On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:34:44AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> I presume you mean 2.4 and 2.6.
>
> Six months ago the Stable release of Debian couldn't run 2.6 kernels
> without installing a few updated packages from their backports.org
> repository. There has been a release since then that incl
Brett, Gary wrote:
From what ive read on this list and the wiki, centos 4.x has issues with the
TE110P card ( a lot of people having issues after first reboot).Would 3.5 be
better (I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] uses this)
Am I right in saying that OS's with the 1.6 kernel still require a lot more
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert La
Ferla
Sent: 04 January 2006 02:16
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
Michael Stearne wrote:
> I am having trouble with FC3.
>
> After
Michael Stearne wrote:
I am having trouble with FC3.
After doing a yum update (of 1264 packages) I still cannont compile
1.2.1 from source:
make[1]: `libedit.a' is up to date.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/editline'
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-
Look like this thread will become distro war ;)
Im using FC3 - * 1.2.1,
make sure #up2date b4 compile from tar.gz source
working fine...
Latest CentOS/Debian should be choice for production.
L
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
On 1/3/06, Technical Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We do a lot of installs on Fedora (slowly becoming our favorite). Initially
> clients asked for FC because of compatibility with Red Hat, great package
> management, etc. With FC4, you get a great set of packages, and not a lot
> of add-o
ubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Brett, Gary wrote:
>My question is which OS would be preferred in
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:33:49PM -, Brett, Gary wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wish to install asterisk 1.2 (the latest tar.gz from the site not the
> CVS version) on an HP box with a TE110P (single port E1/T1)
>
> My question is which OS would be preferred in this configuration Fedora Core
> 1 or F
On 1/3/06, Bogdan Moldovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO use FC4.
>
> Also after the install of the OS and all the required packages do a 'yum
> update'.
I am using FC3 right now with 1.0.9 and I am having a problem updating
to 1.2.1. I am trying to avoid upgrading to FC4 and I'll try a yum
u
Brett, Gary wrote:
My question is which OS would be preferred in this configuration Fedora Core
1 or Fedora Core 3, and are there any install guides out there that are
recent enough for asterisk 1.2
Use Debian or Centos (Free RHEL).
___
--Bandwidth
Brett, Gary wrote:
My question is which OS would be preferred in this configuration Fedora Core
1 or Fedora Core 3, and are there any install guides out there that are
recent enough for asterisk 1.2
Try Fedora Core 4 (FC4). Works great.
___
--Bandw
IMHO use FC4.
Also after the install of the OS and all the required packages do a 'yum
update'.
Bogdan Moldovan
MODULO Consulting
"The Future Is Not What It Used To Be"
http://www.modulo.ro
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett, Gary
Sen
12 matches
Mail list logo
