On 06/22/2012 12:49 AM, Ahmed Munir wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know whether SpanDSP supports T.38 for Asterisk 10?
Because as far as using Fax for Asterisk, I'm getting some issues
using T.38
Only spandsp fully supports T.38 in Asterisk 10. The Digium module
cannot work in gateway mode.
Ste
0:49 AM
> To: brya...@zktech.com; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
> Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] spandsp download
>
> On 01/22/2011 01:00 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> > Where can I get the latest stable version of spandsp. That will work
>
On 01/22/2011 01:00 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
Where can I get the latest stable version of spandsp. That will work
with res_fax_spandsp.so. The link listed on the voip-info website is
dead. Any other location for download?
http://www.soft-switch.org/
There was a server failure. It should b
Where can I get the latest stable version of spandsp. That will work with
res_fax_spandsp.so. The link listed on the voip-info website is dead. Any
other location for download?
http://www.soft-switch.org/
Thanks
Bryant Zimmerman
--
__
- "Joao Gomes Pereira" escreveu:
> Em 17-03-2010 20:51, Vinícius Fontes escreveu:
> > - "Joao Gomes Pereira" escreveu:
> >
> >
> >> Hello
> >> Im trying to receive FAXes with my Asterisk with "rxfax" command.
> >>
> >> To do that, Im trying to load the "app_fax.so" module but
> a
Em 17-03-2010 20:28, Doug Lytle escreveu:
> Joao Gomes Pereira wrote:
>
>> What could be missing?
>>
>>
>>
> Running ldconfig as root
>
>
>
>
Thanks, thats it!!!
Now the module is loaded.
I just hope the FAX code works:
[macro-faxreceive]
exten => s,1,Set(FAXFILE=/var/spool/asteri
Em 17-03-2010 20:51, Vinícius Fontes escreveu:
> - "Joao Gomes Pereira" escreveu:
>
>
>> Hello
>> Im trying to receive FAXes with my Asterisk with "rxfax" command.
>>
>> To do that, Im trying to load the "app_fax.so" module but asterisk
>> says:
>>
>> [Mar 17 20:06:04] WARNING[11907]:
- "Joao Gomes Pereira" escreveu:
> Hello
> Im trying to receive FAXes with my Asterisk with "rxfax" command.
>
> To do that, Im trying to load the "app_fax.so" module but asterisk
> says:
>
> [Mar 17 20:06:04] WARNING[11907]: loader.c:359 load_dynamic_module:
> Error loading module 'ap
Joao Gomes Pereira wrote:
> What could be missing?
>
>
Running ldconfig as root
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thur
magnus, simple answer: just use the latest version available. and if
something is not working inside the t.30/t.38 protocol, try the latest
spanpshot: http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/snapshots/spandsp/?C=M;O=Dand
if something i still not working, give a good description how to
reproduce the pr
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 09:58:40PM +0800, Steve Underwood wrote:
> On 12/04/2009 06:54 PM, Magnus Benngård wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > What version of spandsp is recommended to use when u compile
> > asterisk-trunk?
> The next one, or if that hasn't been released yet, the current one.
Specifically?
-
On 12/04/2009 06:54 PM, Magnus Benngård wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What version of spandsp is recommended to use when u compile
> asterisk-trunk?
The next one, or if that hasn't been released yet, the current one.
Steve
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided
Michael wrote:
> Hello-
>
> Firstly thanks very much for the work you have put into SpanDSP and the time
> you spend to assist people here :-)
>
> I am currently running SpanDSP 0.0.5 with Call Weaver. Is there any or
> sufficient gain to be had from upgrading SpanDSP?
>
I don't follow the sta
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 08:12:51PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 07:16:05PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> >> Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
> >> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 05:02:16PM +0100, Olivier wrote:
> >> >> I tried to add app_rxfax/app_txfax to a
Olivier schrieb:
> 2008/11/26 Philipp Kempgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Yup. libspandsp is a build-dependency (in contrast to a normal
>> runtime dependency). Thus you need the -dev package.
> I was not aware of such build-dependency packages.
> Does that mean I could remove build-dependency packa
Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 07:16:05PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
>> Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
>> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 05:02:16PM +0100, Olivier wrote:
>> >> I tried to add app_rxfax/app_txfax to a running asterisk 1.6.0. on Lenny.
>> >> I followed http://www.voip-info.org
2008/11/26 Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> aptitude install libspandsp-dev
>
It did it !
Thanks, very much.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options v
2008/11/26 Philipp Kempgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yup. libspandsp is a build-dependency (in contrast to a normal
> runtime dependency). Thus you need the -dev package.
>
>
> Philipp Kempgen
>
I was not aware of such build-dependency packages.
Does that mean I could remove build-dependency packag
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 07:16:05PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 05:02:16PM +0100, Olivier wrote:
> >> I tried to add app_rxfax/app_txfax to a running asterisk 1.6.0. on Lenny.
> >> I followed http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk
Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 05:02:16PM +0100, Olivier wrote:
>> I tried to add app_rxfax/app_txfax to a running asterisk 1.6.0. on Lenny.
>> I followed http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20T.38 :
>>
>> apt-get install libspandsp1
>> cd /usr/src/asterisk-1.6.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 05:02:16PM +0100, Olivier wrote:
> I tried to add app_rxfax/app_txfax to a running asterisk 1.6.0. on Lenny.
> I followed http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20T.38 :
>
> apt-get install libspandsp1
> cd /usr/src/asterisk-1.6.0.1
> ./configure
> make clean
Edwin,
I feel your pain. I struggled getting fax to work reliably with both
1.2 and 1.4 versions. Any combination I tried, usually caused a crash.
I recently upgraded to 1.6.beta4 and installed the app_fax from the
addons installation and it worked first time out of the box :-)
I've received
You can also take a look at the T.38 product from Attractel.
http://attractel.com/faxterisk.php
Disclaimer, I work for these guys.
Chris
On Sun, November 25, 2007 4:11 pm, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Olivier wrote:
>
>> Robert,
>>
>>
>> Do you mean T.38 passthrough ou T.38 to T.30 gateway ?
>> The
Olivier wrote:
> Robert,
>
> Do you mean T.38 passthrough ou T.38 to T.30 gateway ?
> The former is said to work with Asterisk 1.4 but the latter is not ...
I know about what Asterisk 1.4 can do. And Asterisk 1.2 only does T.30
passthrough :) You need 'stuff' to handle fax. Stuff like spandsp,
Robert,
Do you mean T.38 passthrough ou T.38 to T.30 gateway ?
The former is said to work with Asterisk 1.4 but the latter is not ...
Cheers
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You need a T38 gateway of sorts, sort of like the app_t38gateway of
> CallWeaver.
>
the app_rxfax and app_txfax applications in 0.0.4 of spandsp won't provide it?
It seems, functionally, that with spandsp supporting T.38, simple dialplans
where you call a SIP exte
On Wednesday 21 November 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You need a T38 gateway of sorts, sort of like the app_t38gateway of
> CallWeaver.
>
> However digium refuses to include such a program with Asterisk.
It's not a matter of refusal; it's a matter of licensing. We don't have any
package that
You need a T38 gateway of sorts, sort of like the app_t38gateway of CallWeaver.
However digium refuses to include such a program with Asterisk.
On Nov 21, 2007 6:13 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that Spandsp has everything in it (when you include rxfax and
> txfax) to
Might want to look into you libtiff version and / or the presence of tiff2pdf.
Just a guess.
Bryan Johns
Partner
Shelton | Johns
Office: 678.248.2637
FindMe: 678.229.1809
http://www.sheltonjohns.com
- Original Message -
From: "Sahil Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hello Garth,
* Garth van Sittert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [13-04-07 01:27]:
> Has anyone managed to get Asterisk 1.2 faxes working reliably with
> spandsp 0.0.3? I am running Asterisk 1.2.17 and spandsp 0.0.3pre28 with
> a Digium b410p card. Everything compiled smoothly but only about 70% of
> fax
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
What are the advantages of T31 over T30 ?
T.30 is the spec for fax protocol. T.31 is the spec for a Class 1 fax
modem.
So T.31 is a layer that allows something else to perform fax protocol
(T.30) through it.
There may be some intrinsic value to handling faxing
Hi
On 12/21/06, Lee Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
spandsp is a dsp library with lots of pieces to it. IAXmodem uses the
T.31 portion (the Class 1 modem) which uses the actual DSP parts of
V.21, V.29, and V.27ter (and potentially V.17). However, the bulk of
the fax protocol is actually per
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
I don't see why rxfax would be less reliable than iaxmodem/hylafax as
it's using the same spandsp to receive fax.
spandsp is a dsp library with lots of pieces to it. IAXmodem uses the
T.31 portion (the Class 1 modem) which uses the actual DSP parts of
V.21, V.29, a
>I don't see why rxfax would be less reliable than iaxmodem/hylafax as
>it's using the same spandsp to receive fax.
I will defer to Lee Howard on this but IIRC the big factor is ECM which is
not supported in SpanDSP. And another difference is that it is *HylaFAX*
that is recieving the fax itself r
Hi
On 12/21/06, Colin Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I second that. After struggling with rxfax (which was total cake to set up,
but reception reliability in my specific installation was poor) I bit the
bullet and put in a separate Hylafax server connected to my Asterisk box
with a crossov
Hi
On 12/20/06, Lee Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, I guess. The fax detection part comes from Asterisk or OpenPBX or
whatever. Same as with rxfax/txfax, etc.
Well, I know have Hylafax and iaxmodem running on my machine.
Works really well so far and with spandsp 0.0.3
Will see how it
Colin Anderson wrote:
AFAIC, Hylafax + IAXmodem is the way to go for anything serious, unless we
are talking about thousands of users and thousands of faxes per day. I don't
even know what could be scaled to that scenario and not be unmanageable.
For the thousands and thousands scenario you c
>Does IAXmodem allows you to receive faxes with any extensions
>(auto-detecting incoming faxes).
You just let Asterisk do the fax detection for you, and when it hears CNG,
send it to the fax extension, and your fax extension would just Dial() one
of the IAXmodems (using IAX)
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sure in an small office you can use iaxmodem/hylafax to receive faxes
- we use it for sending faxes, but would you try to set up about 100
iaxmodems inside hylafax if you can handle it directly inside asterisk
with rx_fax and a small script ?
Yes, I would, actually
Hi,
sure in an small office you can use iaxmodem/hylafax to receive faxes - we
use it for sending faxes, but would you try to set up about 100 iaxmodems
inside hylafax if you can handle it directly inside asterisk with rx_fax
and a small script ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 20.12.2006 02:17:2
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hi
On 12/20/06, Lee Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This thread seems like an awfully crazy amount of work to get fax
working when using IAXmodem and HylaFAX would do it without the
headache, most likely.
Does IAXmodem allows you to receive faxes with any extensi
Hi,
No IaxModem is only a "modem simulator".
Let asterisk do the difference, and send it to you iax extension...
@++.
Jean-Yves Avenard a écrit :
Hi
On 12/20/06, Lee Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This thread seems like an awfully crazy amount of work to get fax
working when using IAXmo
Hi
On 12/20/06, Lee Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This thread seems like an awfully crazy amount of work to get fax
working when using IAXmodem and HylaFAX would do it without the
headache, most likely.
Does IAXmodem allows you to receive faxes with any extensions
(auto-detecting incoming
This thread seems like an awfully crazy amount of work to get fax
working when using IAXmodem and HylaFAX would do it without the
headache, most likely.
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UN
On 12/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
a few weeks ago I encountered the same problem.
I found out that asterisk is crashing when app_rxfax.so is calling line 327
of app_rxfax.c 'ast_frfree(int);' out of the testing tree running with
actual spandsp-0.0.3
commenting this line
a few weeks ago I encountered the same problem.
I found out that asterisk is crashing when app_rxfax.so is calling line
327 of app_rxfax.c 'ast_frfree(int);' out of the testing tree running
with actual spandsp-0.0.3
commenting this line out it doesn't crash *, but that's no solution
it do work w
Hi
On 12/18/06, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you provide a backtrace of the crash?
Sure.
I've attached a backtrace for both 1.2.13 and 1.2.14 running the same
version of spandsp and all other libraries.
This is on a Fedora Core 6 machine
(I can not attach the message as it mak
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 07:17:56PM +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> Hi
>
> Last month, people reported a crash with Asterisk 1.2.13 and
> spandsp-0.0.3 when receiving a fax using fax detection.
>
> Today I've tried 1.2.14 with the latest spandsp 0.0.3pre27 and with
> the snapshots for app_rxfax.
Hi
On 12/18/06, Danny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am using CentOS 4.4 [ asterisk-1.2.12.1 ]
I too had problems with RxFax application.
I tried spandsp-0.0.2pre26 & spandsp-0.0.3pre23
.0.2 > could install, but it crashed
.0.3 > doesnt install
I never had any problems installing spandsp 0.0.
Hi,
I am using CentOS 4.4 [ asterisk-1.2.12.1 ]
I too had problems with RxFax application.
I tried spandsp-0.0.2pre26 & spandsp-0.0.3pre23
.0.2 > could install, but it crashed
.0.3 > doesnt install
Finally I got 0.0.2pre26 running on debian sarge 3.1, without a crash !
- Danny
Jean-Yves Ave
Hi
Last month, people reported a crash with Asterisk 1.2.13 and
spandsp-0.0.3 when receiving a fax using fax detection.
Today I've tried 1.2.14 with the latest spandsp 0.0.3pre27 and with
the snapshots for app_rxfax.c and app_txfax.c.
The problem still happens.
Has anyone found how to resolve
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 02:25:30PM -0800, daveasterisk wrote:
>-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2]
> RxFAX("SIP/xxx.xxx.xx.xx-0821ec78", "/tmp/recievedfax.tif") in new stack
>saster*CLI>
>
> and that is where it just sits. no further messages.
> the target file does not exist and the di
A little progress on this problem
Examining the logs i found a weird looking 'soft hangup' which
reminded me on an earlier issue we had. (and the reason why we were
still on the 'i' release of bristuff). It looked as if the channel
hung up just before rxfax actually could begin to work.
N
> On 16 nov 2006, at 12:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > please check if the old spandsp-version is kompletly removed
> It is.
>
> > do you use the rxfax/txfax version out of the soft-switch/snapshots-
> > folder
> > ??? if not - try them
>
> From my original msg:
>
> >> The app_rxfax.c in
On 16 nov 2006, at 12:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please check if the old spandsp-version is kompletly removed
It is.
do you use the rxfax/txfax version out of the soft-switch/snapshots-
folder
??? if not - try them
From my original msg:
The app_rxfax.c in use is from:
[http://www.soft
please check if the old spandsp-version is kompletly removed
do you use the rxfax/txfax version out of the soft-switch/snapshots-folder
??? if not - try them
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 16.11.2006 11:27:36 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using spandsp-0.0.3
> [http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/snapshots/sp
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 02:32:55PM +0300, Giedrius Augys wrote:
>
>Hi,
>I have problem installing spandsp-0.0.3pre24 on FreeBSD 6.1. I get
>error: configure: error: "Can't build without libtiff" . But I have
>installed tiff from port tiff-3.8.2. I understand that the problem is
>
2006/10/23, Steve Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 10/23/06, Giedrius Augys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Hi,> I have problem installing spandsp-0.0.3pre24 on FreeBSD 6.1. I get error:> configure: error: "Can't build without libtiff" . But I have installed tiff
> from port tiff-3.8.2. I understand th
On 10/23/06, Giedrius Augys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have problem installing spandsp-0.0.3pre24 on FreeBSD 6.1. I get error:
configure: error: "Can't build without libtiff" . But I have installed tiff
from port tiff-3.8.2. I understand that the problem is about libtiff, and
spandsp can'
2006/10/5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
try the rx_fax
and tx_fax below the snapshot-tree
within test-apps-asterisk-1.x
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/snapshots/spandsp/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am
04.10.2006 22:11:43:
> 2006/10/4, Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Giedr
try the rx_fax
and tx_fax below the snapshot-tree
within test-apps-asterisk-1.x
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/snapshots/spandsp/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am
04.10.2006 22:11:43:
> 2006/10/4, Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Giedrius Augys wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Now I'm testing fa
2006/10/4, Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Giedrius Augys wrote:> Hi,> Now I'm testing faxes with spandsp. I have problems that spandsp do> not add headers to fax page: LOCALHEADERINFO.> Please help me.There is a bug in adding page header with
spandsp-0.0.2pre26. I havefixed this in the deve
Giedrius Augys wrote:
Hi,
Now I'm testing faxes with spandsp. I have problems that spandsp do
not add headers to fax page: LOCALHEADERINFO.
Please help me.
There is a bug in adding page header with spandsp-0.0.2pre26. I have
fixed this in the development code, but I haven't yet put the fix
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 08:14:27PM +0800, Steve Underwood wrote:
> >Now introduce VoIP telephony... where a small amount of audio
> >corruption (jitter) is anticipated on the UDP channel... and mix it
> >with faxing and hopefully you can see how it just doesn't work well.
> >VoIP is packetized
Lee Howard wrote:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 01:58:21PM -0700, Christopher Corn wrote:
A couple of faxing methods im confused about.
The pass through method, sending fax data over G711 codec
versus
Relay method, t30 to t38 conversion
Can someone explain to me why the pass through met
linksys spa3102 or 2100 are known to work.
Grandstream also should do it with recent firmware.
Don't be fooled by what is written on the box, lot of ata's out there
claim t.38. (while the firmware doesnt contain anything related to t.38)
Zoa
Christopher Corn wrote:
lee,
Thanks for the fee
lee, Thanks for the feedback. in most diagrams explaining t38, it shows, the sending fax machine connecting to a pots before connecting to a gateway,then the internet. but if i've read and understood correctly, the sending end can use an ATA with t38 support instead of a pots. in that case
Christopher Corn wrote:
May I ask, from your own personal experience. is it not necessaritly
worth (the headaches) of investing mytime into setting up SPANDSP into
my asterisk system, but rather invest it into going to a company, like
packet8 that offers t38 conversion?
I am not really in a
Lee and everyone else that replied, Thanks for the valuable and very detailed explanation. May I ask, from your own personal experience. is it not necessaritly worth (the headaches) of investing mytime into setting up SPANDSP into my asterisk system, but rather invest it into going to a compa
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:17:22PM -0700, Lee Howard wrote:
> So, to answer your questions...
>
> Why does using G.711 not require T.38? Because from the viewpoint that
> the question was given, G.711 and T.38 are competing approaches. T.38
> was designed to replace G.711. You can packetize G
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 01:58:21PM -0700, Christopher Corn wrote:
A couple of faxing methods im confused about.
The pass through method, sending fax data over G711 codec
versus
Relay method, t30 to t38 conversion
Can someone explain to me why the pass through method doesn't
requir
Christopher Corn wrote:
I've been reading about FOIP and there something i dont undrestand.
maybe someone can explain to me.
A couple of faxing methods im confused about.
The pass through method, sending fax data over G711 codec
versus
Relay method, t30 to t38 conversion
Can someone expla
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 01:58:21PM -0700, Christopher Corn wrote:
>I've been reading about FOIP and there something i dont undrestand. maybe
>someone can explain to me.
>
>A couple of faxing methods im confused about.
>
>The pass through method, sending fax data over G711 codec
>
Well I got it resolved. Thanks steve for telling me. I looked all
around the filesystem and found some files I did not delete from
spandsp0.0.3. I saw that solution before and tried it and it didn't
seem to work and I wondered why but now i know. Thank you.
Chris
On Aug 24, 2006, at 10:54 AM
Christian Jensen wrote:
I have not found any solution to the problem I am talking about in
the archives Steve. I have reinstalled and downgraded from pre26 to
pre21 of SpanDSP 0.0.2 and still to no avail. I have followed all
the instructions and ways of fixing this problem and have found n
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 09:29 -0400, Christian Jensen wrote:
> I have not found any solution to the problem I am talking about in
> the archives Steve. I have reinstalled and downgraded from pre26 to
> pre21 of SpanDSP 0.0.2 and still to no avail. I have followed all
> the instructions and way
I have not found any solution to the problem I am talking about in
the archives Steve. I have reinstalled and downgraded from pre26 to
pre21 of SpanDSP 0.0.2 and still to no avail. I have followed all
the instructions and ways of fixing this problem and have found none
to be a solution.
-
Christian Jensen wrote:
I am running Asterisk 1.2.7 and SpanDSP0.0.2 with Kernel version
2.6.17-1.2141_FC4. I am getting an error after compiling the SpanDSP
and putting the .c files in the correct place and then patching the
make file. All goes well but then when asterisk is opened, I get
- Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp debug or logging
|
|Anton Krall wrote:
|> Maybe this is a stupid question but how to you enable debubg or
|> logging on spandsp? I see you can do that for RXFAX but when people
|> tell you to enable debug on spandsp, do they
Anton Krall wrote:
Maybe this is a stupid question but how to you enable debubg or logging on
spandsp? I see you can do that for RXFAX but when people tell you to enable
debug on spandsp, do they mean this with rxfax or how do you do it with
spandsp?
You can do it writing:
exten => s,1,rxfax(/
pre25 is working fine for me.
On 2/19/06, Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is anyone successfully using spandsp 0.0.2pre25 with either asterisk 1.0.x or
> 1.2.4? I've built a Gentoo ebuild for this version of spandsp and app_rtxfax,
> and it builds, but I'm not having any
Yes, I have compiled and used rxfax succesfully on 1.0.9, 1.0.10 and 1.2.4
to receive from analog fax machines. I have never yet been able to get
rxfax working with txfax - my debugs when I try look like the logs in your
email.
Craig
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EM
Line 103 in Makefile has multiple spaces at the beginning instead of TAB character.
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 10:19 +0800, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
I cannot see it
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/svn-versions/asterisk/pbx'
/bin/sh: curl-config: command not found
make[1]: Entering
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
I cannot see it
Found it!!! Tab and spaces are hard to see,
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/svn-versions/asterisk/pbx'
/bin/sh: curl-config: command not found
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/svn-versions/asterisk/apps'
Makefile:103:
Andy Kuo wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Are you using
>exten => fax,1,rxfax(. in extensions.conf
>and
>faxdetect=both in zapata.conf?
>
>
Hmmm. I was using "faxdetect=incoming" -- is that wrong? I'll give
"both" a shot -- though the fax machine, itself, is on a POTS line.
>If yes, have you tried assign
Hi,
Are you using
exten => fax,1,rxfax(. in extensions.conf
and
faxdetect=both in zapata.conf?
If yes, have you tried assigning an extension number for receiving
fax? (instead of the "fax" extension)
Andy
On 1/18/06, Ken D'Ambrosio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all. I've got a fax ex
I'm doing this from memory, so there may be errors. I'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2.2
as a base, though I'd added a bunch of RPMs for things like fonts
along the way.
Install hylafax - if you [EMAIL PROTECTED], there's a CentOS RPM for hylafax
you
can use. I believe I had to install some (obvious
Ben Fried wrote:
Just to be clear, I have inbound and outbound faxes working with my
TDM400, by going the iaxmodem and hylafax route. No need for a
separate modem or an x100p card.
Be
Ah, that's interesting. Can you provide some details on how you set it up?
Phil
Just to be clear, I have inbound and outbound faxes working with my
TDM400, by going the iaxmodem and hylafax route. No need for a
separate modem or an x100p card.
Be
On 1/16/06, Philip Edelbrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Ben Fried wrote:
> > Since writing my message, I appear to have had
Ben Fried wrote:
Since writing my message, I appear to have had success using iaxmodem
+ hylafax to do inbound faxing. Setup was not completely obvious,
especially if you're usin [EMAIL PROTECTED], like me, I finally seem to have
inbound
faxes working properly now - 5 or 6 in a row have all co
Since writing my message, I appear to have had success using iaxmodem
+ hylafax to do inbound faxing. Setup was not completely obvious,
especially if you're usin [EMAIL PROTECTED], like me, I finally seem to have
inbound
faxes working properly now - 5 or 6 in a row have all come in just
fine.
Ben
Ben Fried wrote:
On 1/9/06, Rich Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry in advance if this is a FAQ...
I've got a working Asterisk setup based on [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.2. I have a
TDM400
card with 2 FXS and 2 FXO ports; PSTN connections come in via the TDM
card.
I haven't been able to get
I think he was using a buggy TIFF viewer. There are a *lot* of buggy
TIFF viewers.
Steve
James Sizemore wrote:
Shawn, you ever get a fix for this problem?
> samples are at
> http://tumtum.no-ip.com/faxes/1128432831.3.tif
> http://tumtum.no-ip.com/faxes/853107320051004-150908.tif
> Both of
Do you have the spandsp libraries in your library path?, by default they go
into /usr/local/lib
Craig
- Original Message -
From: "Tomislav Parcina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 10:32 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Spandsp
I have tried to install spandsp.
makefile.patch is buggy.
Compile app_rxfax and app_txfax by hand.
Mimmus
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk
Ben Fried wrote:
On 1/9/06, Adam Goryachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd strongly suggest that people having problems, and who are interested
in marketing this as a solution, do some testing with different
motherboards/systems/etc and find a combination that works. Once you
have that, simpl
On 1/9/06, Adam Goryachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 11:40 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote:
> > > It would be very interesting to know the real numbers that have it
> > > working.
> > > The archives (and about two/three years of attempting to help others with
> > > the exact same
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 11:40 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote:
> > It would be very interesting to know the real numbers that have it working.
> > The archives (and about two/three years of attempting to help others with
> > the exact same problem) suggests no better then maybe one in ten or twenty
> > wil
> It would be very interesting to know the real numbers that have it working.
> The archives (and about two/three years of attempting to help others with
> the exact same problem) suggests no better then maybe one in ten or twenty
> will ever get spandsp to work with the digium x100p or TDM card.
Rich Adamson wrote:
I'm certainly not the expert on this topic, but I believe the issue has
to do with the pci bus and probably relates to the TigerJet chip used on
the card. Until that's addressed, any analog modem use through the card
will be marginal at best. (Same issue as with the older x10
1 - 100 of 391 matches
Mail list logo
