On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Michael L. Young wrote:
I think the clue is actually right there in the error message.
You say that port 1 is an FXO module? Then your signaling is set wrong. The
signaling should be fxsks.
For port 4, it should be fxoks.
Remember, that in the configuration files, the
- Original Message -
> From: "Remco Barendse"
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
>
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 5:27:27 AM
> Subject: [asterisk-users] TDM400 FXO stopped working
> Hi list
>
> I have 2 server
Remco,
Please try temporarily removing all WCTDM parameters you might have in
/etc/modprobe.d/dahdi.conf. Then try the same process. You also may
want to try "service dahdi restart" or equivalent for your distribution.
If none helps I would file a bug report.
Regards,
Vladimir
On 9/26/2011
Hi Vladimir,
I tried the steps as you wrote them but i just get the same error :
Channel map:
Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 01)
Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 04)
2 channels to configure.
Changing signalling on channel 1 fr
Remco,
In my experience something could have gone wrong with the parameters you pass
to WCTDM driver.
You may want to check your /etc/modprobe.d/dahdi.conf
Try loading the driver manually as follows:
1. Stop Asterisk
2. modprobe -r wctdm
3. modprobe wctdm
4. dahdi_cfg -vvv
Good luck,
Vladimir
Hi list
I have 2 servers with a TDM400 card, port 1 populated by an FXO (red)
module), port 4 populated with an FXS module. I am using dahdi
linux and tools 2.5.0.1. The servers are running CentOS 4 and the other
box CentOS 6.
Both modules have been working fine but recently stopped working,
Hi Mike,
may I ask where you purchsded your A200 card from?
I managed to get one of the pre-production cards from Sangoma back in November,
however there are some bugs with it and I am unable to flash the
firmware or run latest drivers with it.
Sure, I got it at:
http://www.telephonyware.com/te
On 3/22/06, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hadley Rich wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have hit a wall configuring a TDM400, I have set these up before without
> > issue but today I just can't seem to figure out what I am doing wrong.
>
>
> I couldn't make TDM400/FXO work on my
On Thursday 23 March 2006 02:08, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
> > I have hit a wall configuring a TDM400, I have set these up before
> > without issue but today I just can't seem to figure out what I am doing
> > wrong.
>
> I couldn't make TDM400/FXO work on my 1.2.5 Asterisk either. It wouldn't
Hadley Rich wrote:
Hi all,
I have hit a wall configuring a TDM400, I have set these up before without
issue but today I just can't seem to figure out what I am doing wrong.
I couldn't make TDM400/FXO work on my 1.2.5 Asterisk either. It wouldn't
answer calls, for unknown reasons. I gave up
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 16:24, Hadley Rich wrote:
> I have hit a wall configuring a TDM400, I have set these up before without
> issue but today I just can't seem to figure out what I am doing wrong.
>
> On an incoming call the following is produced in the Asterisk console with
> verbose 4
>
>
Hi all,
I have hit a wall configuring a TDM400, I have set these up before without
issue but today I just can't seem to figure out what I am doing wrong.
On an incoming call the following is produced in the Asterisk console with
verbose 4
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1'
Mar 22 16:12
Hello,
I'm rather new to Asterisk so I'm in the wrong group for this issue please
let me know.
I'm using TDM400p with 2 FXO's on channel 3-4, Fedora Core4, 2.6, udev, and
I have the card on it's own IRQ
when I drop a .call file into /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing I see the
following on the CLI...
2005/12/23, Kerry Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Possible polarity problem with the
jack.
-KerrySo I should to check I have +48VDC on the phone line (red wire is +). Right?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users m
2005/12/24, James B. MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
A problem I had, although different than this, was caused by having/etc/zapata.conf as koolstart when they should have been loopstart.Might be something else to try :).JESI also tried with loopstart in
zaptel.conf and zapata.conf, but without succe
2005/12/23, Rich Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm really puzzled and I don't know why it is behaving this way. Any hints?Are you sure the phones and system at work are not electronic/digital sets?Yes, I'm sure phones and lines are both analogic (POTS).
___
Filippo Carone wrote:
I'm really puzzled and I don't know why it is behaving this way. Any
hints?
Cheers,
fc
A problem I had, although different than this, was caused by having
/etc/zapata.conf as koolstart when they should have been loopstart.
Might be something else to try :).
JES
> I'm experiencing a very weird behaviour with my tdm400 with two fxo and one
> fxs
modules. I setup my current
> configuration at home, I tried it and it works flawlessly. I moved the
> computer to my
office and plugged the fxo to
> the wall plug, but when I tried to call I got a busy signal.
Possible polarity problem with the
jack.
-Kerry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filippo
CaroneSent: Friday, December 23, 2005 2:16 PMTo:
asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] tdm400 fxo
problem
Hi,I'm experiencing a very weird beha
Hi,I'm experiencing a very weird behaviour with my tdm400 with two fxo and one fxs modules. I setup my current configuration at home, I tried it and it works flawlessly. I moved the computer to my office and plugged the fxo to the wall plug, but when I tried to call I got a busy signal. I attached
Tom Vile wrote:
Everyone,
I have a TDM400 REV I Ver 1 board and am having an issue with 1 of the
4 FXO channels. FXO 1 always has clicks, pops and echo but the others
are crystal clear all of the time. The card is on its own IRQ zztest
shows 100% to 99.98% and is getting 1000 int per second.
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Vile
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 6:31 PM
To: Rich Adamson
Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 FXO port 1 only problem.
The problem is not the module though its on the port its plugged into.
I can move the
The problem is not the module though its on the port its plugged into.
I can move the module to another port and it works fine, so I was
thinking it is the board. I guess I will call Digium and see what
they say.
thanks
On 11/22/05, Rich Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a TDM400
> I have a TDM400 REV I Ver 1 board and am having an issue with 1 of the
> 4 FXO channels. FXO 1 always has clicks, pops and echo but the others
> are crystal clear all of the time. The card is on its own IRQ zztest
> shows 100% to 99.98% and is getting 1000 int per second. Its not
> dropping
Everyone,
I have a TDM400 REV I Ver 1 board and am having an issue with 1 of the
4 FXO channels. FXO 1 always has clicks, pops and echo but the others
are crystal clear all of the time. The card is on its own IRQ zztest
shows 100% to 99.98% and is getting 1000 int per second. Its not
dropping
> A nasty screech. That's what callers here sometimes when they dial into
> my FXO port from the PSTN. But usually, it works OK.
>
> Is this common?
That was fairly common on the original TDM cards (rev E/F) with older
drivers. The problem would usually show up after the card has been
in oper
I just installed FXO module in an older TDM400 card in port 1 and had
problems. Moved it to port 2 and everything is fine now.
- Dustin -
Bill Michaelson wrote:
A nasty screech. That's what callers here sometimes when they dial
into my FXO port from the PSTN. But usually, it works OK.
Is
A nasty screech. That's what callers here sometimes when they dial into
my FXO port from the PSTN. But usually, it works OK.
Is this common?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lis
Considering that I am a user 'down under' that's even funnier.
PaulH
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, Novembe
On Monday 07 November 2005 12:57, George Gardiner wrote:
> Most modern installations/buildings are wired with RJ45, as are the patch
> panels. RJ12 is a real pain - I had to chop up patch leads and put RJ12
> sockets on the end. Very messy and a waste of time.
We just moved in to a new buildi
Most modern installations/buildings are wired with RJ45, as are the patch panels. RJ12 is a real pain - I had to chop up patch leads and put RJ12 sockets on the end. Very messy and a waste of time.
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:04:48 -0500, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:> On Sunday 06 November 2005 21:46
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was pretty unhappy to see that the new cards had RJ12 sockets - you can
put RJ12 into RJ45, but not the other way round...
But I do know that a lot of people would ask if RJ12 would fit, so it might
have been to cut down on support calls.
Definitely not :-) It was do
Patching in buildings with rj45 sockets.
PaulH
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Kohlsmith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 FXO vs FXS Interrupt performance
> On Sunday 06 November 2005 21:4
On Sunday 06 November 2005 21:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was pretty unhappy to see that the new cards had RJ12 sockets - you can
> put RJ12 into RJ45, but not the other way round...
You've gotta be shitting me.
Why on earth do you want RJ45 jacks for POTS connections? Sure it fits but
it'
Kevin Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 FXO vs FXS Interrupt performance
> Rich Adamson wrote:
>
> >>>"Brand n
Rich Adamson wrote:
"Brand new " cards, from a recommended Digium distributor.
What rev? It'll say "Freshmaker Rev x" on the blue board. I *think* it was
corrected around Rev E or F IIRC, but I don't know for certain.
I spoke with Digium and the distributor tech support on it -
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Saturday 05 November 2005 22:33, Gary Eck wrote:
I have popping with FSO modules only on channel 1 - the other 3 channels
are clear.
That was corrected a long time ago. You must have an older rev TDM400 carrier
card.
-A.
Well, it must be back. I had
> > "Brand new " cards, from a recommended Digium distributor.
>
> What rev? It'll say "Freshmaker Rev x" on the blue board. I *think* it was
> corrected around Rev E or F IIRC, but I don't know for certain.
>
> > I spoke with Digium and the distributor tech support on it - gave them
> > seri
On Saturday 05 November 2005 23:24, Dustin Goodwin wrote:
> I do have an older card. I believe I purchased it before the FXO module
> started shipping. Can I do anything to resolve or this hw problem with
> the card?
Contact Digium and get the carrier card replaced under warranty.
-A.
___
On Saturday 05 November 2005 23:03, Gary Eck wrote:
> "Brand new " cards, from a recommended Digium distributor.
What rev? It'll say "Freshmaker Rev x" on the blue board. I *think* it was
corrected around Rev E or F IIRC, but I don't know for certain.
> I spoke with Digium and the distributor
I do have an older card. I believe I purchased it before the FXO module
started shipping. Can I do anything to resolve or this hw problem with
the card?
- Dustin -
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Saturday 05 November 2005 22:33, Gary Eck wrote:
I have popping with FSO modules only on channel
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew
Kohlsmith
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 10:45 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 FXO vs FXS Interrupt performance
On Saturday 05 November 2005 22:33, Gary Eck wrote:
> I have pop
On Saturday 05 November 2005 22:33, Gary Eck wrote:
> I have popping with FSO modules only on channel 1 - the other 3 channels
> are clear.
That was corrected a long time ago. You must have an older rev TDM400 carrier
card.
-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Col
Goodwin
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 4:01 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 FXO vs FXS Interrupt performance
I have read a lot online about interrupt related cracking/popping noise
issues on Digium cards. The weird thing is I
On Saturday 05 November 2005 15:55, Dustin Goodwin wrote:
> I have read a lot online about interrupt related cracking/popping noise
> issues on Digium cards. The weird thing is I experience it with the FXO
> port on my TDM card but not on the FXS. Does this make any sense? I had
> assumed an interr
I have read a lot online about interrupt related cracking/popping noise
issues on Digium cards. The weird thing is I experience it with the FXO
port on my TDM card but not on the FXS. Does this make any sense? I had
assumed an interrupt problem. But if the FXS port is working why would
the FXO
> Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
If your install doesn't have to be 24/7, cron a reboot at 2 am. Since I did,
it's a nonissue for me.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/
> I am having an issue where my TDM400P FXO module stops acknowledging
> incoming rings after running for about a month.
> My system is an AMD Athlon XP 2800+ with 256MB RAM, ABIT NF7S
> motherboard, Slackware (Linux 2.4.26) and Asterisk from CVS Stable (1.0).
>
> All outbound dialing continues to
I am having an issue where my TDM400P FXO module stops acknowledging
incoming rings after running for about a month.
My system is an AMD Athlon XP 2800+ with 256MB RAM, ABIT NF7S
motherboard, Slackware (Linux 2.4.26) and Asterisk from CVS Stable (1.0).
All outbound dialing continues to work during
>Ian,
>
>The code I am running includes this patch already (I checked it out
from CVS on the 21st), and it does not seem to resolve the problem on my
line.
>
>The patch I have posted earlier today, which causes the Caller-ID code
to abort after 15 seconds, does resolve the problem.
Hmmm, it sh
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 04:09:21PM -, Ian D. Wlloughby wrote:
>I submitted a patch for this which was included in the the CVS build of
>the 19th of November.
>
>See bug http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002909
Ian,
The code I am running includes this patch already (I checked it
Hi Will,
Having read through the Caller ID code, it appears that this is indeed
what is happening. The Caller ID code doesn't contain any logic to
trigger a timeout if no Caller ID data stream is found, or if a stream
starts and does not terminate.
I submitted a patch for this which was incl
Having read through the Caller ID code, it appears that this is indeed what is
happening. The Caller ID code doesn't contain any logic to trigger a timeout
if no Caller ID data stream is found, or if a stream starts and does not
terminate.
The attached patch causes the Caller ID to timeout aft
H.
Is it possible that the line is detecting a polarity event, decided that the
line is ringing and started listening for a non-existant V23 data stream, and
then the line has not in fact rung?
This would mark the line as busy (and unable to handle an outgoing call) but
when a call did in fa
I have a bit of a weird problem that I'm having great trouble debugging.
I have a TDM400P PCI card with two FXO and two FXS modules. Both FXO modules
are connected to BT lines here in the UK. Both BT lines have V23 Caller-ID,
which works fine with Asterisk. Both asterisk and zaptel are fresh from
Thanks for the reply Mark. When do you expect to ship and are you taking
orders?
Gene
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Spencer
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 9:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 FXO
> Will there be no FXO daughter boards for the TDM400?
There will be. Units are again in production after having an issue that
had us stuck for about 2 months.
Mark
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/list
Thud!
Will there be no FXO daughter boards for
the TDM400?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Gene Kochanowsky
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004
7:55 PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400
FXO???
Any word/news on the
Any word/news on the progress availability of the FXO daughter
boards?
Gene
59 matches
Mail list logo
