Hello,
I'm currently doing some server load testing using the SIPp test suit to
quantify the effects of running Asterisk natively under the operating
system versus running under a virtual machine. Using AstLinux 4.8, as
virtual machine images were available for this version of Astlinux. I'm
also
I reckon any testing you do should use the same Distribution & Asterisk
config on VM AND Bare metal.
if you feel you need to use Astlinux in the VM, then use it also on bare
metal.
go from there... otherwise your comparing apples with oranges..
too many potential differences to even consider it
Please use a recent version! 0.4.8 is so old it's not a good
representation. You should be able to boot and use any recent ISO image
in vmware.
Pirow Engelbrecht wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently doing some server load testing using the SIPp test suit to
> quantify the effects of running A
On Sep 14, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Tom Mazzotta wrote:
> 3. Regarding the addressing, astlinux lead me to believe that it
> supported a dynamic end-point because the default value in the local-
> host ip field is $EXTIP. Is this a legit value, or should I change
> it to the actual IP used by the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck
wrote:
>
> On Sep 14, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Tom Mazzotta wrote:
>
> > 3. Regarding the addressing, astlinux lead me to believe that it
> > supported a dynamic end-point because the default value in the local-
> > host ip field is $EXTIP. Is this a legi
That's an excellent question, because I am already using DynDNS. Lonnie, do you
think this would work?
From: David Kerr [mailto:da...@kerr.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 9:34 AM
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] VPN with Cisco PIX
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:10
On Sep 15, 2009, at 8:33 AM, David Kerr wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck > wrote:
>
> On Sep 14, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Tom Mazzotta wrote:
>
> > 3. Regarding the addressing, astlinux lead me to believe that it
> > supported a dynamic end-point because the default value
FYI, changing the address on the astlinux side definably helped. However, even
after doing that and adding double-quotes the pre-shared key (on the PIX side
only) we are still not connecting. The final error is "phase1 negotiation
failed due to time up", phase 2 is also failing (due to timeout o
Tom,
IPsec "info" log level is usually quite useful on the AstLinux side.
Either post it here, or email me privately.
Yes, "Group 2" for Phase one and "PFS Group: 2" for Phase 2. If the
PIX has "PFS Group: none" or "No perfect forward secrecy" this needs
to be changed.
Lonnie
On Sep 1
Environment: Astlinux 0.6.2 on a net5501. Canon MX700 scanner/printer/
fax/copier plugged into a Grandstream HT502 ATA.
Background: My VoIP provider recently changed their side so that g711
no longer works so my in band fax "solution" broke. The VoIP
provider's support team says they can prov
10 matches
Mail list logo
