Paula K wrote:
> Jaco Kroon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
the biggest rate is 18M, if i test with a rate > 18M i loose my
connection (i can't ping anything)t
>> I'm seeing the same thing. For most of my needs this is fast enough,
>> but higher speeds would be useful :).
>>
>> Jaco
2008/9/23 Brian Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Nick Kossifidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2008/9/22 Brian Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ath5k is much slower then madwifi. Best speed I could get with iwconfig
was
24Mb, Higher speeds did not respo
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Nick Kossifidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/22 Brian Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Ath5k is much slower then madwifi. Best speed I could get with iwconfig was
>>> 24Mb, Higher speeds did not respond. Same location, same computer, same AP
>>> with
>>>
2008/9/22 Brian Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Ath5k is much slower then madwifi. Best speed I could get with iwconfig was
>> 24Mb, Higher speeds did not respond. Same location, same computer, same AP
>> with
>> madwifi I get the full 54Mb with no drops. This will be a blocker for eeepc
>> us
> Ath5k is much slower then madwifi. Best speed I could get with iwconfig was
> 24Mb, Higher speeds did not respond. Same location, same computer, same AP
> with
> madwifi I get the full 54Mb with no drops. This will be a blocker for eeepc
> users and distros with the 2.6.27 kernels
I'm ch
Jaco Kroon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> the biggest rate is 18M, if i test with a rate > 18M i loose my
> >> connection (i can't ping anything)t
>
> I'm seeing the same thing. For most of my needs this is fast enough,
> but higher speeds would be useful :).
>
> Jaco
>
Ath5k is much slo
alban wrote:
> alban wrote:
>> Nick Kossifidis wrote:
>>> 2008/9/8 alban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:11 AM, alban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> To be sure that the driver is good i reboot (not shutdown!) my computer,
>> the result is the sam
alban wrote:
> Nick Kossifidis wrote:
>> 2008/9/8 alban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Bob Copeland wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:11 AM, alban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To be sure that the driver is good i reboot (not shutdown!) my computer,
> the result is the same: Excellent.
>
>
Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> 2008/9/8 alban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Bob Copeland wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:11 AM, alban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To be sure that the driver is good i reboot (not shutdown!) my computer,
the result is the same: Excellent.
But when i shutdo
2008/9/8 alban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bob Copeland wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:11 AM, alban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> To be sure that the driver is good i reboot (not shutdown!) my computer,
>>> the result is the same: Excellent.
>>>
>>> But when i shutdown and starting my computer the
Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:11 AM, alban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> To be sure that the driver is good i reboot (not shutdown!) my computer,
>> the result is the same: Excellent.
>>
>> But when i shutdown and starting my computer the bit rate is at 1Mb/s
>> and the network is
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:11 AM, alban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To be sure that the driver is good i reboot (not shutdown!) my computer,
> the result is the same: Excellent.
>
> But when i shutdown and starting my computer the bit rate is at 1Mb/s
> and the network is useless !!!
So, just to c
Hello,
I try often the latest driver of ath5k to replace madwifi, but i have
always the same problem.
I compile compat-wireless with checkinstall on debian. Before installing
package, I'm sure that madwifi is deleted and the modules are unloaded.
I load ath5k module and restart my connection:
13 matches
Mail list logo
