We changed from Fedora to Debian and saw the following increase in
performance:
Before:
G723 GSM ULAW ALAW G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX ILBC
G723 - - - - - - - - - - -
GSM - - 6 615 6 522 -
Jim Van Meggelen schrieb:
Hmmm. I propose that we make your system the list guinea pig! If we can
get that one tweaked, there's no telling what alse we can do with
Asterisk!
I'm not really sure that I completely get the meaning of this sentence.
(Which can be because of the fact that its 06:47 AM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Antony Stone schrieb:
>> On Wednesday 15 December 2004 21:26, Michael Vogel wrote:
>>
>>> Is it a little bit too much for such a machine? What could be the
>>> bottleneck? CPU? Memory? Interrupts?
>>
>> My advice would be to whack in a load more RAM - basically, try to
Antony Stone schrieb:
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 21:26, Michael Vogel wrote:
Is it a little bit too much for such a machine? What could be the
bottleneck? CPU? Memory? Interrupts?
My advice would be to whack in a load more RAM - basically, try to get the
poor little thing so it doesn't need to
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 21:26, Michael Vogel wrote:
> Jim Van Meggelen schrieb:
> > YIKES! What kind of processor have you got there?
>
> Its a:
> - Pentium II (Deschutes) 333MHz
> - 128mb memory
>
> I'm using it as:
> - Mailserver (IMAP, SMTP)
> - Webserver (mainly for webmail)
> - Newsserv
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Michael Vogel
> Sent: December 15, 2004 10:26 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] How "expensive" are the different
> codecs?(Regarding CPU t
el Flynn schrieb:
hmm.. those numbers look a little... high... does it show the same
values when your box is idle?
My box _is_ idle at the moment ;-)
mine gives the following, when there's no
traffic going through:
demo*CLI> show translation
Translation times between formats (in milliseconds
Michael Vogel wrote:
Thanks! That helps me a lot. Am I right that this chart is calculated
depending my machine's speed:
yes, the numbers will vary depending on your system load.
###
zhad*CLI> show translation
Translation
Michael Vogel wrote:
Hi!
The encoding, decoding and recoding cost cpu time, that's sure. But does
this time differs much depending on the used codec?
Is - for example - a G729 faster than a GSM codec?
Try 'show translations' in asterisk's CLI
(GSM is much faster than G.729)
__
el Flynn schrieb:
at the CLI, type "show translation" and it will show a chart of how long
(in milliseconds) it will take to translate from one codec to another.
Thanks! That helps me a lot. Am I right that this chart is calculated
depending my machine's speed:
##
Michael Vogel wrote:
Hi!
The encoding, decoding and recoding cost cpu time, that's sure. But does
this time differs much depending on the used codec?
Is - for example - a G729 faster than a GSM codec?
at the CLI, type "show translation" and it will show a chart of how long
(in milliseconds) it w
Michael Vogel wrote:
Hi!
The encoding, decoding and recoding cost cpu time, that's sure. But
does this time differs much depending on the used codec?
Is - for example - a G729 faster than a GSM codec?
Bye!
Michael
They vary a lot. G.729 is pretty slow. iLBC and speex in the same
ballpark. G.723.
12 matches
Mail list logo
