On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:39:25PM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
> I don't have an ath5k based card at hand. I will try to grab one and
> will give an example of said frame. Basically, I followed the same
> strategy for ath9k already.
Are you saying that this patch has not actually been tested a
Jouni Malinen a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:39:25PM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
>
>> I don't have an ath5k based card at hand. I will try to grab one and
>> will give an example of said frame. Basically, I followed the same
>> strategy for ath9k already.
>>
>
> Are you saying t
Bob Copeland a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:06:29PM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
>
>>> Can you tell what the functional difference is between the old code and new
>>> code? E.g. a padding that would be incorrectly computed from before?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Correct. On some frames
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:22:41PM -0800, shashi raj singh wrote:
>
>
> Hi Mohammad,
>
> ath5k can only work on one channel at a time as COTS hardware works only on
> one channel at a time. For your approach, you will require two wireless
> interfaces (two radio cards). Put one in AP mode (you
