On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:07:28 -0500
"Bob Copeland" wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Fabio Rossi wrote:
> > The patch for an empty hidden SSID is already in wireless-testing
> > (commit bae888b3ea89097dcb8b28573d8bd6fa1147bc31) but it's slightly
> > different from the one I had proposed in
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Fabio Rossi wrote:
> The patch for an empty hidden SSID is already in wireless-testing (commit
> bae888b3ea89097dcb8b28573d8bd6fa1147bc31) but it's slightly different from the
> one I had proposed in the thread recalled by Bob.
So it is, thanks Fabio. It looks lik
On Monday 05 January 2009, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Geoffrey McRae wrote:
> > Isn't that patch slightly wrong anyway?
> >
> > If the length of the ssid is 0 why check its first byte? Without looking
> > at the surrounding code, if that buffer is not allocated and we c
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Geoffrey McRae wrote:
> Isn't that patch slightly wrong anyway?
>
> If the length of the ssid is 0 why check its first byte? Without looking
> at the surrounding code, if that buffer is not allocated and we check
> the bytes value, it could cause a seg fault.
As it
Isn't that patch slightly wrong anyway?
If the length of the ssid is 0 why check its first byte? Without looking
at the surrounding code, if that buffer is not allocated and we check
the bytes value, it could cause a seg fault.
I would think that the better way to write this would be:
if ((ssid_
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 07:56:22AM +0100, manuel.f...@chello.at wrote:
> it seems as if there is a problem with the hidden network. I can't
> uncloak the SSID because it isn't my network. Could you please tell me
> if I did something wrong?
This sounds similar to the problem from this thread:
hi,
as the topic already tells it, I can't connect to a known wpa2 network anymore.
I used to connect to it via wpa_supplicant in the past with 2.6.27.1, which
worked fine, but since I did the upgrade to 2.6.28 it doesn't work anymore. My
entry in the wpa_supplicant.conf looks like this:
netwo
