Thanks for your reply, Bob.
My problem is not exactly compatibility of hardware. Instead, I want
the driver to send out the response as soon as it receives a packet
(when notified by interrupt ath5k_intr() ).
I am thinking of calling ath5k_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct
sk_buff *skb) inside
For research purpose, I want to make the Atheros wifi card to send out
Jin YunYe,
this is *NOT* targeted especially to you, so please don't be offended.
Can it be the case that research is a mostly a one-way road? Every other
week I read from someone For a research we need to do this and
Hello ath5k-list and linux-wireless-list!
I am sorry, if this is a double-post. I sent this message to the wrong
address before. I apologize.
For testing reasons I would like to disable backoff times in ath5k.
In the code of ath5k we have the macro AR5K_TXQ_FLAG_BACKOFF_DISABLE in
file
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Matthew Garrett m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 01:39:07PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Last I reviewed CONFIG_PCIEASPM won't buy you *anything* other than
debugging knobs. With it you can force all devices to enable ASPM
completely on or
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 01:39:07PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Last I reviewed CONFIG_PCIEASPM won't buy you *anything* other than
debugging knobs. With it you can force all devices to enable ASPM
completely on or disable it. Both of which I think are not really
useful and instead should
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:17:11AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Why would you only want to enable ASPM for one device?
ASPM doesn't
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Jin YunYe yunye...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply, Bob.
My problem is not exactly compatibility of hardware. Instead, I want
the driver to send out the response as soon as it receives a packet
(when notified by interrupt ath5k_intr() ).
I am thinking
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 09:48:40AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Sure, I agree with that, but it also will enable ASPM for *all*
devices which have the capability which IMHO is a terrible idea for
users when all they want to do is enable ASPM for one device. Instead
I recommend users to
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:17:11AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Why would you only want to enable ASPM for one device?
ASPM doesn't always work for all devices even if they do advertise
ASPM capability so turning
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:40:15AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org
wrote:
Right, which we have to deal with by having drivers disable ASPM on
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:28:20AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
People who use force deserve whatever they get,
Heh, this whole patch and thread was started because Jussi tested
ath5k with pcie_aspm=force (on a
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:44:26AM -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:28:20AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org
wrote:
People who use force deserve whatever they get,
Heh, this whole patch and
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Johannes Stezenbach j...@sig21.net wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 07:44:26PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:28:20AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Heh, this whole patch and thread was started because Jussi tested
ath5k with
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Johannes Stezenbach j...@sig21.net wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 07:44:26PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:28:20AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Heh,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 09:48:40AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Sure, I agree with that, but it also will enable ASPM for *all*
devices which have the capability which IMHO is a terrible idea for
users when all
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 07:44:26PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:28:20AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Heh, this whole patch and thread was started because Jussi tested
ath5k with pcie_aspm=force (on a pre PCIE 1.1 device (?)) . I have
been trying to explain
Hi, Bob.
Great thanks for your help!
Best Regards
YY
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Bob Copeland m...@bobcopeland.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Jin YunYe yunye...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply, Bob.
My problem is not exactly compatibility of hardware. Instead, I
17 matches
Mail list logo
