Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

Tim Bray wrote: On Jan 31, 2005, at 4:37 AM, Robert Sayre wrote: 05-C05, 4.15.3 processing model "If the value of "type" begins with "text/" the content of atom:content MUST NOT contain child elements." See 4.15.2: so is this a SHOULD or a MUST? It's a MUST, and not an editorial change. If it's

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

On Jan 31, 2005, at 4:37 AM, Robert Sayre wrote: 05-C05, 4.15.3 processing model "If the value of "type" begins with "text/" the content of atom:content MUST NOT contain child elements." See 4.15.2: so is this a SHOULD or a MUST? It's a MUST, and not an editorial change. If it's a MUST then <

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

Julian Reschke wrote: Robert Sayre wrote: 'atom:head elements MUST contain at least one atom:link element with a rel attribute value of "alternate".' Point taken. How about 'atom:head elements MUST contain at least one atom:link element with a relation of "alternate".' Can't we just get rid of

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

Robert Sayre wrote: Point taken. How about 'atom:head elements MUST contain at least one atom:link element with a relation of "alternate".' Can't we just get rid of the defaulting? That would make the spec simpler with little additional verbosity in the instance documents. In this case, my pref

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

Robert Sayre wrote: 'atom:head elements MUST contain at least one atom:link element with a rel attribute value of "alternate".' Point taken. How about 'atom:head elements MUST contain at least one atom:link element with a relation of "alternate".' Can't we just get rid of the defaulting? That wo

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

Julian Reschke wrote: Thanks for the feedback, Robert... Robert Sayre wrote: - "rel" attribute is missing The rel attribute is optional and the relation is considered to be "alternate" in that case. http://atompub.org/2005/01/27/draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.html#rel_attribute

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

Sam Ruby wrote: Julian Reschke wrote: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> Less: < (hope I got these right). This is not only right, but also a good example of why many people would prefer to have another element so that they don't have to deal with prefixes: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

Thanks for the feedback, Robert... Robert Sayre wrote: - "rel" attribute is missing The rel attribute is optional and the relation is considered to be "alternate" in that case. http://atompub.org/2005/01/27/draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.html#rel_attribute

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

Julian Reschke wrote: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> Less: < (hope I got these right). This is not only right, but also a good example of why many people would prefer to have another element so that they don't have to deal with prefixes: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>Less: < T

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

Julian Reschke wrote: 05-C01, 1.2 Example Inconsistencies: - version attribute (whitespace) Will fix. - "rel" attribute is missing The rel attribute is optional and the relation is considered to be "alternate"

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

Tim Bray wrote: On Jan 30, 2005, at 12:21 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: The issues were collected after reading the spec top-to-bottom, and trying to produce an Atom-05 feed from an existing RSS-1.0 feed through XSLT. Most of them are editorial. Good stuff, Julian. Thanks. "If the value of type begi

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

On Jan 30, 2005, at 12:21 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: The issues were collected after reading the spec top-to-bottom, and trying to produce an Atom-05 feed from an existing RSS-1.0 feed through XSLT. Most of them are editorial. Good stuff, Julian. "If the value of type begins with "text/" or ends

Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

Hi, first I'd like to thank the editors for the good work. The issues were collected after reading the spec top-to-bottom, and trying to produce an Atom-05 feed from an existing RSS-1.0 feed through XSLT. Most of them are editorial. Best regards, Julian -- snip -- 05-C01, 1.2 Example