On 05/25/2013 11:42 AM, luke devon wrote:
> Hi Alec,
>
> I followed that both instructions . It was not success. got the same
> issue. I'm not sure the reason is the OS. I am Using CentOS 6.4.
>
> However, following method was helped me to resolve the problem.
>
> http://www.digip.org/jansson/r
r/ && make clean && make && make install
Regards
Luke
*From:* Alec Davis
*To:* 'luke devon' ; 'Asterisk Users Mailing
List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
*Sent:* Saturday, 25 Ma
ar.gz
cd jansson-2.4/
./configure --prefix=/usr/ && make clean && make && make install
Regards
Luke
From: Alec Davis
To: 'luke devon' ; 'Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion'
Sent: Saturday
> installed it from SVN.
> When I try to execute ./configure , got the following message ,
>
>
> configure: error: *** JSON support not found (this typically
> means the libjansson development package is missing)
>
>
> After that I tried to install certain packages by,
>
>
> yum groupinst
risk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Saturday, 25 May 2013, 2:31
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk-gui-2.1.0-rc1
Hi, how did you installed it?
if it is svn, thry to install it again.
if it is through source then delete it and try through svn
Hi
>
>I have installed asterisk-gui-2.1.0-rc1 . A
Try to use firefox instead of IE. Besides, you may check if there is any
problem in the extensions.conf. My recent experiment of installing gui into
asterisk 11.x is that there is problem in some of the macro script within
extensions.conf.
I delete the sample macro scripts in extensions.conf and u
Hi, how did you installed it?
if it is svn, thry to install it again.
if it is through source then delete it and try through svn
Hi
I have installed asterisk-gui-2.1.0-rc1 . After I logged in to the GUI
, it was continuously refreshing the web browser and trying to load
the configurations.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Silver Thorne wrote:
> Hello Folks;
>
> Perhaps I am chasing my tail here.
> Before I go any further, is this compatible/supported in Asterisk 1.6x? If
> so, I would be willing to post any manager.conf or http.conf snippets
> needed.
>
> When I attempt to open the
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:19:49AM +0900, Tseveendorj wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've installed Asterisk 1.4.21.2 with Asterisk-GUI on Ubuntu 9.04 but
> Asterisk.
>
> I couldn't see asterisk-GUI web interface when I accessed to
> http://IPADDRESS:8088/asterisk/static/config/index.html.
> But after cre
bilal ghayyad schrieb:
> what about the port 8088, from where I can set it (in case I need to change
> that port to be another port)?
That would be the "bindport" parameter in /etc/asterisk/http.conf
I guess.
Philipp Kempgen
--
AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied -> http://www.am
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:28:28AM -0700, bilal ghayyad wrote:
> About the root directory: do u mean that I have to set my root
> directoty to be /var/lib/asterisk/ at the httpd server? Because by
> default the httpd server has another root directory than this, or you
> are talking about anothe
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:28:28AM -0700, bilal ghayyad wrote:
>
> Hi Danny;
>
> I found cfgbasic.html under the /var/lib/asterisk/static-http/config
> and did not find cfgadvanced.html, any advise?
cfgbasic.html is now merely a redirection to index.html .
cfgadvanced.html is now gone - the "adv
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:27:18AM -0700, bilal ghayyad wrote:
>
> Hi Danny;
>
> Really I did not understand how I can determine if the IO will be DB or
> conf files? Is it from the Asterisk manager?
Again, unless you make some pretty major changes in the way the
asterisk-gui[1] works, it will
s.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of bilal ghayyad
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 3:48 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk-gui: read/write in the conf file
I am not able to understand the relation between the AMI and the GUI? And
really I am not able to know where to determine if my Asterisk will read/write
with DB or with config files?
Regards
Bilal
---
Why not connect to the AMI via telnet?
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009
Hi Danny;
Really I did not understand how I can determine if the IO will be DB or conf
files? Is it from the Asterisk manager?
Regards
Bilal
-
It depends on how you are configured. The gui interfaces using Asterisk
Manager, so you get the Same IO from the gui that you
Why not connect to the AMI via telnet?
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:27 PM, bilal ghayyad wrote:
>
> Hi Danny;
>
> Really I did not understand how I can determine if the IO will be DB or
> conf files? Is it from the Asterisk manager?
>
> Regards
> Bilal
>
> -
>
> It depends o
It depends on how you are configured. The gui interfaces using Asterisk
Manager, so you get the Same IO from the gui that you would get from a
native manager session.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behal
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 03:35:56PM -0700, bilal ghayyad wrote:
>
> Hi All;
>
> asterisk-gui read/write from the conf files or database?
Asterisk-gui's database is the config files ;-)
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406
This would be better on the Asterisk-gui list, but it's because it's written in
users.conf
registersip=yes
-bk
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph L. Casale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 4:18:25 PM
A COMPLETE shot in the dark, but:
Tomasz Zieleniewski wrote:
> [Feb 4 09:33:09] == Parsing
> '/home/asterisk/asterisk/1.4/pbx/etc/asterisk/manager.conf': [Feb 4
> 09:33:09] Found
If this is where you've got everything installed, i.e. with a base of
/home/asterisk/asterisk/1.4/pbx/, maybe:
>
bkruse wrote:
> Is this with the latest version of the gui?
>
> (branches/asterisknow)
> (http://asteriskNOW.org/install-related)
>
> Tell me what revision, and paste the context of the user entry thats
> having a problem.
>
> -bk
>
>
> Will Tatam wrote:
>> Has anyone tested disabling call wa
On Friday 12 October 2007 10:45:52 Steve Totaro wrote:
> FaberK wrote:
> > I've just started to see that Asterisk-gui from Digium.
> > Does anybody know, when the first official-realese will be released?
>
> I may be totally wrong but at Astricon, during the "What's New at
> Digium" (SwitchVox purc
If you read between my lines, my guess is it won't be released unless
the community takes it out of Digium's hands and forks it.
Thanks,
Steve
FaberK wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> you are totally right, but my question is because a saw that gui into
> SVN and not yet released, but at the same time used
Hi Steve,
you are totally right, but my question is because a saw that gui into SVN
and not yet released, but at the same time used into AsteriskNOW.
Was just a question...
;o)
Thanks
2007/10/12, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> FaberK wrote:
> > Hi to all,
> > I've just started to see that
FaberK wrote:
> Hi to all,
> I've just started to see that Asterisk-gui from Digium.
> Does anybody know, when the first official-realese will be released?
>
> Thanks to all
>
> --
> .:FaberK:.
>
I may be totally wrong but at Astricon, during the "What's New at
Digium" (SwitchVox purchase) I
> In Paul's defense, it looked to me like his original post was simply
> a joke that was misunderstood. (I thought it was funny, anyway)
>
I have written a few jokes for this list over the years - it's nice to
know that some people find them funny.
PaulH
___
John Novack wrote:
> Dave Bour wrote:
>
>> So I'll ask the question. What's wrong with top posting.
>>
>>
> WOW! Is this a mine field, or what?
> You have stumbled into one of the hot religious arguments on just about
> all lists.
> There will NEVER be an agreement on which is acceptable.
Dave Bour wrote:
>
> So I'll ask the question. What's wrong with top posting.
>
WOW! Is this a mine field, or what?
You have stumbled into one of the hot religious arguments on just about
all lists.
There will NEVER be an agreement on which is acceptable.
Many anchored in the past hotly content
signature ]
>
> - Original Message -
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Sent: Thu Jun 21 12:48:45 2007
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk GUI
Four lines of headers (the bad headers quoting style) that actually
le
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 08:06:39AM -0400, Dave Bour wrote:
>So I'll ask the question. What's wrong with top posting. I use a
>blackberry to read most of my email, and bottom posting means excessive
>scrolling, often waiting to download additional content resulting in
>higher usage
n my usual verbose
responses)
PIN 4cc364db (as of March 24, 2007)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Thu Jun 21 12:48:45 2007
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk GUI
On Jun 20, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Troy Ayers w
On Jun 20, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Troy Ayers wrote:
> I would have been convinced if you had not top-posted! heh
>
>
> Rob Schall wrote:
>> Tom,
>>
>> I disagree with your argument for a number of reasons. Each of these
>> reasons should be more than enough to convince you I'm correct and
>> you
>>
Troy Ayers wrote:
> I would have been convinced if you had not top-posted! heh
>
>
> Rob Schall wrote:
>> Tom,
>>
>> I disagree with your argument for a number of reasons. Each of these
>> reasons should be more than enough to convince you I'm correct and
>> you should do it my way and only my
>
> For example, a user could post a message to the list asking "I'm new
> to Linux and Asterisk. Should edit my dialplan by hand, use FreePBX,
> or buy a commercial solution?" Imagine the response as you tried to
> convince them to buy PBXWare, FreePBX users try to convince them that
> the
I would have been convinced if you had not top-posted! heh
Rob Schall wrote:
> Tom,
>
> I disagree with your argument for a number of reasons. Each of these
> reasons should be more than enough to convince you I'm correct and you
> should do it my way and only my way.
>
> And for the record, V
Tom,
I disagree with your argument for a number of reasons. Each of these
reasons should be more than enough to convince you I'm correct and you
should do it my way and only my way.
And for the record, VI and CLI.
Rob
Tom Rymes wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2007, at 12:37 PM, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
>
>
On Jun 19, 2007, at 12:37 PM, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
> Tom Rymes wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> How many times does it have to be said? Don't feed the trolls!
>>
>> Tom
>>
>
> Tom...Who in your opinion is a troll?
>
>
> Senad
Well, technically, I was calling the original post a troll, not the
original
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 04:25:44AM -0700, bilal ghayyad wrote:
> Hi List;
>
> My Question was:
>
> >From where I can download the Asterisk GUI, a lot of
> replies we received but I did not receive from where I
> download it and how I compile it.
svn co http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk-gui/trun
http://www.tuxtone.com/index.php/VOIP:Asterisk_Install_Script
On 6/20/07, bilal ghayyad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi List;
>
> My Question was:
>
> From where I can download the Asterisk GUI, a lot of
> replies we received but I did not receive from where I
> download it and how I compile it.
Hi List;
My Question was:
>From where I can download the Asterisk GUI, a lot of
replies we received but I did not receive from where I
download it and how I compile it.
Regards
Bilal
Get the Yahoo! too
Tom Rymes wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2007, at 4:37 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 08:55:24PM +0100, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
>>> Brett Crapser wrote:
On Saturday 16 June 2007 02:24 am, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
> Paul Hales wrote:
>> GUI bad! CLI good!
>>
>> Paul
On Jun 16, 2007, at 4:37 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 08:55:24PM +0100, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
>> Brett Crapser wrote:
>>> On Saturday 16 June 2007 02:24 am, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
Paul Hales wrote:
> GUI bad! CLI good!
>
> PaulH
Really...?
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 17:10 -0400, Dean Collins wrote:
> Brett,
>
> The demand for asterisk GUI's could be that the world primarily consists
> of "four year olds" (as you put it - I call them customers) and not
> geeks with pocket protectors and Vi skills to tame all tasks.
>
> When you realize t
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 08:22:23AM +0100, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 08:55:24PM +0100, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
> >> Brett Crapser wrote:
> >>> On Saturday 16 June 2007 02:24 am, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
> Paul Hales wrote:
> > GUI bad! CLI goo
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 08:55:24PM +0100, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
>> Brett Crapser wrote:
>>> On Saturday 16 June 2007 02:24 am, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
Paul Hales wrote:
> GUI bad! CLI good!
>
> PaulH
Really...?
So explain why every ma
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Crapser
> Sent: Saturday, 16 June 2007 11:07 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk GUI
>
> On Saturday 16 June 2007
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 08:55:24PM +0100, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
> Brett Crapser wrote:
> > On Saturday 16 June 2007 02:24 am, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
> >> Paul Hales wrote:
> >>> GUI bad! CLI good!
> >>>
> >>> PaulH
> >>
> >> Really...?
> >>
> >> So explain why every major PBX manufacturer has
Brett Crapser wrote:
> On Saturday 16 June 2007 02:24 am, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
>> Paul Hales wrote:
>>> GUI bad! CLI good!
>>>
>>> PaulH
>>
>> Really...?
>>
>> So explain why every major PBX manufacturer has GUI of some sort?
>> Surely they would have had CLI only if GUI is "bad"!!!
>>
>>
>
On Saturday 16 June 2007 02:24 am, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
> Paul Hales wrote:
> > GUI bad! CLI good!
> >
> > PaulH
>
> Really...?
>
> So explain why every major PBX manufacturer has GUI of some sort?
> Surely they would have had CLI only if GUI is "bad"!!!
>
>
> Senad
Senad - it is really to cove
Paul Hales wrote:
> GUI bad! CLI good!
>
> PaulH
Really...?
So explain why every major PBX manufacturer has GUI of some sort?
Surely they would have had CLI only if GUI is "bad"!!!
Senad
www.bicomsystems.com
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provi
GUI bad! CLI good!
PaulH
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:40 -0700, bilal ghayyad wrote:
> Hi List;
>
> Where I can download Asterisk GUI and what I can have
> benifit from it?
>
> Regards
> Bilal
>
>
>
>
>
Voip-info has some different links to packages out there for a gui based
asterisk. In my experience, I've found it much easier to tweak a
dialplan and user accounts by hand. We are using realtime/mysql for all
our voicemail/sip/extensions, and I have a small gui I made that creates
those initial en
On 6/14/07, bilal ghayyad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi List;
Where I can download Asterisk GUI and what I can have
benifit from it?
Whaddya know - there's a whole page on the wiki dedicated to such things:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+GUI
;-)
I'm a CLI-only guy myself, so I can't
Patrick Aljord wrote:
is there a good and free asterisk gui that is not tight to a live cd?
I like [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it looks like I need to install the livecd. I
just want to run asterisk on my debian install. Is there a way to run
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on debian? or anything similar?
You can
Check out Flash Operator Panel, gives a pretty interface for watching
parked calls, agents, etc...
On 8/11/06, Rizwan Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys,
i need to know if there is any gui application out there for asterisk which
provides a live report of calls, channels, agents, confere
Well that made it sound like a much better system than I did ;-)AlexOn 8/1/06, Rajeev Natarajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:true - i was meaning to say that it has a gui 'bundled' with it... (not to mention phpmyadmin, AGI to connect to high-level
application development tools such as PHP and Perl,
true - i was meaning to say that it has a gui 'bundled' with it... (not to mention phpmyadmin, AGI to connect to high-level
application development tools such as PHP and Perl, integrated voicemail and fax-to-email support, contact
management, calling card billing and management software. autoconf
Trixbox is not a GUI, it's a package that includes the OS, Asterisk, a GUI, etc. FreePBX is the GUI included in Trixbox.AlexOn 8/1/06, Rajeev Natarajan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
try www.trixbox.orgasterisk source does not come with any GUI
On 8/1/06,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
try www.trixbox.orgasterisk source does not come with any GUIOn 8/1/06,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello friends, does anyone know if there is a gui for asterisk provided with the asterisk source or has to downloaded from somewhere else.With warm regards.Vivek J. Joshi.
[EMAIL PR
27;
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk GUI/web interfaces
> that don'tchangeconfig files
>
> As part of my overall project, I'm working on some PHP
> scripts that will do just that.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation spon
On 10/28/05, Dustin Wildes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stay tuned for PhoneCALL's 2.7-RC1 release scheduled soon. We're adding
> a new Security Manager that allows you to set the levels of editing for
> your users/admins.
>
>
> Chris Bagnall wrote:
>
> >Hello all,
> >
> >I'm trying to find an Aste
Stay tuned for PhoneCALL's 2.7-RC1 release scheduled soon. We're adding
a new Security Manager that allows you to set the levels of editing for
your users/admins.
Chris Bagnall wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to find an Asterisk web interface (or windows gui interface) to
asterisk that won't a
As part of my overall project, I'm working on some PHP scripts that will do
just that.
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
->Chris Bagnall
->Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 6:08 AM
->To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Di
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:14:39AM -0400, Ariel Batista wrote:
> Michael Felder wrote:
> >Is [EMAIL PROTECTED] as functional as full blow Asterisk.
> >I am using this for my business.
>
> Yes I feel that the actually name should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] or SOHO.
Originally it was intended to integrat
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ariel
Batista
Sent: Friday, 15 July 2005 11:04 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Gui?
Michael Felder wrote:
Can anybody recommend an Asterisk GUI to help a newbie confg ?
Try [EMAIL
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Gui?
Michael Felder wrote:
> Can anybody recommend an Asterisk GUI to help a newbie confg ?
Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] it's a complete ISO with everything you need to start
with.
If you already have the OS installed then check out AMP which is by
search for [EMAIL PROTECTED] It works well and is very easy to install for
beginners like me.
Michael Felder wrote:
Can anybody recommend an Asterisk GUI to help a newbie confg ?
Kind regards
Michael Felder
IT Medic Australia Pty. Ltd.
P: 03 9557 2213
F: 03 9557 2214
M: 0419 568 217
E: [E
This looks to be another posibility
http://www.contentmanagementsoftware.info/zope/asterisk-zTrix
Ariel Batista wrote:
Michael Felder wrote:
Can anybody recommend an Asterisk GUI to help a newbie confg ?
Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] it's a complete ISO with everything you need to start
with.
I
> Can anybody recommend an Asterisk GUI to help a newbie confg ?
If you really need a GUI that makes it simple, try [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
comes with AMP.
See http://asteriskathome.sourceforge.net/
If you only want a web-base GUI to help you edit config files, follow
instructions on this page :
http:
Michael Felder wrote:
Can anybody recommend an Asterisk GUI to help a newbie confg ?
Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] it's a complete ISO with everything you need to start
with.
If you already have the OS installed then check out AMP which is by the way
included in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kind regards
M
pinchien wrote:
> What is Asterisk GUI architecture acturally? I could not get it...
>
hmm?
check [EMAIL PROTECTED] - it contains AMP - http://asteriskathome.sf.net
Tomek
--
Startuj z INTERIA.PL! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f186
Command line as headless Linux.
W
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
pinchienSent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 12:25 PMTo:
asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk
GUI
What is Asterisk GUI architecture acturally? I could not get
it...
__
Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
Perhaps rather than a GUI we should be wanting an IDE (as in Integrated
Development Environment, not Intelligent Drive Electronics . . . bloody
overlapping acronyms . . . but I digress . . . ).
Even some basic syntax highlighting would improve the readability of
extensions.c
Colin
Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:50 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk gui?
> Just wondering how difficult it would be for AMP devs to develop a
> install wizard or a batch file that can auto
> Just wondering how difficult it would be for AMP devs to develop a
> install wizard or a batch file that can automatically execute the
> install and download necessary dependencies... until then, I guess
> I'll be continuing to manually config my asteisk files
IMO the brutal part was resol
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oliver
> Stone
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:20 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk gui?
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oliver
Stone
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:20 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk gui?
I had to give up after attempt to install AMP.. It's got very nice
- Original Message -
rom: "dean collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Oliver Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 9:39 AM
Subject: RE: [Aste
dnesday, November 24, 2004 10:20 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk gui?
I had to give up after attempt to install AMP.. It's got very nice
user interface, that is, AFTER you have sucessfully installed it.. I
see it's go
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 7:20 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk gui?
I had to give up after attempt to install AMP.. It's got very nice
user interface, that is, AFTER you have sucessfully installed it.. I
see it's
Just wondering how difficult it would be for AMP devs to develop a
install wizard or a batch file that can automatically execute the
install and download necessary dependencies... until then, I guess
I'll be continuing to manually config my asteisk files
This requirement is part of the project
I had to give up after attempt to install AMP.. It's got very nice
user interface, that is, AFTER you have sucessfully installed it.. I
see it's got great potential, but current release is very difficult to
install, even with the "newbie guide".
If you have fewer than 10 extensions to configure, i
> Perhaps rather than a GUI we should be wanting an IDE (as in Integrated
> Development Environment, not Intelligent Drive Electronics . . . bloody
> overlapping acronyms . . . but I digress . . . ).
>
> Even some basic syntax highlighting would improve the readability of
> extensions.conf immense
We are currently working on a WBEM-based management system for Asterisk.
If you are familiar with Novell ZenWorks or Microsoft's MMC or the
like, you know what I mean.
Greg
Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hank
S
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hank
> Sent: November 22, 2004 3:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk gui?
>
>
> hello is there a gui that would allow me to configure everything from
> phones, to extent
Original Message -
From: "Chris TenHarmsel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk gui?
It kind of depends.
The
It kind of depends.
There's AMP, but it's set-up is non-trivial.
That's the only one I've tried.
-Chris
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:57:22 -0800, hank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hello is there a gui that would allow me to configure everything from
> phones, to extentions, to voice mail to basicl
Short
answer: No.
Long
answer: There are GUI's that allows for *most* basic configurations but they are
usually incomplete in their implementation so at some point or another, you
*will* have to edit a .conf file.
The
closest I have seen, and the one I use for day-to-day is AMP at htt
> The source code found heere http://www.holgerschurig.de/destar.html
> is in an unsupported TAR format.
It isn't. It's tarred and bzip2'd. If your tar can't do this, then you can
resort to this:
bzip2 -d *.tar.bz2 | tar xv
But tar nowaday has the "j" option for bzip2 and the "z" option to
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 11:16 -0400, Kanuri, Seshu wrote:
> The source code found heere http://www.holgerschurig.de/destar.html is in an
> unsupported TAR format.
>
tar jxvf is all you need.
--
Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Asterisk-Users mail
-Users] Asterisk Gui client
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 03:33 am, Holger Schurig wrote:
> Would you mind looking at http://www.holgerschurig.de/destar.html and
> install it? Sorry, I can't give you an link for an online presentation
> becaus
> A program that can hold you hand as you go along is very nice. What you
> could also do is add help screens that gives more in depth
> descriptions. But I'm looking forward to see your product as it grows!
Yeah, help screens could be good. Or, when you enter the config, it can
say
* You should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 03:33 am, Holger Schurig wrote:
> Would you mind looking at http://www.holgerschurig.de/destar.html and
> install it? Sorry, I can't give you an link for an online presentation
> because I don't have access to some server where
Beware: I might be biased!
> http://67.109.153.236/*web/
> It edits extensions.conf after some customization.However unable to
> update sip.conf.
I guess you made yourself lot's of work.
However, there is already a PHP based web editor that works on this low
level of editing *.conf directly.
Hi All,
Please checkout the following GUI web panels, which have
been created and installed from the source code available
in this forum.
http://67.109.153.236/*web/
It edits extensions.conf after some customization.However unable to
update sip.conf.
http://67.109.153.236/asterisk-stat/cdr
database in the phones table.
Thanks a lot!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of mattf
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 9:55 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Gui client
Hello,
What version of the astguicl
Hello,
What version of the astguiclient suite are you using?
What version of PHP are you using?
Do you have GLOBAL_VARS turned on or off?
It's very strange that being a POST all of the variables seem to be showing
up on the URL like a GET would. also it doesn't sem to be submitting to the
admin
Right now it really helps if you are a programmer or someone who is familiar
with the configuration of an Asterisk system to setup the astguiclient
suite. I will be adding more documentation in a few weeks and maybe even a
simple how-to or a "how I installed a new Asterisk T1->internal-VOIP system
me know.
MATT---
-Original Message-
From: Dustin Knuttgen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 9:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk GUI Client - New verison 0.9
> -Original Message-
> From: mattf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
