Quoting Mark Coccimiglio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mark,
Do these 1600 series Cisco routers you mention that you find on eBay
for $50-$150 support Layer3 routing? I have a managed switch setup
on my home network with several VLANs defined. (work subnet, home
subnet, VOIP subnet) I currently
Mark,
Do these 1600 series Cisco routers you mention that you find on eBay
for $50-$150 support Layer3 routing? I have a managed switch setup on
my home network with several VLANs defined. (work subnet, home subnet,
VOIP subnet) I currently have to use a Linux box to route between
the VL
I'd wager to say yes, it does support layer 3 routing :) That's a bit of a
redundant term (though you can route above layer 3). Depending on how many
interfaces you have on your router, you may be sending multiple vlans over a
trunk port (I'm pretty sure the 1600 series support trunk ports -- you
Mark Coccimiglio wrote:
Marty,
Where are you paying $1000 for a 1600 series Cisco? I can get you
20% off that price on any quantity (note: Sarcasam). Its not the
1990's anymore. You can get them on eBay ($50-150) for only slightly
more then the Linksys. The performance is rock solid. T
On 2007-01-07 01:23:22 -0800, Mark Coccimiglio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Marty,
Where are you paying $1000 for a 1600 series Cisco? I can get you
20% off that price on any quantity (note: Sarcasam). Its not the
1990's anymore. You can get them on eBay ($50-150) for only slightly
more t
Marty,
Where are you paying $1000 for a 1600 series Cisco? I can get you
20% off that price on any quantity (note: Sarcasam). Its not the 1990's
anymore. You can get them on eBay ($50-150) for only slightly more then
the Linksys. The performance is rock solid. Three-quarters of the
wor
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 05:37:22PM -0500, Allen Casteran wrote:
> Mike wrote:
> >You're quite right, I typed before thinking. Upload is the problem
> >anyways, since it usually (in homes) uses much more limited bandwidth
> >than downloading does.
> >
> >No answer to my question though: How do y
I use pfSense, which is based upon m0n0wall. It provides a lot more features
than a stock m0n0wall, and I haven't had any problems with it. The RRD
graphs it provides are really great informational tools, and there's a built
in QoS wizard that even has "Asterisk" as a built-in option to prioritize
As I posted yesterday,
Use m0n0wall from m0n0.ch on an old pc or a little router box for the best
results.
I use draytek 2910 routers and they work fine.
On 6/1/07 19:00, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re: Best inexpensive home office router for
> VoIP (QoS with maybe PoE)
On 2007-01-06 00:48:11 -0800, Mark Coccimiglio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Mike
I'm using a Cisco 1605R [running IOS 12.3(5a)] small office router with
"Fair-Weight" queueing enabled. Works great. The nice thing about
Fair-Weight queueing is that it dynamically adapts to lower the
priority of
On 2007-01-04 09:56:58 -0800, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Hi,
I'm looking for opinions on the "best value" router to use for home offices.
It should work for a scenario in which there are 3 computers and 2 SIP
phones, handling QoS so that the p
Mike wrote:
You're quite right, I typed before thinking. Upload is the problem
anyways, since it usually (in homes) uses much more limited bandwidth
than downloading does.
No answer to my question though: How do you people handle QoS without
relying on the phones to do that? I'd like a box
The absolute best results I have had were with m0n0wall (m0n0.ch) which
worked perfectly for me to bounce voip calls over vpns with other traffic
and no user any the wiser. Second after that but with lots of plus points
for value come the draytek routers. A couple of years ago, their firmware
used
13 matches
Mail list logo
