x-tad-bigger1 RAID5 server with 2 SATA HDs/x-tad-bigger
Last I heard, RAID-5 requires three or more hard drives :P
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or
I am looking to create an asterisk system with failover in
case one asterisk box fails.
Current hardware:
2 asterisk boxes (P3 950mhz gateway server and an older dell)
w/128MB RAM each, latest release of asterisk/centos.
1 RAID5 server with 2 SATA HDs
Goals:
I want Asterisk to
I would say if you want true redundancy.. rsync your files on each
system.. have RAID on each system, and use a load balancing switch.
Incidentally... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nortel? (eek did I just utter a bad word?)
On Apr 5, 2005 7:53 AM, Infocus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking to
mmm one other thought.. the load balancing switch needs to support A)
failover and B) stream assocciation (so that it keeps you on the same
* server as long as you are sending packets!)
On Apr 5, 2005 8:25 AM, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say if you want true redundancy.. rsync your
?
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 5:26 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] fault tolerant asterisk system
mmm one other thought
Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] fault tolerant asterisk system
mmm one other thought.. the load balancing switch needs to support A)
failover and B) stream assocciation (so that it keeps you on the same
* server as long as you are sending packets!)
On Apr 5, 2005 8:25 AM, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED
-Users] fault tolerant asterisk system
mmm one other thought.. the load balancing switch needs to support A)
failover and B) stream assocciation (so that it keeps you on the same
* server as long as you are sending packets!)
On Apr 5, 2005 8:25 AM, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say if you want
