Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom echo problem

At 15:43 6/30/2007, Jordan Novak wrote: >Content-class: urn:content-classes:message >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="_=_NextPart_001_01C7BB57.4F8EC993" > > >I have three polycom 501 that are all hearing echo. The other party >sounds fine but you can hear yourself rathe

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom multiple registrations

> The 430's have two line appearances. I'm trying to get the second line > registered to a different extension but for some reason it's not > allowing me to do this. The first line will register fine but the second > line never seems to register no matter how I swap the device ID's and > permission

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom multiple registrations

Noah Miller wrote: >> The 430's have two line appearances. I'm trying to get the second line >> registered to a different extension but for some reason it's not >> allowing me to do this. The first line will register fine but the second >> line never seems to register no matter how I swap the devic

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and NAT

17:51 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom and NAT Hi All, I have a Polycom 501 that is behind a NAT. When it registers to the Asterisk server it is using the IP address on the private network and not the public IP of the NAT address

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and NAT

I have both of those command lines for my natted sip device. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darryl Dunkin Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2007 1:24 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and NAT In

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and NAT

lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Klaverstyn, David C Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 05:33 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and NAT I have both of those command lines for my natted sip device. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom firmware download

On 8/25/07, Al lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to use Polycom 330 and apparently it needs latest firmware (SIP > 2.2.0). > I dont have access to polycom site to download and was wondering if any of > you guys have it. > Thank you! > Best idea is to ask your reseller. I am not a

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom firmware download

Thats just sad, I got SIP 2.2 from trixbox now, but still we need to have some sort of place at least for ourselves to download this stuff. Looking for boot loader now. On 8/25/07, Andrew Joakimsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/25/07, Al lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm tryin

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom firmware download

Andrew Joakimsen wrote: > On 8/25/07, Al lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm trying to use Polycom 330 and apparently it needs latest firmware (SIP >> 2.2.0). >> I dont have access to polycom site to download and was wondering if any of >> you guys have it. >> Thank you! >> >>

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom firmware download

At 13:29 8/25/2007, Al lists wrote: >Thats just sad, >I got SIP 2.2 from trixbox now, but still we need to have some sort >of place at least for ourselves to download this stuff. >Looking for boot loader now. Which version?

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom firmware download

Hi: Doug wrote: > At 13:29 8/25/2007, Al lists wrote: >> Thats just sad, >> I got SIP 2.2 from trixbox now, but still we need to have some sort >> of place at least for ourselves to download this stuff. >> Looking for boot loader now. > > Which version? > >

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom firmware download

t: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom firmware download Hi: Doug wrote: > At 13:29 8/25/2007, Al lists wrote: >> Thats just sad, >> I got SIP 2.2 from trixbox now, but still we need to have some sort >> of place at least for ourselves to download this stuff. >> Looking for boo

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom firmware download

Stephen > Bosch > Sent: Monday, 27 August 2007 4:21 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom firmware download > > Hi: > > Doug wrote: > > At 13:29 8/25/2007, Al lists wrote: > >> Thats just sad

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom low volume

Probably has nothing to do with Asterisk. You can set the volume and persistence in the phones config files. Michael On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:43:45 -0800 (PST), hin lee wrote: >Using a Polycom 550 and 650 phones on my Asterisk server for testing. I can't >figure out why the volume is so low. Ho

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom low volume

Actually, it could be within Asterisk, but only if you have Zaptel hardware. If you are only using SIP devices, then the problem is with the phone configuration. You really don't provide enough information to determine what is causing your problem. How are you provisioning the phones? What

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom low volume

, Darrick Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Darrick Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom low volume > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > > Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 1:44 PM > Ac

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom low volume

ones. Hope I >provided enough information. Why don't you post a link to your sip.cfg? Typical PhoneXX.cfg? > >Thanks! >Hin > > >--- On Sat, 11/15/08, Darrick Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> From: Darrick Hartman <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom low volume

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: hin lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom low volume > To: "Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Asterisk Users" > > Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 10:40 PM > Attached, my configuration f

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom low volume

ile >http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dggrkn86_4csdzthf9&hl=en > >Server cfg file >http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dggrkn86_6gp7hr9fg&hl=en > >SIP cfg file >http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dggrkn86_3djzb86d7&hl=en > > > >--- On Sat, 11/15/08, hin lee <[EMAIL PR

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom low volume

Anybody know why the volume on calls are so low? How can I increase the volume? --- On Sat, 11/15/08, hin lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: hin lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom low volume > To: "Asterisk Users" > Date: Sat

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom low volume

At 15:26 11/17/2008, hin lee wrote: >Anybody know why the volume on calls are so low? How can I increase >the volume? > > >--- On Sat, 11/15/08, hin lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> From: hin lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [asterisk-u

Re: [asterisk-users] polycom no menu

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 7:24 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [asterisk-users] polycom no menu > > Was messing with a pol

Re: [asterisk-users] polycom no menu

Hold down 2,4,6,8 and * at the same time. This is the 501 reset key sequence. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 6:24 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Polycom 601 Contacts List

Good morning, I have a Polycom 601 with two side cars. I created a list of contacts in XML and it shows up on the side cars exaclty how I set it up in the -directory.xml file (in the order that I wanted it etc.). However when I hit the directories button and then contact directory I

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Power Specs

501 - 12V, 1A and a power/data cable 601 - 24V, 0.5A 650 - 24V, 0.5A - Dave On Jan 3, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Peder @ NetworkOblivion wrote: Does anybody happen to know the input power specs for the Polycom IP 500 and IP 600? We've mixed up our power supplies and we've got a whole box of them

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Power Specs

The 501 is 12VDC, and the 601 is 24VDC, as I recall. There was a post a few months ago that said that plugging the 24VDC into a IP501 will fry the phone. Peder @ NetworkOblivion wrote: Does anybody happen to know the input power specs for the Polycom IP 500 and IP 600? We've mixed up our pow

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Power Specs

FWIW, our Polycom IP601 phones use a transformer with output: 24VDC 500mA (center contact is positive). A Polycom reseller (or Polycom sales) could probably give you information on these other two models. Alvin Peder @ NetworkOblivion wrote: Does anybody happen to know the input power specs

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Power Specs

The IP600 is 12v!!! I fried a 600 when I used power adapter from 601. On 1/3/07, Alvin Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FWIW, our Polycom IP601 phones use a transformer with output: 24VDC 500mA (center contact is positive). A Polycom reseller (or Polycom sales) could probably give you infor

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Power Specs

Peter, I have 600's that are 12V 1.5A, + in the center. This differs from some of the other answers, maybe those differences are regional (although that would seem rather silly). HTH B Peder @ NetworkOblivion wrote: Does anybody happen to know the input power specs for the Polycom IP 500 a

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Power Specs

I haven't read trough the thread well enough. The 600 is 12V 1.5A indeed. Too bad they don't all have the same voltage. LST wrote: The IP600 is 12v!!! I fried a 600 when I used power adapter from 601. On 1/3/07, *Alvin Austin* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: FWIW,

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Power Specs

Older models, 500 and 600, are 12V, newer 601s are 24v -- Chris Mason (264) 497-5670 Fax: (264) 497-8463 Int: (305) 704-7249 Fax: (815)301-9759 UK 44.207.183.0271 Cell: 264-235-5670 Yahoo IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner,

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom registration fails

Al wrote: I'm facing a weird issue, polycom phones work fine in the main office, in remote office it says, Registration from '' failed for '70.59.21.112' - Wrong password the odd thing is Linksys phone works without any issue!! Just a guess, put nat=yes in the sip.conf for that phone and see

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom registration fails

I have never seen a registration failure solved with nat=yes. Doug Lytle wrote: Al wrote: I'm facing a weird issue, polycom phones work fine in the main office, in remote office it says, Registration from '' failed for '70.59.21.112' - Wrong password the odd thing is Linksys phone works witho

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom registration fails

Are you using tftp or ftp provisioning? If so, check your server declaration in sip.cfg in your polycom configs directory. Bryan M. Johns Partner Shelton | Johns Technology Group office: 678:248:2637 x:1500 direct: 678:229:1809 mobile: 404.259.9216 iaxtel: 700:248:2637 x:1500 http://www.shelto

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom registration fails

Eric, I did, what's happening is that the unauthorized message from the registering Polycom never reaches the Polycom because asterisk doesn't know it's natted. Therfore the Polycom never supplies the creditentials. On 1/14/07, Eric ManxPower Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have never seen

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom registration fails

Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: I have never seen a registration failure solved with nat=yes. Just a guess, put nat=yes in the sip.conf for that phone and see if it helps. Hence the, "Just a guess". Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a littl

RE: [asterisk-users] Polycom Provistioning Issue

Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom Provistioning Issue From what I know this log show everything working Perfect. Then it goes to the Welcome screen then after a long time of processing, it errors out with a 0x1 error Any Ideas? 1005195711|so |4

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Provistioning Issue

Looks like the network time server isn't provisioned. -- Bill 1005195752|app1 |4|00|Could not load time from 0.0.0.0(0.0.0.0). ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options vis

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Provistioning Issue

Fixed that issue but it does not change the error 0126204105|cfg |3|00|Image sip.ld has not changed 0126204105|copy |3|00|Download of 'sip.ld' succeeded on attempt 1 (addr 1 of 1) 0126204105|cfg |3|00|Downloaded application image is identical to current version 0126204105|cfg |3|00|Phone suc

RE: [asterisk-users] Polycom Provistioning Issue

]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Provistioning Issue Fixed that issue but it does not change the error 0126204105|cfg |3|00|Image sip.ld has not changed 0126204105|copy |3|00|Download of 'sip.ld' succeeded on attempt 1 (ad

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Provistioning Issue

.cfg file look like? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Walker Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 12:10 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom Provistioning Issue From what I know this log show

RE: [asterisk-users] Polycom Provistioning Issue

y 26, 2007 13:15 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Provistioning Issue is my mac IP Darryl Dunkin wrote: > This is typically an error in one of your config files, either > 0004f2023ecc.cfg or sip.cfg. What does your 0004f

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Provistioning Issue

Jason, Email me off-list and I will ship you a pack of usable configs. Thanks, Bryan M. Johns Partner Shelton | Johns Technology Group office: 678:248:2637 x:1500 direct: 678:229:1809 mobile: 404.259.9216 iaxtel: 700:248:2637 x:1500 http://www.sheltonjohns.com On Jan 26, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Jas

[asterisk-users] Polycom IP 501+India

Hi Friends, This is Chandra from India. I have installed and configured "Asterisk" in our company. I want to provide "Polycom IP 501" model phones to our employees. I am unable to find the dealer for these phones in India. Where can I buy these phones in India? If anybody knows, please tell me

[asterisk-users] Polycom 501 transfer feature

I can't transfer calls with my polycom 501's. Do I need to set up something in particular in the asterisk dialplan to make the feature work? ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25

[asterisk-users] Polycom BLF - multiple buddies

Hi, Can anyone please comment on what the issue may be with this. I am trying to set up an Polycom IP601 with multiple buddy icons displaying endpoint status. I am using a polycom IP601, sip 2.2.2.0084 In the phone1.cfg file I set: Using this, I get a valid SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY from the s

[asterisk-users] Polycom Spectralink 8002 Configuration

I have a new Polycom Spectralink 8002 and am having trouble with the configuration or the unit but I can't see what's wrong. The unit does not seem to even attempt to register with the Asterisk proxy but I can make calls to it. I have viewed the syslog from the device which it will actually w

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom wideband codecs?

mgra...@mstvp.com wrote: > Doing a little research before Friday's Voip Users Conference call with > Dan Behringer. > > Are any of the newer Polycom wideband codecs implemented in v1.6? > Specifically, G.722.1 or G.722.2? Asterisk 1.6 has passthrough/record/playback support for G.722.1 (Siren7) a

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom wideband codecs?

mgra...@mstvp.com wrote: > Doing a little research before Friday's Voip Users Conference call with > Dan Behringer. > > Are any of the newer Polycom wideband codecs implemented in v1.6? > Specifically, G.722.1 or G.722.2? > Which Polycom supports G.722.2? I think they are only supporting G.722,

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom wideband codecs?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote: > Which Polycom supports G.722.2? I think they are only supporting G.722, > G.722.1 and G.722.1C right now. Could someone enlighten me, what is the difference (the result part that matters, not the spec)? r

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom wideband codecs?

. Michael Graves mgraves mstvp.com o(713) 861-4005 c(713) 201-1262 sip:mjgra...@mstvp.onsip.com skype mjgraves FWD 54245 > Original Message > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom wideband codecs? > From: randulo > Date: Tue, April 21, 2009 1:40 pm > To: Asterisk Use

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Dialplan Digitmaps

Justin Phelps wrote: > I'm replacing a SoundPoint IP 600 with a SoundPoint IP 650. > > I attempted to simply reuse the existing config files for the old phone > on the new phone, but the new phone would lock up on the 4th digit when > attempted to dial out certain numbers. So, I downloaded the n

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Dialplan Digitmaps

Do the above changes look in line with common practice JohnM? -- Justin Phelps www.onitato.com 850.866.6864 Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 08:57:13 -0400 From: John Millican Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Dialplan Digitmaps To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Dialplan Digitmaps

Justin Phelps wrote: > dialplan.digit > map="[2-9]11T|[*]xxT|891xxxT|[1-7]xxxT|8[0-46-8]xxT|8500T|851xxxT|9,1[2-9]xT|9,xxxT" > > dialplan.digitmap.timeOut="3|3|3|3|3|3|3|3|3"/> > > Do the above changes look in line with common practice JohnM? Short Answer: They do. Longer answer, Y

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Productivity Suite

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Matt Darnell wrote: > 1. Set the phone to automatically record all calls to the USB stick, > now you have to press three keys. Not possible AFAIK. > 2. Put Record on the main screen when a call is active.  This would > eliminate having to press the 'more' softkey.

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Productivity Suite

From: "Matt Darnell" To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 3:04 AM Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom Productivity Suite > Has anyone been able to do the following: > > 1. Set the phone to automatically record all

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Productivity Suite

st firmware revision 3.1.x and > newer. > -Karl > > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Matt Darnell" > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 3:04 AM > Subject: [asterisk-users] Po

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Productivity Suite

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robin Rodriguez wrote: > still rather frustrating getting the EFK working. If needed I could > post that portion of sip.cfg to get you started. Please do! Just having the example could be helpful for those of us preparing to tackle this kind of pr

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Productivity Suite

On 05/21/2009 09:11 AM, Barry L. Kline wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Robin Rodriguez wrote: > >> still rather frustrating getting the EFK working. If needed I could >> post that portion of sip.cfg to get you started. > > Please do! Just having the example could be he

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Productivity Suite

> I wish Polycom would hire someone with ergonomics skills. The whole > menu system is the most painful ever designed outside entry-level > phones. Polycom is an acknowledged leader in sound quality and robust > hardware but their idea of a menu sucks rocks and always has. Most of > their menus req

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom Productivity Suite

> Yes with EFK in the latest firmwares you are able to change the on > screen button layout. I used it to bring a Do Not Disturb button to > the main screen of the SoundPoint IP330's. I may just be dense but > paired with the Administrator and Developer guides from Polycom it was > still rather fru

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom registration errors

On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Jim Gottlieb wrote: > I'm evaluating using Polycom phones for our call center and I've set > up my first phone (a SoundPoint 560) to give it a try. > > The phone is working and can successfully place and receive calls. > But every minute, there's an error in the log file: > >

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom registration errors

On 2009-06-14 at 00:19, Jeff LaCoursiere (j...@jeff.net) wrote: > > [hft0] > > type=friend > > username=hft0 > > secret=mysecret > > context=outtrunk-office > > host=192.168.200.99 > > Change the above to host=dynamic I just did this and did a 'reload'. > >reg.1.server.1.address="jtsd05" >

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom registration errors

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jim Gottlieb wrote: > On 2009-06-14 at 00:19, Jeff LaCoursiere (j...@jeff.net) wrote: > >>> [hft0] >>> type=friend >>> username=hft0 >>> secret=mysecret >>> context=outtrunk-office >>> host=192.168.200.99 >> >> Change the above to host=dynamic > > I just did this and did a 'r

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom registration errors

: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom registration errors On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jim Gottlieb wrote: > On 2009-06-14 at 00:19, Jeff LaCoursiere (j...@jeff.net) wrote: > >>> [hft0] >>> type=friend >>> username=hft

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom registration errors

On 2009-06-15 at 19:12, Jeff LaCoursiere (j...@jeff.net) wrote: > > chan_sip.c: Registration from '' failed > > for '192.168.200.99' - Username/auth name mismatch > > I am a bit confused as to the names and addresses involved here. Which > name/address is the server, and which is the phone? T

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom registration errors

Jim Gottlieb wrote: > I'm evaluating using Polycom phones for our call center and I've set > up my first phone (a SoundPoint 560) to give it a try. > > The phone is working and can successfully place and receive calls. > But every minute, there's an error in the log file: > > chan_sip.c: Reg

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom registration errors

On 2009-06-15 at 17:04, Dave Fullerton (dfullertaster...@shorelinecontainer.com) wrote: > Try changing reg.1.address to "hft0". My hunch is asterisk is looking at > the from of "6193644...@jtsd05" and going "huh? I don't know a > 6193644...@jtsd05". That makes sense and it fixed it. Thanks!

[asterisk-users] Polycom Stop Downloading Config

Does anybody know of a way to tell the Polycom phones to stop trying to download their config? We have some setup for tftp and some for ftp and if they cannot reach the server, they just keep rebooting over and over and over and never stop. I would think it should try once or twice and stop, but

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom reject button

Jason Walker wrote: > I have users in my dialplan that go from SIP to Cell > When they are at their desk and they hit reject call, it goes to the > next thing in the dialplan, thus transferring to their cell. Not what > they want. Is it possible to change the reject button to make it go to > voic

[asterisk-users] Polycom: warble on registration?

Hi, all. I just upgraded my sip.cfg for my Polycoms, and that damn warble on registration(? -- maybe it's on acquiring an IP?) has started again. I still have the old sip.cfg, but can't figure out which option it is. Any help? Thanks! -Ken D'Ambrosio -- This message has been scanned for v

Re: [asterisk-users] polycom random reboots

Yes, I recently saw this with a 501, in my case the network drop was the problem. If you have a good tester then run it on the connection. I had another drop near by and just swicthed to it. On 3/21/07, Louis-David Mitterrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, At one location we have a user whose P

Re: [asterisk-users] polycom random reboots

Did you swap the power module as well? If POE, did you swap the "patch cord"? If the power module plugs into a "power strip" did you change that? or at least the position in the strip? joe a. Louis-David Mitterrand<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote: 3/21/2007 6:40 AM: > Hi, > > At one location we have

Re: [asterisk-users] polycom random reboots

On 3/21/07, Louis-David Mitterrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, At one location we have a user whose Polycom IP430 suffers from erratic reboots. We swapped his phone for a brand new one, but the problem remains. Has anyone seen that? Our Polycom 3s and 5s ship with flaky power supplies and

Re: [asterisk-users] polycom random reboots

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 07:07:00AM -0400, joe a. wrote: > Did you swap the power module as well? If POE, did you swap the > "patch cord"? > > If the power module plugs into a "power strip" did you change that? or > at least the position in the strip? Thanks for the tought, but the IP430 has no

Re: [asterisk-users] polycom random reboots

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:07:34AM -0700, Henry Cobb wrote: > On 3/21/07, Louis-David Mitterrand > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hi, > > > >At one location we have a user whose Polycom IP430 suffers from erratic > >reboots. We swapped his phone for a brand new one, but the problem > >remains. > > >

Re: [asterisk-users] polycom random reboots

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:53:27AM -0500, Bruce Reeves wrote: > Yes, I recently saw this with a 501, in my case the network drop was > the problem. If you have a good tester then run it on the connection. > I had another drop near by and just swicthed to it. What kind of test tool would you sugges

Re: [asterisk-users] polycom random reboots

The 501 are extremely sensitive to power fluctuations and will reboot as a result of a power transient even though every other piece of equipment is fine. -- Chris Mason (264) 497-5670 Fax: (264) 497-8463 Int: (305) 704-7249 Fax: (815)301-9759 UK 44.207.183.0271 Cell: 264-235-5670 Yahoo IM: [E

Re: [asterisk-users] polycom random reboots

The one I use the most is a Fluke Net Tool. It can determine polarity problems and I believe has some diagnostics for POE and VOIP. It also can go "in-line" between a device and the network and help diagnose problems the device is experiencing that the tool would not encounter on its own. On 3/21

Re: [asterisk-users] polycom random reboots

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:53:27AM -0500, Bruce Reeves wrote: > Yes, I recently saw this with a 501, in my case the network drop was > the problem. If you have a good tester then run it on the connection. > I had another drop near by and just swicthed to it. Was that phone using POE ?

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom 601 loop

nathan, can you post your extensions.conf file [to-sip], and your sip.conf section for extension 201... ie [201]? it looks like, perhaps, it is a dialplan problem... daveC Nathan Bell wrote: I tried to add a couple of SIP phones (polycom 601s) to my existing asterisk installation. I can succes

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom 601 loop

Pertinent part of extensions.conf: ; from outside T1 [from-ptsn] exten => s,1,Answer() include => cac-ext include => sip-ext include => intertel-ext exten => t,1,Playback(vm-goodbye) exten => t,2,Hangup() ; from sip lines [from-sip] include => internal ; generic interal route [internal] exten =>

RE: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 14:30 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk I was previously having an issue with a Polycom phone and Polycom support said that Asterisk didn't play

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Matt, I am running Polycom 2.1 on both 1.4 and 1.2 svn releases without any problems. What kind of issues did you experience? On 3/28/07, Mike Hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was previously having an issue with a Polycom phone and Polycom support said that Asterisk didn't play well with

RE: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Reeves Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:07 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk Matt, I am running Polycom 2.1 on both 1.4 and 1.2 svn releases without any problems.

RE: [asterisk-users] Polycom SoundPoint 501

: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 17:18 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom SoundPoint 501 Hi We've setup an Asterisk PBX recently and I encountered the following problem: When [mac address]-registration.cfg file includes the FQDN of the Asteris

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom SoundPoint 501

stname and port (5060) defined. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paolo Supino Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 17:18 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom SoundPoint 501 Hi We've se

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom SoundPoint 501

You need to setup a DNS SRV record. On 3/28/07, Paolo Supino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi We've setup an Asterisk PBX recently and I encountered the following problem: When [mac address]-registration.cfg file includes the FQDN of the Asterisk PBX for the Polycom SoundPoint 501 phones it will

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Strange that I cant recall any other device that Asterisk was not working with. So it seems that Polycom is not in compliance with RFC2543. That and Polycom has been known to flat out refuse support if you mention the word "Asterisk" On 3/28/07, Mike Hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom SoundPoint 501

Hi Andrew I setup a SRV record to resolve this so that I can use names in the configuration (I hate hard coding IP addresses into configuration files), but the SoundPoint 430 I have don't display the same symptom. I also know about a few other installations where this symptom doesn't happe

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom SoundPoint 501

erisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom SoundPoint 501 Hi We've setup an Asterisk PBX recently and I encountered the following problem: When [mac address]-registration.cfg file includes the FQDN of the Asterisk PBX for the Polycom SoundPoint 501

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Andrew Joakimsen wrote: > Strange that I cant recall any other device that Asterisk was not > working with. So it seems that Polycom is not in compliance with > RFC2543. That and Polycom has been known to flat out refuse support if > you mention the word "Asterisk" That's not the case anymore. Dig

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Flawless as far as I know. Bruce Reeves wrote: Matt, I am running Polycom 2.1 on both 1.4 and 1.2 svn releases without any problems. What kind of issues did you experience? On 3/28/07, *Mike Hammett * <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I was previously having an iss

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

First-sale doctrine, unless your vendor did something illicit to obtain Polycom phones there is nothing they can do about it. It's good to know Polycom has anti-competitive business practices. I also dislike that they refuse to give out anything but old firmware versions too. On 3/30/07, Stephen

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Andrew Joakimsen wrote: > First-sale doctrine, unless your vendor did something illicit to > obtain Polycom phones there is nothing they can do about it. What they can do is refuse to keep supplying the vendor, and that's a threat the vendors tend to take seriously, especially if the product is an

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Well I would wonder how Polycom even had any idea whom your vendor is. On 4/2/07, Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Joakimsen wrote: > First-sale doctrine, unless your vendor did something illicit to > obtain Polycom phones there is nothing they can do about it. What they can do i

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Serial number? Andrew Joakimsen wrote: Well I would wonder how Polycom even had any idea whom your vendor is. On 4/2/07, Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Joakimsen wrote: > First-sale doctrine, unless your vendor did something illicit to > obtain Polycom phones there is nothing

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

> It's good > to know Polycom has anti-competitive business practices. I also > dislike that they refuse to give out anything but old firmware > versions too. They could do a lot to improve their relationships with their public :( I second that! I like the 501 and 601 phones I have, and they c

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Andrew Joakimsen wrote: > Well I would wonder how Polycom even had any idea whom your vendor is. The vendor made a request for 2.1.0 on my behalf and let it slip that it was for one of my clients :) What is it about current firmware that makes them so paranoid? For pete's sake! If the argument is

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom and Asterisk

Maybe the firmware uses GPL'd code? ;-) Just a theory, don't sue me Polycom! On 4/5/07, Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Joakimsen wrote: > Well I would wonder how Polycom even had any idea whom your vendor is. The vendor made a request for 2.1.0 on my behalf and let it slip th

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >