[ath9k-devel] Implement Software Based (SLOW) Diversity for AR9283(0)

2015-05-15 Thread Luiz de Barros Oliveira Neto
Hello, All, I have a configuration where I want to use an AR9283 device in a Diversity only scenario (without MIMO). Radio chipset is connected to an AR7241 SoC and is running OpenWRT Linux distro. Device is being used as bridged station (Not AP) and has 2 chains, connected to different antennas,

Re: [ath9k-devel] Implement Software Based (SLOW) Diversity for AR9283(0)

2015-05-16 Thread Luiz de Barros Oliveira Neto
g on one chain only. > > > -adrian > > > On 15 May 2015 at 17:01, Luiz de Barros Oliveira Neto > wrote: > > Hello, All, > > > > I have a configuration where I want to use an AR9283 device in a > Diversity > > only scenario (without MIMO). Radio chipset

[ath9k-devel] AR9280 TX99 Control TX Power Output

2016-02-11 Thread Luiz de Barros Oliveira Neto
Hello, All, After doing some hacking on the ath9k code that is part of compaq-wireless-2015-03-09, I have being doing some verifications of an AR9280 based embedded radio using the TX99 feature (used for regulatory certification). I was able to turn the functionality on/off, change data rates, ena

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9280 TX99 Control TX Power Output

2016-02-11 Thread Luiz de Barros Oliveira Neto
it easily at the command level. Since my use of TX99 was for > regulatory testing, that was sufficient for my needs. > > John Clark. > > On Feb 11, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Luiz de Barros Oliveira Neto < > lbon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, All, > > > > After

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9280 TX99 Control TX Power Output

2016-02-11 Thread Luiz de Barros Oliveira Neto
a per paket level should be sufficent .. right ? Are you saying > when you set the global power level via > letlink/iw it is not repsected in the actual attenuation you see at the > antenna ports ? > > Greetings THomas > > Am 11.02.2016 um 23:31 schrieb Luiz de Barros Olive