OK, I took my current Fedora Kernel and applied a patch to remove the
commit mentioned above, basically removing aspm_clear_state ... I
found that it DIDN'T cure the problem. I am wondering if any of the
other Fedora patches (some are ASPM related) might not help. I did
have to go beyond the change
On Jul 13, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Grant wrote:
>> Again, anything with an AR9280 on board will be fine. Some of the
>> antenna arrangements though are a bit .. special.
>
> I'm told this one fits the bill:
>
> http://www.tp-link.com/products/productDetails.asp?pmodel=TL-WN951N
>
> It is said to hav
>>> Again, anything with an AR9280 on board will be fine. Some of the
>>> antenna arrangements though are a bit .. special.
>>
>> I'm told this one fits the bill:
>>
>> http://www.tp-link.com/products/productDetails.asp?pmodel=TL-WN951N
>>
>> It is said to have a AR5008 chip. Can anyone confirm th
> It sounds like you are looking for a PCIe, not miniPCIe solution. If that is
> the case, it may be easiest to buy a PCIe to miniPCIe adaptor card off eBay
> for about $10 (US), then buy whatever miniPCIe card you like as there are a
> lot more models available in that form factor.
>
> A favori
* On 14.07.2011 08:56 PM, Grant wrote:
> Will I need to hack the kernel source in order to use an 802.11n card
> in AP mode?
In general, no. But depending on your setup and the card's EEPROM
(hardcoded world regulatory domain for instance), you may run into some
regulatory issues* and are required
* On 14.07.2011 08:54 PM, Grant wrote:
> Alright, you guys win. I'll buy a miniPCIe card and adapter.
_
_Really, there is no other good solution anyway, and using an adapter
let's you exchange cards/chips even more easily or maybe share them also
between Laptops and such, that's actually pretty gr
I have found an interesting workaround that seems quite effective and
requires no code changes for a Fedora user with my hardware... would
be interested to see if anyone else can reproduce this or explain why
it fixes the problem.
Recall I was trying to audit the Fedora kernel ASPM related patches
Hi,
Camilo Mesias wrote:
> Anyway reading the code and understanding a little about the changes
> that had worked, I saw that there was another option for pcie_aspm.
> Tony had tried pcie_aspm=off previously but it seemed to me that
> pcie_aspm=force might be worth a try. I tried it with the
> 2.
>> Will I need to hack the kernel source in order to use an 802.11n card
>> in AP mode?
>
> In general, no. But depending on your setup and the card's EEPROM
> (hardcoded world regulatory domain for instance), you may run into some
> regulatory issues* and are required to patch the module, yeah.
>
>> The only thing that worries me about the Ubiquiti SR71-E is the "very high
>> power"
>> aspect which I've also read about on various websites.
>
> If you don't want to go for the Ubiquiti model, I can recommend the
> SparkLan WPEA-127N card (AR9380 chip). Using it for about a month,
> getting d
10 matches
Mail list logo
