[asterisk-users] queue members

2010-05-04 Thread Vieri
Hi, ZAP/DAHDI extension 3210 calls an Asterisk queue 4050 with one SIP agent 4053 added via -QueueAdd(4050, Local/4...@from-internal/n, 1) (not via agents.conf). SIP extension 4053 rings, answers and then decides to blind-transfer to ZAP/DAHDI extension 3666. The show queue command still

Re: [asterisk-users] queue members randomly become paused after upgrade to Asterisk 1.4

2008-10-06 Thread Giorgio Incantalupo
Hi Mark, made some other tests but the problem remains. I installed 1.4.22-rc5 but nothing changed. I opened an issue on mantis waiting for a fix. Giorgio ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 -

Re: [asterisk-users] queue members randomly become paused after upgrade to Asterisk 1.4

2008-08-14 Thread Giorgio Incantalupo
Hi Mark, it seems that upgrading to Asterisk 1.4.21.2 magically solved the problem. :-) Giorgio Incantalupo Mark Michelson wrote: Giorgio Incantalupo wrote: Hi Mark, I assure my queues.conf is full of autopause = no, in the singles and general contexts (I'm not sure where to put it

Re: [asterisk-users] queue members randomly become paused after upgrade to Asterisk 1.4

2008-07-23 Thread Giorgio Incantalupo
Hi Mark, I assure my queues.conf is full of autopause = no, in the singles and general contexts (I'm not sure where to put it 'cause I found no docs about it). Moreover, this morning I checked my Asterisk with show queues and I found another surprise: SIP/17 with penalty 1 (paused) (Not

Re: [asterisk-users] queue members randomly become paused after upgrade to Asterisk 1.4

2008-07-23 Thread Mark Michelson
Giorgio Incantalupo wrote: Hi Mark, I assure my queues.conf is full of autopause = no, in the singles and general contexts (I'm not sure where to put it 'cause I found no docs about it). Moreover, this morning I checked my Asterisk with show queues and I found another surprise:

[asterisk-users] queue members randomly become paused after upgrade to Asterisk 1.4

2008-07-21 Thread Giorgio Incantalupo
Hi all, I have upgraded my Asterisk box from 1.2.x to 1.4.x version: it seems that sometimes some phones become paused and cannot receive calls anymore. I tried to set autopause = no in every section of my queues.conf but nothing changes Anybody knows why a phone becomes paused? Is it an

Re: [asterisk-users] queue members randomly become paused after upgrade to Asterisk 1.4

2008-07-21 Thread Mark Michelson
Giorgio Incantalupo wrote: Hi all, I have upgraded my Asterisk box from 1.2.x to 1.4.x version: it seems that sometimes some phones become paused and cannot receive calls anymore. I tried to set autopause = no in every section of my queues.conf but nothing changes Anybody knows why

Re: [asterisk-users] queue members randomly become paused after upgrade to Asterisk 1.4

2008-07-21 Thread Giorgio Incantalupo
Hi Mark, it is show queues I use to see if phones are paused or not. The phones I'm using for tests are all SIP phones. Yes, what you are supposing could be right...Asterisk could see the phones as stuck. I'm still investigating, making test on my 1.4 box and I have noticed some other strange

Re: [asterisk-users] queue members randomly become paused after upgrade to Asterisk 1.4

2008-07-21 Thread Mark Michelson
Giorgio Incantalupo wrote: Hi Mark, it is show queues I use to see if phones are paused or not. The phones I'm using for tests are all SIP phones. Yes, what you are supposing could be right...Asterisk could see the phones as stuck. I'm still investigating, making test on my 1.4 box and I

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue members, URI.

2007-12-28 Thread Chris Earle
Hi all, sorry to rehash this - but I'm having similar issues. I'm on Asterisk 1.0 and have been using Queues without any problems locally. I mean, all the SIP devices on my local server can be added to queues using AddQueueMember. However, I now need to allow agents from other servers to log in

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue members, URI.

2007-10-03 Thread Atis Lezdins
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 19:30:44 Thomas Kenyon wrote: Is there an advantage to having a Queue members URI in the form: SIP/User (or indeed IAX2/User) Over Local/number@context ? I know that the latter will allow you to do things like set counting logic etc. through dialplan

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue members, URI.

2007-10-03 Thread lenz
I believe that using the Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED] format will give you a bit more flexibility in the dialplan design, as there is an added degree of indirection. In the end I think this is only marginally costier than the raw channel format (unless you use the /n option) and should provide

[asterisk-users] Queue members, URI.

2007-10-02 Thread Thomas Kenyon
Is there an advantage to having a Queue members URI in the form: SIP/User (or indeed IAX2/User) Over Local/number@context ? I know that the latter will allow you to do things like set counting logic etc. through dialplan operations, but the former appears to be a more direct route to calling

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue members, URI.

2007-10-02 Thread Julian Lyndon-Smith
Thomas Kenyon wrote: Is there an advantage to having a Queue members URI in the form: SIP/User (or indeed IAX2/User) Over Local/number@context ? I know that the latter will allow you to do things like set counting logic etc. through dialplan operations, but the former appears to be a

[Asterisk-Users] queue members with multiple devices (bug 4759)

2005-07-26 Thread Diego Ercolani
Hello all, I've written the small patch to do what is said in the subject. kpfleming sais that the same logic can be accomplished in the dialplan but I could not find how (as I don't know how to verify if an agent is busy or not) anyone of you have an idea? Thank you