Having just returned from four days at the VON show in Santa Clara, I
thought I would submit a "highlights" message. I hope others who attended
the show will take the opportunity to add, as there was far more to see than
I can cover on my own.
[VoIP IS BIG]
First, I have to say that VoIP is BIG.
Steven Sokol wrote:
Having just returned from four days at the VON show in Santa Clara, I
thought I would submit a "highlights" message. I hope others who attended
the show will take the opportunity to add, as there was far more to see than
I can cover on my own.
Thank you for a good report!
Comme
On Apr 5, 2004, at 12:10 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
Members of the IETF added information on the to-be-standardized
standard,
meaning that SIP with TLS over TCP will be mandatory. We need to start
working
on TCP and TLS support.
Could someone explain to me why anyone in their right mind would e
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Scott Laird wrote:
> Could someone explain to me why anyone in their right mind would ever
> want to run VoIP (or any lossy real-time data) over TCP? Unless I'm
> missing something, the effects of packet loss would be almost perfectly
> pessimal. Every time you lose a pa
> On Apr 5, 2004, at 12:10 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> > Members of the IETF added information on the to-be-standardized
> > standard,
> > meaning that SIP with TLS over TCP will be mandatory. We need to start
> > working
> > on TCP and TLS support.
>
> Could someone explain to me why anyone in
On Apr 5, 2004, at 12:34 PM, James Golovich wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Scott Laird wrote:
Could someone explain to me why anyone in their right mind would ever
want to run VoIP (or any lossy real-time data) over TCP? Unless I'm
missing something, the effects of packet loss would be almost
perfec
Scott Laird wrote:
On Apr 5, 2004, at 12:10 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
Members of the IETF added information on the to-be-standardized standard,
meaning that SIP with TLS over TCP will be mandatory. We need to start
working
on TCP and TLS support.
Could someone explain to me why anyone in the
James Golovich wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Scott Laird wrote:
Could someone explain to me why anyone in their right mind would ever
want to run VoIP (or any lossy real-time data) over TCP? Unless I'm
missing something, the effects of packet loss would be almost perfectly
pessimal. Every time
Steven Sokol wrote:
I think Olle Johansson took pictures of the event.
They may already be on the WiKi in fact.
I've uploaded the pictures without editing at
http://www.voip-forum.com/asterisk/von2004/index.htm
Enjoy!
/O
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
On Apr 5, 2004, at 12:49 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
SRTP protects RTP/UDP media with encryption.
There are concerns that sending positioning within SIP/UDP will reveal
private detailes, like position. Hence the encryption requirement.
The position data needs to be given by the ISP in DHCP config
il 05, 2004 3:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Spring VON Wrap Up
Steven Sokol wrote:
> I think Olle Johansson took pictures of the event.
> They may already be on the WiKi in fact.
I've uploaded the pictures without editing at
http://www.voip-forum.com/
At 01:44 PM 4/5/2004, you wrote:
Having just returned from four days at the VON show in Santa Clara, I
thought I would submit a "highlights" message. I hope others who attended
the show will take the opportunity to add, as there was far more to see than
I can cover on my own.
Was there any aggress
Scott Laird wrote:
On Apr 5, 2004, at 12:49 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
SRTP protects RTP/UDP media with encryption.
There are concerns that sending positioning within SIP/UDP will reveal
private detailes, like position. Hence the encryption requirement.
The position data needs to be given by th
Mark Messmore, Technical Support, University Telcom Inc. wrote:
K...maybe this was stated earlier in the conversation...but what's the
deal with the phone? Or was this phone just being carried around by
everyone and ripped apart?
Old Bell Phone + IAXy + 802.11b card + Batteries = Homemade WiSI
Scott Laird wrote:
2. Is anyone working on SRTP for Asterisk? Are there any SRTP clients
out there?
Checked again, the vovida.org and the sourceforge one are the same.
And here's the good news: THey're using a BSD license.
That means we can incorporate this library into Asterisk without a
licen
> Was there any aggressive pricing given for nationwide voip LD?
Level3 had several products, one they called Enhanced which was supposed
to also include E911 service. They quoted me about $.01 per minute
inbound or outbound nation wide. They said they support the top 300
cities in the US and, of
Bob Klepfer wrote:
Mark Messmore, Technical Support, University Telcom Inc. wrote:
K...maybe this was stated earlier in the conversation...but what's the
deal with the phone? Or was this phone just being carried around by
everyone and ripped apart?
Old Bell Phone + IAXy + 802.11b card + Batte
On 05-04 14:35, Steven Sokol wrote:
> TCP/TLS would be used for the SIP messaging which handles call setup,
> teardown, and other non-Realtime functions. The voice stream will still be
> handled via RTP which is a UDP-based protocol.
>
> The reason for doing the call setup as TCP is to allow for
18 matches
Mail list logo
