Re: Deterministic content models (conflict with Atom Publishing Protocol?)

2005-05-24 Thread Norman Walsh
/ Martin Duerst [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | If there is actual non-determinism now in the Atom core, that would be | a reason for concern. If there is potential non-determinism in the Look at the content model for entry: it's a bag o' stuff some of which is required and some of which is

Re: Deterministic content models (conflict with Atom Publishing Protocol?)

2005-05-24 Thread Thomas Broyer
Norman Walsh wrote: Look at the content model for entry: it's a bag o' stuff some of which is required and some of which is optional (and optionally repeatable) and it's all allowed to occur in any order. I've forgotten the details of XSD's support for content models, but I'm pretty sure

Re: Deterministic content models (conflict with Atom Publishing Protocol?)

2005-05-23 Thread Martin Duerst
Hello Thomas, At 07:34 05/05/22, Thomas Broyer wrote: I'm sorry to raise this issue back again but... The Atom Publishing Protocol defines SOAP bindings. This (in my mind) means there will be WSDL files over there. WSDL rely on XML Schema which in turn are limited to deterministic content

Re: Deterministic content models (conflict with Atom Publishing Protocol?)

2005-05-23 Thread Thomas Broyer
Martin Duerst wrote: At 07:34 05/05/22, Thomas Broyer wrote: I'm sorry to raise this issue back again but... The Atom Publishing Protocol defines SOAP bindings. This (in my mind) means there will be WSDL files over there. WSDL rely on XML Schema which in turn are limited to

Re: Deterministic content models (conflict with Atom Publishing Protocol?)

2005-05-23 Thread Norman Walsh
/ Thomas Broyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | I'm sorry to raise this issue back again but... | | The Atom Publishing Protocol defines SOAP bindings. This (in my mind) | means there will be WSDL files over there. WSDL rely on XML Schema | which in turn are limited to deterministic content

Re: Deterministic content models (conflict with Atom Publishing Protocol?)

2005-05-23 Thread Thomas Broyer
Norman Walsh wrote: There is no 1:1 correspondence between schemas and documents. You can have as many schemas as you want. If your application demands additional constraints, such as determinism, you can define your own schema that enforces them. Then your system will reject documents

Re: Deterministic content models (conflict with Atom Publishing Protocol?)

2005-05-23 Thread Thomas Broyer
Thomas Broyer wrote: I Agree, though many HTML pages which I've looked at the source has their HEAD content in the form: * TITLE * META * LINK * STYLE or SCRIPT * SCRIPT or STYLE so a deterministic content model would be a pain I think... Wow! Sorry, it would NOT be pain

Deterministic content models (conflict with Atom Publishing Protocol?)

2005-05-21 Thread Thomas Broyer
I'm sorry to raise this issue back again but... The Atom Publishing Protocol defines SOAP bindings. This (in my mind) means there will be WSDL files over there. WSDL rely on XML Schema which in turn are limited to deterministic content models. Will the APP limit Atom entries in SOAP