A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Thomas Broyer [2005-05-24 15:15]:
>> A. Pagaltzis wrote:
>> > * Thomas Broyer [2005-05-24 09:05]:
>> >> c)
>> >> feed:
>> >> author: A
>> >> contributor: B
>> >> entry:
>> >> contributor: C
>> [...]
>> >> c) The entry inherits the author but overrides the
>> >>
* Thomas Broyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-24 15:15]:
> A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> > * Thomas Broyer [2005-05-24 09:05]:
> >> c)
> >> feed:
> >> author: A
> >> contributor: B
> >> entry:
> >> contributor: C
> [...]
> >> c) The entry inherits the author but overrides the
> >>contributor.
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Thomas Broyer [2005-05-24 09:05]:
>> c)
>> feed:
>> author: A
>> contributor: B
>> entry:
>> contributor: C
[...]
>> c) The entry inherits the author but overrides the contributor. I'm
>>also open to considering it invalid.
[...]
> The rule you propose for co
* Thomas Broyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-24 09:05]:
> a)
> feed:
> author: A
> contributor: B
> entry:
> no author not contributor
>
> b)
> feed:
> author: A
> contributor: B
> entry:
> author: C
>
> c)
> feed:
> author: A
> contributor: B
> entry:
> contributor
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
>
> * Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-24 01:40]:
>> Consider too a feed which has both authors and contributors at
>> the feed level, an entry with neither authors or contributors
>> (simple case of inheritance), and another entry with a single
>> author and no contri
* Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-24 01:40]:
> Consider too a feed which has both authors and contributors at
> the feed level, an entry with neither authors or contributors
> (simple case of inheritance), and another entry with a single
> author and no contributors (does the entry inheri
"If an atom:entry is copied from one feed into another feed, then the
source atom:feed's metadata (all child elements of atom:feed other
than the atom:entry elements) MAY be preserved within the copied entry
by adding an atom:source child element, if it is not already present
in the entry, and inc
On 24/5/05 10:36 AM, "Robert Sayre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/23/05, Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 24/5/05 9:56 AM, "Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> (unrelated question: what's with this plus sign " & atomLink+" in the
>>> atom:source production?)
>>>
>> well spotte
On 5/23/05, Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24/5/05 9:56 AM, "Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (unrelated question: what's with this plus sign " & atomLink+" in the
> > atom:source production?)
> >
> well spotted.
That means "oneOrMore", while "*" means "zeroOrMore". "+" is accu
On 24/5/05 9:56 AM, "Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd say it draws from atom:source OR atom:feed.
>
You meant atom:source XOR atom:feed?
> atom:feed should not be used if atom:source exists, even if it doesn't
> contain an atom:author, which it SHOULD.
>
(well, it SHOULD, unless ato
On 24 May 2005, at 12:31 am, Eric Scheid wrote:
Second area of concern with writing the spec text - the atom:source
element
needs to be mentioned in the text about inheritance. My
understanding is
that inheritance draws first from atom:source (if it exists), and then
atom:feed.
I'd say it
On 24/5/05 9:02 AM, "Thomas Broyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is mostly when there are author(s) without contributor in
> the feed (resp. entry) and contributor(s) without author in the entry
> (resp. feed).
> Is the entry author-less (resp. contributor-less) or is it inheriting
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
