Chris Mason (Lists) wrote:
Darrick Hartman wrote:
Really? It was a very popular thing to do on IOS routers...
Re-read what I said. In my mind it IS something that many people may
want. That's why I thought it would be something beneficial to be in
Arno's firewall upstream and not
494f7ec0.5020...@masonc.com 494fe175.1050...@redfish-solutions.com
Message-ID: e6b12e59a1d0aa9f2a8db51a1146c...@localhost
X-Sender: dhart...@djhsolutions.com
Received: from 64.246.240.54 [64.246.240.54] with HTTP/1.1 (POST); Mon, 22 Dec
2008 14:42:08 -0600
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1
Hi Phillip,
I am on the way out the door. But if you want to send me (or the list) the
parameters. I would like to take a look for you tomorrow am.
Lach
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Philip A. Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Shot in the dark, but anyone on the list
Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Philip A. Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Shot in the dark, but anyone on the list really good at iptables?
I've been trying to figure out how to do something and it's simple
enough... but not obvious how to do
What I'm trying to do is this.
Let's say I have some service that runs on port 101 (hypothetically).
I want to continue to run it on that port internally, but I want to
relocate it on my external interface because I'm tired of it being
port-scanned, and it's no a particularly secure service.
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
What I'm trying to do is this.
Let's say I have some service that runs on port 101 (hypothetically).
I want to continue to run it on that port internally, but I want to
relocate it on my external interface because I'm tired of it being
port-scanned, and it's
Darrick Hartman wrote:
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
What I'm trying to do is this.
Let's say I have some service that runs on port 101 (hypothetically).
I want to continue to run it on that port internally, but I want to
relocate it on my external interface because I'm tired of it
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
Darrick Hartman wrote:
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
What I'm trying to do is this.
Let's say I have some service that runs on port 101 (hypothetically).
I want to continue to run it on that port internally, but I want to
relocate it on my external
Darrick Hartman wrote:
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
Darrick Hartman wrote:
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
What I'm trying to do is this.
Let's say I have some service that runs on port 101 (hypothetically).
I want to continue to run it on that port internally, but I
