Re: [asterisk-users] codec negotiation or transcoding issue

2017-03-15 Thread Lợi Đặng
Asterisk might be unable to transcode rtp type from downstream to upstream, or vice versa. There's a bug reported here, for asterisk 12 or above, using chan_sip. https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-25676 It says that you could avoid the bug by using chan_pjsip, but you still encounter

[asterisk-users] codec negotiation or transcoding issue

2017-03-14 Thread Faheem Muhammad
Hi, I'm facing strange issue while establishing inbound calls from SIP trunks. Provider A is sending (G729,Alaw,uLaw) offer and asterisk dial the peer with its preferred codec order(G729,aLaw, uLaw). The peer's phone send the codec list as (uLaw, speex) in 200 OK replay. The Peer's phone has

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation problem

2013-06-14 Thread research
Hi Matt Thanks for your response. I have tried with two GXV3175 with same result. Let me dig deep on this to find out the route cause Sam Matthew Jordan wrote: On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:04 PM, resea...@businesstz.com wrote: Hi there I have asterisk 10.11.1 which seems to have problem

[asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation problem

2013-06-13 Thread research
Hi there I have asterisk 10.11.1 which seems to have problem negotiating codec. Scenario: SIP PHONE1 (XLite) extension 1003, allowed codecs alaw, h263p and SIP phone2 (Grandstream GXV3175) extension 1004, allowed codec alaw, h263p. I have tried similar combination of codecs and SIP phone but

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation problem

2013-06-13 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:04 PM, resea...@businesstz.com wrote: Hi there I have asterisk 10.11.1 which seems to have problem negotiating codec. Scenario: SIP PHONE1 (XLite) extension 1003, allowed codecs alaw, h263p and SIP phone2 (Grandstream GXV3175) extension 1004, allowed codec alaw,

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation issue (no audio format found to offer)

2011-08-04 Thread David Vossel
- Original Message - From: Ryan McGuire rdmcguir...@gmail.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2011 9:47:42 AM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation issue (no audio format found to offer) From looking into this, it appears as if this is due

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation issue (no audio format found to offer)

2011-08-04 Thread Ryan McGuire
, David Vossel dvos...@digium.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Ryan McGuire rdmcguir...@gmail.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2011 9:47:42 AM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation issue (no audio format found to offer) From looking

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation issue (no audio format found to offer)

2011-08-04 Thread Ryan McGuire
, August 3, 2011 9:47:42 AM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation issue (no audio format found to offer) From looking into this, it appears as if this is due to Asterisk negotiating the legs separately as if they were not related to the same call. So the ingress leg negotiates

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation issue (no audio format found to offer)

2011-08-03 Thread Ryan McGuire
From looking into this, it appears as if this is due to Asterisk negotiating the legs separately as if they were not related to the same call. So the ingress leg negotiates ulaw, and despite it knowing that the peer also supports g729 fails the call since it's already decided on ulaw and the

[asterisk-users] Codec negotiation issue (no audio format found to offer)

2011-08-02 Thread Ryan McGuire
Running build 1.8.5.0 (compiled from source) I seem to be having an issue with codec negotiation. I have a Grandstream HT503 FXO port connected to a pstn line, a Polycom SP501, and a SIP trunk with callwithus. What I'm essentially looking to accomplish is for ulaw or g729 (preferably ulaw) to be

[asterisk-users] Codec negotiation

2011-02-07 Thread Ondrej Valousek
Hi List, I am using asterisk 1.8.1. and I want to avoid transcoding when 2 SIP peers calling each other: A (g722, alaw) calls B (alaw,ulaw) via asterisk. My setup: allow=g722,alaw preferred_codec_only=no Note that when B calls A, codec alaw is used on both ends, fine, but it does not seem

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation

2011-02-07 Thread faisal
Hi, If you will send call without answering on asterisk and have directrtpsetup=yes in sip.conf codec negociation will always be between UAs so any matched codec will work fine. If you are answering call on asterisk then dialing it out to next UA then you need to add canreinvite=yes for both

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation : expecting G726, getting G711a (alaw)

2010-08-05 Thread Jonas Kellens
On 08/03/2010 04:21 PM, Philipp von Klitzing wrote: Also: There are at least two implementations of the g726 codec, i.e. g726 and g726aal2. For this also look at the g726nonstandard setting in sip.conf. It is quite possible that your problem is here. I have the following setting in

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation : expecting G726, getting G711a (alaw)

2010-08-05 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Only when I configure my Grandstream to use only G726 (I have 8 choices), I see that the g726-codec is used. When I configure 7 x g726 and 1 x alaw, then again alaw is used ! Is it normal that Asterisk has such a great preference for alaw ?! The moment the peer suggests codec alaw (even if

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation : expecting G726, getting G711a (alaw)

2010-08-03 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! Question 1 : [Aug 2 13:56:57] Capabilities: us - 0x90a (gsm|alaw|g726|g729), peer - audio=0x808 (alaw|g726)/video=0x0 (nothing), combined - 0x808 (alaw|g726) why is combined alaw|g726 and not g726|alaw (reverse) ?? Guess: Here the order presented has no meaning for the order of codec

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation : expecting G726, getting G711a (alaw)

2010-08-03 Thread Jonas Kellens
Hello Philipp, thank you for your answer. On 08/03/2010 01:21 PM, Philipp von Klitzing wrote: Question 3 : How can I get g726 as first preferred codec ?? Which Asterisk version are you using? Using Asterisk 1.4.30 * check if you have disallow/allow settings in the [general]

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation : expecting G726, getting G711a (alaw)

2010-08-03 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Also: There are at least two implementations of the g726 codec, i.e. g726 and g726aal2. For this also look at the g726nonstandard setting in sip.conf. It is quite possible that your problem is here. For quick testing to see if the codec works at all: Configure your phones to do g726 only (so

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation : expecting G726, getting G711a (alaw)

2010-08-03 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! In the [general] section of sip.conf I have : disallow=all allow=g726 allow=alaw allow=g729 allow=gsm So change the order there and see what happens. * look at the variable SIP_CODEC for the inbound (first) call leg, and in Asterisk 1.8 (or 1.6.2?) also at SIP_CODEC_OUTBOUND

[asterisk-users] Codec negotiation : expecting G726, getting G711a (alaw)

2010-08-02 Thread Jonas Kellens
Hello list, Grandstream GXP2010 phone calling to Snom 320, Asterisk in the middle. Grandstream allows for 8 different codec specifications. I have defined them as 4 x G726 4 x alaw. Snom allow for 7 different codec specifications. I have defined them as 3 x G726 4 x G729. The SIP peers

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation

2010-06-29 Thread Steve Davies
On 26 June 2010 22:08, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com wrote: I have Polycom phones that support the g722 codec. Adding allow=g722 to the [general] section of sip.conf works great and I can make calls between the phones using g722. However Asterisk is negotiating g722 for calls going out my

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation

2010-06-29 Thread Mindaugas Kezys
...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Davies Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 7:51 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation On 26 June 2010 22:08, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com wrote: I have Polycom phones that support the g722 codec

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation

2010-06-29 Thread mike mosier
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation On 26 June 2010 22:08, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com wrote: I have Polycom phones that support the g722 codec. Adding allow=g722 to the [general] section of sip.conf works great and I can make calls

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation

2010-06-29 Thread Jonas Kellens
Does the 1.4.26.2-patch also work with asterisk 1.4.30 ?? I have reported a codec-issue, but there is no solution. Will this patch also answer my question ?? https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17020 Jonas. On 06/29/2010 09:42 PM, Mindaugas Kezys wrote: Try this:

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation

2010-06-29 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! Because the codec is already chosen before the call is made, and you told it that g722 is permitted. There are all sorts of discussions in play about codec negotiation, but at this point in time, if you want different behaviour you'll need to go and code it yourself Look at the list

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation

2010-06-29 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! Does the 1.4.26.2-patch also work with asterisk 1.4.30 ?? Most probably - who on this list would you like to test it for you? ;- Philipp -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation

2010-06-29 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Philipp von Klitzing klitz...@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de wrote: Hi! Because the codec is already chosen before the call is made, and you told it that g722 is permitted. There are all sorts of discussions in play about codec negotiation, but at this point

[asterisk-users] Codec negotiation

2010-06-26 Thread Ryan Wagoner
I have Polycom phones that support the g722 codec. Adding allow=g722 to the [general] section of sip.conf works great and I can make calls between the phones using g722. However Asterisk is negotiating g722 for calls going out my voip provider and transcoding these to ulaw. In sip.conf for the

[asterisk-users] Codec negotiation for Thomson ST2030 and g729

2008-07-07 Thread Vinz486
Hi all, i'm trouble with codec setup on an asterisk machine 1.4.18 and some Thomson ST2030 as extensions. In the users.conf file for internal extension i have: disallow=all allow=g729 allow=alaw allow=ulaw Without any codec installed (i mean with original g729 of asterisk) all go fine, calling

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation for Thomson ST2030 and g729

2008-07-07 Thread Olivier
If my memory serves me right, we could use Thomson ST2030 and Asterisk 1.4. Have you tried with another soft or hardphone ? 2008/7/7 Vinz486 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, i'm trouble with codec setup on an asterisk machine 1.4.18 and some Thomson ST2030 as extensions. In the users.conf file

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec negotiation for Thomson ST2030 and g729

2008-07-07 Thread Vinz486
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If my memory serves me right, we could use Thomson ST2030 and Asterisk 1.4. Have you tried with another soft or hardphone ? Why not??? ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2007-07-16 Thread O . Kamal
I do not need g723.1 codec, this is not the problem, here is another description of the problem: The client offer 2 codecs (g729 and g723) for all calls, my server accept only g729, so normally the client server will negotiate the codec and both sides agrees on g729, but this does not happened

[asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2007-07-12 Thread O . Kamal
I am having a problem with my asterisk gateway, it is accepting only G729, the client is offering G729 and G723.1, however for some reasons, around 15% of calls are rejected due to failed codec negotiation giving an codec error No compatible codecs, not accepting this offer. Anyone gone through

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2007-07-12 Thread Al Bochter
So who do you pay to use the G723 codec? Best regards, Al Bochter http://www.BochterServices.com --- See what we are selling at auction http://www.epier.com/auctions.asp?bochterservices

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2007-07-12 Thread ram
On 7/12/07, O. Kamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am having a problem with my asterisk gateway, it is accepting only G729, the client is offering G729 and G723.1, however for some reasons, around 15% of calls are rejected due to failed codec negotiation giving an codec error No compatible codecs,

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2007-07-12 Thread Jared Smith
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 14:39 -0400, Al Bochter wrote: So who do you pay to use the G723 codec? It's possible to use the G.723.1 codec with Asterisk by buying a Digium TC400B transcoder card[1]. Without that card, the best Asterisk can do is to pass through the packets, but it can't doing any

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-31 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
- Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I expected Asterisk to send G711 instead, as that's what is set in [general] in sip.conf And as you've already learned, Asterisk will reorder the codecs in the outbound INVITE so that the codec used on the incoming channel is listed as first

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-23 Thread Nick Hoffman
On Fri July 21 2006 18:33, Woodoo People .pGa! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: don't forget the following: if canreinvite=yes, asterisk will NOT stay in mediapath, so, it going to ask both parties to negotiate codec, and say hello to the stream. (if both parties supports g729, and can negotiate it,

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-21 Thread Woodoo People .pGa!
I have two polycom phones. One on a slow link, and one on a fast one. I'm trying to set the phone on the slow link to use G729 as it's first preference, and the phone on the fast link to use G711 as it's first preference. sip.conf has: [general] allow=ulaw allow=g729 [slow-link] ;

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-21 Thread Woodoo People .pGa!
No, we aren't intending to check for available g729 codecs that's why we wanted to have ulaw as a backup when no g729 codecs where available. That won't work. If it's trying to use G729, it will still try even when the licenses are all in use. So you need to either force it g729

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-21 Thread Marco Mouta
Just an idea: Put this Slow-Phone sip account into sip realtime database, and outside of asterisk manage to verify G729 licenses availability and script it to your SIP-realtime. This way every call to this SIP account will go to SIP realtime database that is being changed by an external script

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-21 Thread Martin Joseph
On Jul 21, 2006, at 3:01 AM, Woodoo People .pGa! wrote: No, we aren't intending to check for available g729 codecs that's why we wanted to have ulaw as a backup when no g729 codecs where available. That won't work. If it's trying to use G729, it will still try even when the licenses are

RE: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 4:14 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation Just an idea: Put this Slow-Phone sip account into sip realtime database, and outside of asterisk manage to verify G729 licenses availability

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-21 Thread Brian Capouch
Douglas Garstang wrote: Can't put it in a realtime database. We have multiple Asterisk boxes in a cluster, and it's a well known fact that multiple Asterisk boxes using realime cannot query a common MySQL database. Sounds crazy, but true. You spread some amazing well-known facts on this

RE: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Brian Capouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 11:33 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation Douglas Garstang wrote: Can't put it in a realtime database. We have

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-21 Thread Brian Capouch
Douglas Garstang wrote: Would you like me to dig up the posts from Keving Fleming stating that this is known not to work Brian? As I recall those posts have to do with the way your particular setup required ARA to work with a failover/redundant cluster system you were building. Beyond

RE: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Brian Capouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 12:08 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation Douglas Garstang wrote: Would you like me to dig up

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-21 Thread olivier.taylor
I must agree, we use 2 Ser in front of 4 asterisk sharing the same database cluster. Olivier Brian Capouch a écrit : Douglas Garstang wrote: Would you like me to dig up the posts from Keving Fleming stating that this is known not to work Brian? As I recall those posts have to do with

RE: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
Well, I wish someone would tell Kevin Fleming that. -Original Message- From: olivier.taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 1:04 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation I must agree

RE: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-21 Thread Joshua Colp
- Original Message - From: Douglas Garstang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:21:15 -0300 Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation Well, I wish someone would

RE: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Joshua Colp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 9:38 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation - Original Message - From: Douglas Garstang [mailto:[EMAIL

[asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-20 Thread Douglas Garstang
I'm a little confused about Asterisk codec negotiation. Hopefully someone can help. I have two phones, one on a slow link where I'd like to use G729, and one on a fast link where I'd like to use ulaw. My sip.conf has: [general] allow=ulawallow=g729 ... [slow-phone] allow=g729 allow=ulaw

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-20 Thread Martin Joseph
On Jul 20, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote: I'm a little confused about Asterisk codec negotiation. Hopefully someone can help.   I have two phones, one on a slow link where I'd like to use G729, and one on a fast link where I'd like to use ulaw.   My sip.conf has:   [general]

RE: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-20 Thread Douglas Garstang
DiscussionSubject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation On Jul 20, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote: I'm a little confused about Asterisk codec negotiation. Hopefully someone can help. I have two phones, one on a slow link where I'd like to use G729

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-20 Thread Martin Joseph
On Jul 20, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote:Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec NegotiationOn Jul 20, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote:I'm a little confused about Asterisk codec negotiation. Hopefully someone can help. I have two phones, one on a slow link where I'd like to use

RE: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-20 Thread Douglas Garstang
Message-From: Martin Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:34 PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation On Jul 20, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote: Subject: Re

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-20 Thread Martin Joseph
, 2006 12:34 PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec NegotiationOn Jul 20, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote:Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec NegotiationOn Jul 20, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Douglas

[asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-17 Thread Douglas Garstang
I have two polycom phones. One on a slow link, and one on a fast one. I'm trying to set the phone on the slow link to use G729 as it's first preference, and the phone on the fast link to use G711 as it's first preference. sip.conf has: [general] allow=ulaw allow=g729 [slow-link] ; Override

Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-17 Thread Martin Joseph
On Jul 17, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote: I have two polycom phones. One on a slow link, and one on a fast one. I'm trying to set the phone on the slow link to use G729 as it's first preference, and the phone on the fast link to use G711 as it's first preference. sip.conf has:

RE: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation

2006-07-17 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Martin Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:40 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Codec Negotiation On Jul 17, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote: I have two

[Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2006-06-22 Thread Thomas Kenyon
If I have an incoming call which uses G.711u, which then gets transferred to a phone which has G.729 selected as its first preference (with 711 as a third). Is it normal behaviour for asterisk to transcode the call to G.729 rather than keep it as 711? Does anyone know if when T.38 support is

[Asterisk-Users] codec negotiation

2006-04-17 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
We have four settings for the codec. How will it be negotiated? How should it be negotiated in relation to the available bandwidth? Is there an influence by using canreinvite=yes ? Phone A has a setting for the priority of codec Sip.conf has (maybe even different) settings for the priority of

[Asterisk-Users] codec negotiation with SPA-3K

2006-02-17 Thread Steve Kennedy
I'm having trouble with Asterisk-1.2.4 negotiating codecs with a Sipura 3000 which is running the latest v3 firmware. The SPA-3K seems to use the preferred codec only and doesn't negotiate? The SPA is set to no in use only preferred codec. Does anyone know if Sipura will support gsm at some

[Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2006-02-09 Thread Ronald Voermans
Hi All, I've set up an Asterisk box with a SIP trunk to our PSTN provider. I've configured two incoming phonenumbers. One phonenumber is for voice-calls, the other one for receiving faxes. I want the incoming voice-calls to be coded by the G.729 codec, and the fax-number by G.711. Can I

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2006-02-09 Thread Florian Overkamp
Hi, Ronald Voermans wrote: I've set up an Asterisk box with a SIP trunk to our PSTN provider. I've configured two incoming phonenumbers. One phonenumber is for voice-calls, the other one for receiving faxes. I want the incoming voice-calls to be coded by the G.729 codec, and the fax-number by

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2006-02-09 Thread Ronald Voermans
--- -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Florian Overkamp Verzonden: donderdag 9 februari 2006 18:27 Aan: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Onderwerp: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation Hi, Ronald Voermans wrote

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2006-02-09 Thread Florian Overkamp
Hi Ronald, Ronald Voermans wrote: What exactly do you mean by seperating traffic in to differt SIP peers? The situation is as follows: I have OpenSer connected to our SIP provider/PSTN Provider (the answer to your question: Enertel). Ah 'kay. Asterisk registers to OpenSer, which then

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2006-02-09 Thread Ronald Voermans
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Florian Overkamp Verzonden: donderdag 9 februari 2006 23:38 Aan: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Onderwerp: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation Hi Ronald, Ronald Voermans wrote: What exactly do you mean by seperating traffic in to differt SIP

[Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation (not the same old stuff)

2005-11-23 Thread Dan Austin
Title: Codec negotiation (not the same old stuff) I have a H.323 device, let's call it stupid, that supports all variants of G.729. That should be good, but no. When it negotiates a call between Asterisk and a phone that supports all varients of G.729, it gets it wrong. Asterisk sends

[Asterisk-Users] codec negotiation with CISCO 7960 and Firefly softphone

2005-04-19 Thread raymond
Hi all, When I am making call with with my Cisco 7960 SIP phone, I found only codec g711 works. The network call is like this: CISCO AS5300 ---sip Asterisk sip--- CISCO7960 Peer User/ANR Call ID Seq (Tx/Rx) Formatcisco7960 30511694 152828207b0 00102/0 ulawciscoAS5300

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2005-03-17 Thread Rod Bacon
= caller? Or is this caused by the fact that requested prefs is empty? - Original Message - From: Mark Eissler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:51 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation Can't you just create a different context for inbound and outbound calls

[Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation problems

2005-02-08 Thread Daniel Corbe
My PBX seems to have just started showing wierd codec negotiation problems. I'm not all of a sudden getting this on certain phone numbers on my system: Feb 8 22:19:19 NOTICE[1125329728]: channel.c:1683 ast_set_read_format: Unable to find a path from ULAW to G729A Feb 8 22:19:19

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2005-01-26 Thread Mark Eissler
for example) the current CVS-HEAD version doesn't -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mohammed Salim Sent: dinsdag 25 januari 2005 22:10 To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2005-01-26 Thread Dave Cotton
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 16:10 -0500, Mohammed Salim wrote: The order matters in asterisk so if you want GSM to take priority over G729, simply put that ahead of the G729... so your settings should be: Allow=all This would allow everything so the next lines would be redundant. Disallow=all

[Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2005-01-25 Thread niels
Hello On every Incoming SIP and IAX call I see the following in asterisk debug: Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 10.10.10.10, requested format = gsm, requested prefs = (), actual format = g729, my prefs = (g729|gsm|g723|g726|ulaw|alaw) priority = mine The problem is that the codec

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2005-01-25 Thread Mark Eissler
The codec is selected by asterisk depending upon the codecs that you have allowed for the particular channel context and your setting of the bandwidth= parameter. It would be nice if you could set things up so that an inbound call could force * to a higher bandwidth codec when needed (for

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2005-01-25 Thread Mohammed Salim
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Eissler Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 2:22 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation The codec is selected by asterisk depending upon the codecs that you

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2005-01-25 Thread niels
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Eissler Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 2:22 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation The codec is selected by asterisk depending upon the codecs

[Asterisk-Users] Codec Negotiation Problem

2004-12-16 Thread Carlos Medina
Hi there, i had installed on all my servers the codec_g729b which is the old voiceage, so a month ago i updated the codec to codec_g729a. After that i started to get this message on my asterisk console: Dec 16 09:19:26 NOTICE[1288699200]: rtp.c:293 process_rfc3389: Don't know how to handle

Re[2]: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2004-11-21 Thread Tamas J
Saturday, November 20, 2004, 7:03:53 PM, Steven wrote: SC On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 18:48 +0100, Tamas J wrote: Hello! I would like to know wether it is possible to have end-to-end codec negotiation in iax2? What I mean is... In case the user dials a number available through PSTN, let's force

[Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2004-11-20 Thread Tamas J
Hello! I would like to know wether it is possible to have end-to-end codec negotiation in iax2? What I mean is... In case the user dials a number available through PSTN, let's force to use alaw (the client is in LAN) to overcome unneeded transcoding: iaxphone-1st asterisk - PSTN In case the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2004-11-20 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 18:48 +0100, Tamas J wrote: Hello! I would like to know wether it is possible to have end-to-end codec negotiation in iax2? What I mean is... In case the user dials a number available through PSTN, let's force to use alaw (the client is in LAN) to overcome unneeded

[Asterisk-Users] Codec negotiation

2004-02-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems that older version of asterisk does the codec negotiation fine. I have one machine running CVS-12/19/03 and this can negotiate codec g729 and gsm fine. The newer version cvs-1/27/04 does not negotiate codec correctly. The ougoing connection can only go either g729 or gsm. -- David

[Asterisk-Users] codec negotiation prob solved?

2004-02-19 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
FYI - bug 1043 has been fixed on Feb 18: From my log, below, you will see that ast_rtp_bridge is not comparing the codecs properly. Asterisk is currently comparing the integers, and not the bits of the codec. In the below example codec0 = 260. That means Codec0 allows both 256 (g729) and 4

Re: [Asterisk-Users] codec negotiation

2004-02-18 Thread Michael Graves
Why do you need 729? I just called your IAXTel number using GSM and connected fine. Michael On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:29:48 +0100, dkwok wrote: I have outgoing connection to iaxtel and another iax server A. iax server A only accept g729 codec while iaxtel is something I am not quite sure of. At

[Asterisk-Users] codec negotiation

2004-02-17 Thread dkwok
I have outgoing connection to iaxtel and another iax server A. iax server A only accept g729 codec while iaxtel is something I am not quite sure of. At the moment iaxtel only accepts gsm. I remember previously it does accept g729. my problem due to the switching between codec when making

[Asterisk-Users] Codec Negotiation Does not seem to work as expected ?? Help Please !!

2004-01-05 Thread SamW
Hello, I have been trying to get my coders to work without a conversion. I have read all the available asterisk documentation and support groups without any luck. Here is my issue. (Please feel free to ask questions if you do not understand what I am talking about.) I am using Cisco ATA-186

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Codec Negotiation Does not seem to work as expected ?? Help Please !!

2004-01-05 Thread Steven Critchfield
I think your problem comes from a misunderstanding of how the calls are placed. With your canreinvite=no in the ATA section, you end up with the ATA negotiating with asterisk for a call leg. Then you have asterisk negotiating for the other call leg. Since the RTP stream is going through asterisk,

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Codec Negotiation Does not seem to work as expected ?? Help Please !!

2004-01-05 Thread SW
Try using canreinvite=yes in all three contexts. Would that screw-up ATA, I do not know, cause I have no Cisco's ? SW Message: 5 Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 02:29:49 -0500 From: SamW [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Codec Negotiation Does not seem to work as expected

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Codec Negotiation Does not seem to work as expected ?? Help Please !!

2004-01-05 Thread Samath
Thanks for all who is helping. I tried, canreinvite=yes on all contexts but that do not seem to work as well. But the issue is not related to negotiating between end points, but for me, asterisk do not have a proper configuration scheme which works, to the requirement of the user. The

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Codec Negotiation Does not seem to work as e xpected ?? Help Please !!

2004-01-05 Thread SamW
Title: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Codec Negotiation Does not seem to work as expected ?? Help Please !! Steve, My Problem is not a problem, with the codec negotiation between end points. But when asterisk does it with canreinvite=no, * do not do it right. I replied with a lengthy discussion about

Re: [Asterisk-Users] codec negotiation

2003-12-21 Thread Nguyen Hoang Lan
Hello Eduardo, Wednesday, December 17, 2003, 1:08:00 AM, you wrote: EG Hi list, EG I'm with a little problem on codec negotiation between a cisco827 and EG asterisk. EG My sip.conf is like that: EG [general] EG port = 5060 EG bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 EG context = default EG

[Asterisk-Users] codec negotiation

2003-12-16 Thread Eduardo Goncalves
Hi list, I'm with a little problem on codec negotiation between a cisco827 and asterisk. My sip.conf is like that: [general] port = 5060 bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 context = default amaflags = default allow=g729 allow=gsm allow=alaw allow=ulaw ;disallow=all and cisco like that:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] codec negotiation

2003-12-16 Thread Andrew Thompson
- Original Message - From: Eduardo Goncalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 1:08 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] codec negotiation Hi list, I'm with a little problem on codec negotiation between a cisco827 and asterisk. My sip.conf is like