for
spammers! One thing to note: this may end up being a non-US database.
Here in the US, I've experienced great success with the
www.donotcall.gov
Thanks everyone for the responses, encouragement and offers to help.
I will get started on this shortly and circle back with you guys.
If someone has a starter list, it would help jump start the
efforts/motivation :-)
Ritesh
On 5/9/07, Noah Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ritesh -
Does
Yuan Liu wrote:
My multiple postings to this list this morning got garbled in
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/, and don't come back from
list. (e.g.,
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2007-February/179315.html) I
thought it was Hotmail, so I saved one
My multiple postings to this list this morning got garbled in
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/, and don't come back from
list. (e.g.,
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2007-February/179315.html) I
thought it was Hotmail, so I saved one outgoing mail and checked
My multiple postings to this list this morning got garbled in
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/, and don't come back from
list. (e.g.,
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2007-February/179315.html) I
thought it was Hotmail, so I saved one outgoing mail and checked
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:45:30AM -0800, Yuan Liu said:
My multiple postings to this list this morning got garbled in
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/, and don't come back
from list. (e.g.,
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2007-February/179315.html)
I thought
Im not getting any asterisk emails this morning even
though they are being delivered to the archives
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2006-October/thread.html
Cheers,
Dean
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation
Hi friends,Thank you to all for response. At last, I got these below links which contains Ethernet port and RJ11 port. http://www.voipsupply.com/product_info.php?products_id=307
Is there a list or matrix somewhere that shows what codec can be
transcoded? I am playing with different allowed codecs between my
asterisk box and some of my providers testing voice quality and
bandwidth usage on my cable connection, and I occassionally run into an
issue where asterisk cannot
Robert Webb wrote:
Is there a list or matrix somewhere that shows what codec can be
transcoded? I am playing with different allowed codecs between my
asterisk box and some of my providers testing voice quality and
bandwidth usage on my cable connection, and I occassionally run into an
issue
Does anyone know if their are rules that this list is supposed to be
following? It doesn't appear to be moderated, so I realize that such
rules would be self-enforced, but it still might be good to agree on
some. Likewise, we could agree on none. That works also. Any
thoughts?
Some
Is anyone with a yahoo account having problems
recieving emails from the list. I have not recieved
any emails in about 8 hours and I posted something
about 3 hours ago. If anyone knows please email to
asteriskdigium _AT_ yahoo.com
Thanks
__
Do You
I'm guessing Digium is having issues with their mailing list. I just
received the following:
Your membership in the mailing list Asterisk-Users has been disabled
due to excessive bounces The last bounce received from you was dated
10-Feb-2005. You will not get any more messages from this list
last message I have received was on1/27/06.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-Users] List Broken Again?
last message I have received was on1/27/06.
winmail.dat___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http
The list is very quiet today - almost too quiet
PaulH
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 15:28 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The list is very quiet today - almost too quiet
Yes, I have noticed the same thing. I have sent about 4 or 5 messages to
the list, and the first one I sent (about 5 hrs ago) has yet to arrive.
Perhaps there is something going on
From the console if there a way (in debugging or someting) to get a
list of currently defined Global/Local variables like CALLERID, etc?
Thanks,
Michael
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To
I went from a Vic20 to a CPC6128...both great items
PaulH
- Original Message -
From: Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users
-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] List of Motherboards or Servers that are
testedok with Asterisk and Digium boards
Man, looking back it was a gas - the 16k wobbly rampack. You spent 30
minutes looking at a blank screen whilst
: 99.997965
i'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.5
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:48:03 +0200
From: George Vagenas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] List of Motherboards or Servers that are
tested ok with Asterisk and Digium boards
To: asterisk-users
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Asterisk is cool. But maybe not that cool.
Hey, don't you know that the dev team gets all the cool toys ;)
You can tell I started coding on a ZX81.
Woohoo go the ZX81!!!
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
___
Man, looking back it was a gas - the 16k wobbly rampack. You spent 30
minutes looking at a blank screen whilst loading Horace goes skiing
(or some other c*appy game you wanted to hack) making incantations to
the tapedrive god in the vain hope that you wouldn't get an I/O error.
It wasn't a
Hi all,
Can i find somewhere a list of tested motherboards or server that works
fine with Asterisk and Digium boards? Digium has a page that mention
some models that are already known don't work fine with the Digium
cards, but i am looking for something more updated. Any clue?
Thanks
George
-- Worst: 99.987793 -- Average: 99.997965
i'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.5
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:48:03 +0200
From: George Vagenas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] List of Motherboards or Servers that are
tested ok with Asterisk and Digium boards
To: asterisk-users
%100.00% 100.00%100.00% 99.987793% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%--- Results after 12 passes ---Best: 100.00 -- Worst: 99.987793
-- Average: 99.997965i'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.5 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:48:03 +0200 From: George Vagenas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] List
of Motherboards or Servers that are testedok with Asterisk and Digium boards
I have TE110Prunnig fine in:
S5112G2NR
http://www.tyan.com/products/html/tomcati7210_spec.html
On 11/16/05, Robbie
Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm just bought
: 99.997965
i'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.5
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:48:03 +0200
From: George Vagenas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] List of Motherboards or Servers that are
tested ok with Asterisk and Digium boards
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED
% 100.00% 100.00%
--- Results after 12 passes ---
Best: 100.00 -- Worst: 99.987793 -- Average: 99.997965
i'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.5
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:48:03 +0200
From: George Vagenas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] List of Motherboards or Servers
] 1.5
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:48:03 +0200
From: George Vagenas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] List of Motherboards or Servers that are
tested ok with Asterisk and Digium boards
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text
Vagenas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] List of Motherboards or Servers that are
tested ok with Asterisk and Digium boards
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi all,
Can i find somewhere a list
%
--- Results after 12 passes ---
Best: 100.00 -- Worst: 99.987793 -- Average: 99.997965
i'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.5
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:48:03 +0200
From: George Vagenas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] List of Motherboards or Servers that are
tested ok with Asterisk
- Original Message -
From: Ronald Wiplinger
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 6:04 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] list in asterisk cli is getting too long
How can I use something like|morein CLI ?
The lists are getting too
Hilton Williams wrote:
- Original Message - From: Ronald Wiplinger To: Asterisk Users
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005
6:04 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] list in asterisk cli is getting too long
How can I use something like|morein CLI
How can I use something like|morein CLI ?
The lists are getting too long, like sip show users
bye
Ronald Wiplinger
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To
Please excuse my ignorance but doesn't the VOIP/PSTN gateway
(Broadvoice,VP Connect) have to support T38 in order for an T38
supported ATA to do any good ?
Yes. BroadVox supports it. I've started a wiki page to track
providers who do, mainly because such providers are so hard to find,
and
, 7 August 2005 5:29 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] list of T.38 providers on wiki: please
contribute
Please excuse my ignorance but doesn't the VOIP/PSTN gateway
(Broadvoice,VP Connect) have to support T38 in order for an T38
supported ATA to do any
Just checking to see if the list server died again.. been a few hours
since I sent something to the list and I usually see it by now..
begin:vcard
fn:Matt Hess
n:Hess;Matt
org:LiveWire Networks
adr;dom:;;4577 Pecos St;Denver;CO;80211
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Sr. Network Engineer
Is it my imagination or did I just drop off the list for several days
somehow... I didn't get any posts since Friday...
rhuddleston.vcf
Description: Binary data
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
Huddleston, Robert wrote:
Is it my imagination or did I just drop off the list for several days
somehow... I didn't get any posts since Friday...
___
Asterisk-Users
1 - 100 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
