I found the cause of TPC malfunction. As I assumed early, usage of
AR_PHY_POWER_TX_RATE_MAX register in AR9380 is incorrect. The following
lines should be removed from ar9003_phy.h file.
These registers does not exists:
--- ar9003_phy.h.orig 2011-03-30 16:25:00.0 +0600
+++ ar9003_phy.h
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Alex Hacker hac...@epn.ru wrote:
I found the cause of TPC malfunction. As I assumed early, usage of
AR_PHY_POWER_TX_RATE_MAX register in AR9380 is incorrect. The following
lines should be removed from ar9003_phy.h file.
These registers does not exists:
---
Alex, you are GREAT! Thank you so much!
For some reason whatsoever we missed checking the AR_PHY_PWRTX_MAX register.
We checked everything regarding power settings, but as the AR_PHY_PWRTX_MAX
is never used we must have missed that. After a quick check, everything
works perfect. Great job!
Best
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:36:06PM +0800, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2011-07-11 8:52 AM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
Also constify buf_addr for ath9k_hw_process_rxdesc_edma() to verify
assumptions --- dma_sync_single_for_device() call can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Michał
On 12.07.2011, at 17:55, Michał Mirosław mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:36:06PM +0800, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2011-07-11 8:52 AM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
Also constify buf_addr for ath9k_hw_process_rxdesc_edma() to verify
assumptions --- dma_sync_single_for_device()
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 08:54:32PM +0800, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 12.07.2011, at 17:55, Michał Mirosław mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:36:06PM +0800, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2011-07-11 8:52 AM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
Also constify buf_addr for
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:37:00 +0800
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Camilo, Tony, etc:
Please read this article and try what they're suggesting. It has to do
with an APSM commit which has negatively impacted some users (eg by
causing hangs.) Sound familiar? :)
On 12.07.2011, at 21:03, Michał Mirosław mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 08:54:32PM +0800, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 12.07.2011, at 17:55, Michał Mirosław mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:36:06PM +0800, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2011-07-11 8:52
Hi!
That's great news.
Please create a couple of linux kernel bugzilla reports, one for each device.
Someone related to the Debian project commented earlier on this bug;
perhaps they'd like to be told too.
thanks! I'm so very, very glad we all got to the bottom of this complete mess.
(I'm glad
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:21:05PM +0800, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 12.07.2011, at 21:03, Michał Mirosław mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 08:54:32PM +0800, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 12.07.2011, at 17:55, Michał Mirosław mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12,
On 12.07.2011, at 23:58, Michał Mirosław mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:21:05PM +0800, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 12.07.2011, at 21:03, Michał Mirosław mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 08:54:32PM +0800, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 12.07.2011, at
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi!
That's great news.
Please create a couple of linux kernel bugzilla reports, one for each device.
Someone related to the Debian project commented earlier on this bug;
perhaps they'd like to be told too.
thanks!
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:04:50AM +0800, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 12.07.2011, at 23:58, Michał Mirosław mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:21:05PM +0800, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 12.07.2011, at 21:03, Michał Mirosław mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12,
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:53:16PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
In the case we're analysing, the ownership is on the device's side
until it stops writing the buffer.
Just to be clear, this should say: ... until it marks the buffer as done.
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
Is there an 802.11n PCI-E ath9k card available that does 300Mbps and
works in AP mode?
- Grant
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
All the 2x2 AR9280 (2/5ghz) and AR9287 (2ghz) NICs.
adrian
On 13 July 2011 06:10, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there an 802.11n PCI-E ath9k card available that does 300Mbps and
works in AP mode?
- Grant
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
It sounds like you are looking for a PCIe, not miniPCIe solution. If that is
the case, it may be easiest to buy a PCIe to miniPCIe adaptor card off eBay
for about $10 (US), then buy whatever miniPCIe card you like as there are a
lot more models available in that form factor.
A favorite of
It sounds like you are looking for a PCIe, not miniPCIe solution. If that is
the case, it may be easiest to buy a PCIe to miniPCIe adaptor card off eBay for
about $10 (US), then buy whatever miniPCIe card you like as there are a lot
more models available in that form factor.
A favorite of mine
Again, anything with an AR9280 on board will be fine. Some of the
antenna arrangements though are a bit .. special.
Adrian
On 13 July 2011 09:20, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds like you are looking for a PCIe, not miniPCIe solution. If that is
the case, it may be easiest to buy
19 matches
Mail list logo
