John Fraizer wrote:
Oh, and if you like your Grandstream, don't ever handle, let alone USE a
Cisco phone. You'll be ruined for life if you do. My grandstream is
now a toy phone for my 1 y/o son. It never was much more than a toy
to begin with.
Oh, and if you like you're money, don't ever
Tony Hoyle wrote:
Eric Wieling wrote:
Why are you even looking at VoIP? Analog ports and phones are pretty
cheap. They are not pretty, but they are cheap and all the smarts are
in the PBX.
Free calls to the US, basically, since the leased line is dirt cheap to
run. ie. the purpose of the
Eric Wieling wrote:
Why are you even looking at VoIP? Analog ports and phones are pretty
cheap. They are not pretty, but they are cheap and all the smarts are
in the PBX.
Free calls to the US, basically, since the leased line is dirt cheap to
run. ie. the purpose of the exercise is to save
Hi!
Our desktop phones were done as a package deal from the building owner
(who also runs the existing PBX) for almost nothing.
Then one option is to check if you can keep the PBX and the phones, and
just put Asterisk in between this PBX and the Telco. Compensate the costs
of the Asterisk
Philipp von Klitzing wrote:
Then one option is to check if you can keep the PBX and the phones, and
just put Asterisk in between this PBX and the Telco. Compensate the costs
of the Asterisk hardware with less spending on calls due to routing
through a VoIP proivder etc and see if that makes a
I would not recommend software RAID. My experience is that, if there is
a reboot resulting from an abnormal shutdown, Linux will recover
(re-copy) the secondary drive. This process pegs the processor
(90-100%) and takes a lng time. Of course, voice quality suffers
when a processor is
Hi!
BTW: And are you sure people wouldn't like to have voicemail? You'll need
to make them want that... ;- I guess you can even argue that voicemail
increases productivity.
Since we share phones (at least the developers/non customer facing
people) voicemail wouldn't work too well
On Thursday 03 June 2004 09:30, Michael Welter wrote:
I would not recommend software RAID. My experience is that, if there is
a reboot resulting from an abnormal shutdown, Linux will recover
(re-copy) the secondary drive. This process pegs the processor
(90-100%) and takes a lng time.
BTW: And are you sure people wouldn't like to have
voicemail? You'll
need
to make them want that... ;- I guess you can even argue
that voicemail
increases productivity.
Since we share phones (at least the developers/non customer facing
people) voicemail wouldn't work too well
Philipp von Klitzing wrote:
So also everyone has a headset plus a soundcard, I assume? ;-
Well everyone has a soundcard... There's a load of headsets hanging
around the office that get used at various times.
Tony
--
All your code belongs to Santa
Tony Hoyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key ID:
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 05:27, Tony Hoyle wrote:
Eric Wieling wrote:
Why are you even looking at VoIP? Analog ports and phones are pretty
cheap. They are not pretty, but they are cheap and all the smarts are
in the PBX.
Free calls to the US, basically, since the leased line is dirt cheap
Nik Martin wrote:
Holy cow. Everyone doesn't have their own phone? What kind of tightwad are
you working for? You are wasting FAR MORE money on lost productivity to
worry about the cost of a phone. Your boss doesn't realize that, or do you
work in a sweatshop environment?
Putting a senior
On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 14:28:33 +0100, Tony Hoyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we share phones (at least the developers/non customer facing
people) voicemail wouldn't work too well because we'd get each others'
messages. The pen sticky pad method seems to be OK. If everyone had
their own
On Thursday 03 June 2004 11:42, Tony Hoyle wrote:
Yes but they're not my problem... (Losing 2.5 days a week on meetings
then holding another meeting to discuss why we're behind on all the
deadlines is either tragic or funny depending on how you look at it).
All companies seem to suffer more or
I know that way, but some person ask for me for first way to do
transfers.
srsergio
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Stephen R.
Besch
Enviado el: miércoles, 02 de junio de 2004 15:37
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [Asterisk-Users] Re
Stephen R. Besch wrote:
Not as far as I know, at least not exactly the way you have outlined it.
Try this:
1. call comes to you
2. You hold the call and call other person.
3. You say Someone wants to talk to you, OK, thanks
3a. Other person then hangs up.
3b. You flash back
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 09:44, Tony Hoyle wrote:
Ugh. So Asterisk doesn't handle transfer?
Every company phone system I've ever used has not required 3a-3d. It
looks like a real hack to do so.
It anyone working on implementing this?
As far as I can tell it's a limitation of the phone,
Tony Hoyle wrote:
Stephen R. Besch wrote:
Not as far as I know, at least not exactly the way you have outlined
it. Try this:
1. call comes to you
2. You hold the call and call other person.
3. You say Someone wants to talk to you, OK, thanks
3a. Other person then hangs up.
John Fraizer wrote:
Asterisk handles transfer just fine. It's the P-O-S Grandstreams that
don't.
Even this analogue phone that's on my desk handles this... it's not
normally a function of the phone, but of the PBX.
How do companies that use asterisk handle incoming support calls?? I'm
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de John Fraizer
Enviado el: miércoles, 02 de junio de 2004 19:29
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Transfer with Budgetone
Tony Hoyle wrote:
Stephen R. Besch wrote:
Not as far as I know, at least not exactly the way you have
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 12:52, Tony Hoyle wrote:
Even this analogue phone that's on my desk handles this... it's not
normally a function of the phone, but of the PBX.
How do companies that use asterisk handle incoming support calls?? I'm
genuinely surprised anyone can survive without this
Tony Hoyle wrote:
John Fraizer wrote:
Asterisk handles transfer just fine. It's the P-O-S Grandstreams that
don't.
Even this analogue phone that's on my desk handles this... it's not
normally a function of the phone, but of the PBX.
How do companies that use asterisk handle incoming support
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 13:03, Sergio Serrano wrote:
I have just to talk with Grandstream and they say to me that they ar
working in 3-way conferencing for BT-100 series. I hope they have FW
soon. One question more? How can I do parking call with Budgetone.
Before # works fine, but Now it
Tony Hoyle wrote:
Stephen R. Besch wrote:
Not as far as I know, at least not exactly the way you have
outlined it.
Try this:
1. call comes to you
2. You hold the call and call other person.
3. You say Someone wants to talk to you, OK, thanks
3a. Other
John Fraizer wrote:
your desk has to be able to TELL the PBX you want to transfer a call.
No it doesn't there's a universal (?) standard for this - hit recall, dial new
number. Heck it even works on PSTN lines if you pay for the right services.
So, in short: Buy a cheap phone, get cheap
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 10:21, Tony Hoyle wrote:
John Fraizer wrote:
your desk has to be able to TELL the PBX you want to transfer a call.
No it doesn't there's a universal (?) standard for this - hit recall, dial new
number. Heck it even works on PSTN lines if you pay for the right
Adam Goryachev wrote:
The smarts are in the PBX not the phone. Though the phone DOES need a
way to tell the PBX what it wants to do. The phone is just the interface
(like the keyboard on your PC), but the PBX (CPU) is what really does
the work
That was the point I started with...
Well,
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 11:40, Tony Hoyle wrote:
Adam Goryachev wrote:
Well, actually they are. Sure, for $20 you can buy an analog phone, for
$150 you can buy a grandstream, big difference. However, for a PBX class
telephone, you are looking at prices $500 per handset
No idea what
Tony Hoyle wrote:
No idea what you mean by PBX class telephone but if anyone at our
company spent $500 on a phone they'd probably be fired (unless it was
the boss).
Our desktop phones were done as a package deal from the building owner
(who also runs the existing PBX) for almost nothing.
Oh and you need a fine digium card to interface with the channel bank.
Nik
Nik Martin wrote:
Tony Hoyle wrote:
No idea what you mean by PBX class telephone but if anyone at our
company spent $500 on a phone they'd probably be fired (unless it was
the boss).
Our desktop phones were done as a
Adam Goryachev wrote:
Plus consultative transfer calls
Well yes... pbx's job though (usually, although apparently not always...).
Plus speaker phone
No allowed to use them as they disturb people working.
Plus conferencing
We have a conferencing phone which is a huge triangular thing with lots
of
Nik Martin wrote:
You really should be using analog phones with asterisk. You'll be a
hero to your boss, because the phones wont cost a pile. All you need to
Since we already have the phones, they won't cost anything :)
add is a channel bank for the analog phones, and asterisk. There is a
On Wednesday 02 June 2004 23:13, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
redundant power. Supermicro makes such a system, I think 1 proc, 512M ECC
RAM and dual 9G drives was just under USD$1200.
Oh yeah -- if you're going to do the TE405P with that supermicro system you're
gonna have to saw up the card to
Adam Goryachev wrote:
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 11:40, Tony Hoyle wrote:
Adam Goryachev wrote:
Well, actually they are. Sure, for $20 you can buy an analog phone, for
$150 you can buy a grandstream, big difference. However, for a PBX class
telephone, you are looking at prices $500 per
34 matches
Mail list logo
