Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

2005-01-31 Thread Julian Reschke
Thanks for the feedback, Robert... Robert Sayre wrote: - rel attribute is missing The rel attribute is optional and the relation is considered to be alternate in that case. http://atompub.org/2005/01/27/draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.html#rel_attribute

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

2005-01-31 Thread Julian Reschke
Sam Ruby wrote: Julian Reschke wrote: atomTitle type=XHTML xmlns:xhtml=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; Less: xhtml:em lt; /xhtml:em /atomTitle (hope I got these right). This is not only right, but also a good example of why many people would prefer to have another element so that they don't have

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

2005-01-31 Thread Robert Sayre
Julian Reschke wrote: Thanks for the feedback, Robert... Robert Sayre wrote: - rel attribute is missing The rel attribute is optional and the relation is considered to be alternate in that case. http://atompub.org/2005/01/27/draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.html#rel_attribute

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

2005-01-31 Thread Julian Reschke
Robert Sayre wrote: 'atom:head elements MUST contain at least one atom:link element with a rel attribute value of alternate.' Point taken. How about 'atom:head elements MUST contain at least one atom:link element with a relation of alternate.' Can't we just get rid of the defaulting? That would

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

2005-01-31 Thread Tim Bray
On Jan 31, 2005, at 4:37 AM, Robert Sayre wrote: 05-C05, 4.15.3 processing model If the value of type begins with text/ the content of atom:content MUST NOT contain child elements. See 4.15.2: so is this a SHOULD or a MUST? It's a MUST, and not an editorial change. If it's a MUST then

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

2005-01-31 Thread Julian Reschke
Tim Bray wrote: On Jan 31, 2005, at 4:37 AM, Robert Sayre wrote: 05-C05, 4.15.3 processing model If the value of type begins with text/ the content of atom:content MUST NOT contain child elements. See 4.15.2: so is this a SHOULD or a MUST? It's a MUST, and not an editorial change. If it's a

Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

2005-01-30 Thread Julian Reschke
Hi, first I'd like to thank the editors for the good work. The issues were collected after reading the spec top-to-bottom, and trying to produce an Atom-05 feed from an existing RSS-1.0 feed through XSLT. Most of them are editorial. Best regards, Julian -- snip -- 05-C01, 1.2 Example

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

2005-01-30 Thread Tim Bray
On Jan 30, 2005, at 12:21 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: The issues were collected after reading the spec top-to-bottom, and trying to produce an Atom-05 feed from an existing RSS-1.0 feed through XSLT. Most of them are editorial. Good stuff, Julian. If the value of type begins with text/ or ends

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

2005-01-30 Thread Julian Reschke
Tim Bray wrote: On Jan 30, 2005, at 12:21 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: The issues were collected after reading the spec top-to-bottom, and trying to produce an Atom-05 feed from an existing RSS-1.0 feed through XSLT. Most of them are editorial. Good stuff, Julian. Thanks. If the value of type

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

2005-01-30 Thread Sam Ruby
Julian Reschke wrote: atomTitle type=XHTML xmlns:xhtml=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; Less: xhtml:em lt; /xhtml:em /atomTitle (hope I got these right). This is not only right, but also a good example of why many people would prefer to have another element so that they don't have to deal with

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

2005-01-28 Thread Henry Story
On 28 Jan 2005, at 15:14, Danny Ayers wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:10:06 -0500, Robert Sayre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://atompub.org/2005/01/27/draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.html http://atompub.org/2005/01/27/draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt Thanks Robert. The Relax NG snippets make a

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-05.txt

2005-01-27 Thread Internet-Drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Atom Publishing Format and Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : The Atom Syndication Format Author(s) : M. Nottingham, R. Sayre Filename