mages or components, feel free
to ask on the
[centos-devel](http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel)
mailing list.
Have questions about using Atomic? See the
[atomic](https://lists.projectatomic.io/mailman/listinfo/atomic)
mailing list or find us in the #atomic channel on Fre
The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an [updated
version](https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download)
of CentOS Atomic Host (7.1906), an operating system designed to run
Linux containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the
component versions included in Red Hat Ente
The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version
(https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) of
CentOS Atomic Host (7.1902), an operating system designed to run Linux
containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the
component versions included in Red Hat Enter
The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version
(https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) of
CentOS Atomic Host (7.1811), an operating system designed to run Linux
containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the
component versions included in Red Hat Enter
The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version of CentOS Atomic
Host (7.1807), an operating system designed to run Linux containers,
built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the component versions
included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host.
CentOS Atomic Host includes these cor
Today, the Fedora Project announced [1] a new project, Fedora CoreOS,
which will serve as a successor to Container Linux and Fedora Atomic.
[1] https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-coreos/
There's an FAQ [2] that addresses, among other things, the future of
CentOS Atomic Host:
"CentOS At
The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version of CentOS Atomic
Host (7.1805), a lean operating system designed to run Linux
containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the
component versions included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host.
CentOS Atomic Host includes these
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Feld, Michael (IMS) wrote:
> centos atomic build 7.1804 seems to have broken permissions to access
> mounted volumes in OpenShift pods/containers. The mounts are successful,
> however any attempt to read/write inside the container gives a permission
> denied. Rolli
neglected to reply-all
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jason Brooks
Date: Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Trouble with cgroup when starting latest Kubelet
To: Rares Vernica
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Rares Vernica wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I inst
On Wed, May 30, 2018, 08:36 Kevin Browder wrote:
> So I'm maintaining a ostree for some EL7 images and have been using the
> "downstream" version of centos-atomic-host.json and have been for a long
> while (don't remember why I picked downstream), however I was noticing that
> the same file on ma
The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version
(https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) of
CentOS Atomic Host (7.1804), a lean operating system designed to run
Linux containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the
component versions included in Red Hat E
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 6:36 PM, Kevin Browder wrote:
> http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2018/05/fedora-atomic-27-to-28-upgrade/
> says
> "You can still install Kubernetes via package layering, or you can use
> system containers to run kubernetes fully containerized. Please
The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version
(https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) of
CentOS Atomic Host (7.1803), a lean operating system designed to run
Linux containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the
component versions included in Red Hat E
The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version
(https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) of
CentOS Atomic Host (7.1802), a lean operating system designed to run
Linux containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the
component versions included in Red Hat E
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:58:01AM -0800, Jason Brooks wrote:
>>> * drop the manual instructions from the site
>>> * tell people who want manual to go
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:58:01AM -0800, Jason Brooks wrote:
>> * drop the manual instructions from the site
>> * tell people who want manual to go read "kubernetes the hard way"
>
> I know the reference f
n Fedora (Atomic or not)?
>>
>> -
>> Chris Negus
>> Red Hat Principal Technical Writer
>> RHCA, RHCI, RHCX, RHCE
>> Author of the Linux Bible, 9th Edition
>> http://amzn.to/1IBA7NF
>
> Jason Brooks has created a number of system containers for f
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:38:21PM +, Sanja Bonic wrote:
>> Note that if we stay on 1 or 2 now, we will have to change at a later point
>> in the future in case we want to introduce FAH and FAW logos (unless
>
> FWIW the current Fedora
+1
On Feb 5, 2018 10:21 AM, "Stephen Milner" wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to move system-buildah
> (https://github.com/ashcrow/system-buildah) under the projectatomic
> GitHub namespace.
>
> system-buildah is a "simple toolbox for building system images.". It
> uses ocitools, jinja2 templa
at 9:56 AM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version
> (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) of
> CentOS Atomic Host (7.1712), a lean operating system designed to run
> Linux containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs,
The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version
(https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) of
CentOS Atomic Host (7.1712), a lean operating system designed to run
Linux containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the
component versions included in Red Hat E
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 12:34 PM, hskarlupka
wrote:
> Dusty,
>
> Do you have an ETA on the CentOS Atomic release as well? Thank you for the
> update!
We should have a CentOS Atomic release w/ the fix tomorrow evening.
Jason
>
> Heath
>
>
>
> On 01/03/2018 11:15 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>> -
logs:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-12-13/fedora_atomic_wg.2017-12-13-16.30.html
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_wg
Meeting started by jbrooks at 16:30:03 UTC (full logs).
Meeting summary
roll call (jbrooks, 16:30:08)
action items from last meeting (jbrooks, 16:34:40
Last week, the CentOS Atomic SIG released an updated version
(https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) of
CentOS Atomic Host (7.1711), a lean operating system designed to run
Linux containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the
component versions included in Re
The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version[1] of CentOS
Atomic Host (7.1710), a lean operating system designed to run Linux
containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the
component versions included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host.
[1] https://wiki.centos.org/Sp
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to find a better place where to move the system container[1]
> images that I am currently building under docker.io/gscrivano.
>
> CRI-O and Docker them are already used by the OpenShift installer to get
> the latest versi
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/atomic/2017-10-30/atomic-community.2017-10-30-16.02.html
Meeting started by jbrooks at 16:02:13 UTC (full logs).
Meeting summary
roll-call (jbrooks, 16:02:23)
action items from last mtg (jbrooks, 16:04:31)
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/360 (jberkus, 16:06:47
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Stephen Milner wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/03/2017 09:58 AM, Stephen Milner wrote:
>>> In the last Atomic Community meeting I noted that keeping image files
>>> in sync across multiple repositories is going to become a
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/atomic/2017-09-18/atomic_community.2017-09-18-16.01.html
Meeting started by jbrooks at 16:01:37 UTC (full logs).
Meeting summary
roll call (jbrooks, 16:01:48)
action items (jbrooks, 16:04:42)
CentOS Atomic Update (jbrooks, 16:07:21)
Open Floor (jbrooks, 16:09:38)
The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version
(https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) of
CentOS Atomic Host (7.1708), a lean operating system designed to run
Docker containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the
component versions included in Red Hat
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 09/11/2017 03:20 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> First, please post any topics you have for Monday's Atomic Community
>> Meeting. Among other things, we should probably talk about CRI-O
>> support across the various projects.
>>
>>
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-09-06/fedora_atomic_wg.2017-09-06-17.00.html
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-09-06/fedora_atomic_wg.2017-09-06-17.00.log.html
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_wg
Meeting started by jbrooks at 17:00:10
summary:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-08-23/fedora_atomic_wg.2017-08-23-17.00.html
full log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-08-23/fedora_atomic_wg.2017-08-23-17.00.log.html
Meeting summary
roll call (jbrooks, 17:00:07)
action items from last
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/atomic/2017-08-21/atomic_community.2017-08-21-16.03.html
Meeting summary
ACTION: jberkus to look into replacing docs.projectatomic.io/registry
with directive to that standalone page (jbrooks, 16:06:06)
ACTION: jberkus to replace Registry docs on pa.io with standal
Last week, the CentOS Atomic SIG released an updated version
(https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) of
CentOS Atomic Host (7.1707), a lean operating system designed to run
Docker containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the
component versions included in R
full log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-07-26/fedora_atomic_wg.2017-07-26-17.03.log.html
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_wg
Meeting started by jbrooks at 17:03:13 UTC (full logs).
Meeting summary
Roll Call (jbrooks, 17:03:19)
action items from last meeting (jbrooks,
An updated version of CentOS Atomic Host (tree version 7.1706), is now
available. [1] CentOS Atomic Host is a lean operating system designed to run
Docker containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the
component versions included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host.
[1] https:
We've upgraded the ostree repo for CentOS Atomic Host (v7.1705.1) to
include the packages affected by this advisory.
You can upgrade your CentOS Atomic Host to this version with the command:
atomic host upgrade --reboot
Upgraded:
ca-certificates 2017.2.11-70.1.el7_3 -> 2017.2.14-70.1.el7_3
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 06/19/2017 11:20 AM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> Jason, KB, etc.:
>>>
>>> This is the beginning of last month's announcement:
>>>
>&g
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jason, KB, etc.:
>
> This is the beginning of last month's announcement:
>
> An updated version of [CentOS Atomic
> Host](https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download)
> (tree version 7.20170428), is
> now available ...
>
> And
An updated version of CentOS Atomic Host (tree version 7.1705), is now
available[1]. CentOS Atomic Host is a lean operating system designed to run
Docker containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the
component versions included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host.
[1] https:/
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 02:37:03PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Do we want to push ServerFault, though? I ask because of the three,
>> ServerFault seems to have comparatively poor googleability.
This could come in handy:
https://stackexch
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> Spyros Trigazis writes:
>
>> If we move to system containers, which containers we need to use?
>> Is ti recommended to maintain our own container images based on [2]?
>
> It will be better if we get only one version that we can all use.
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Spyros Trigazis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on using system containers for our kubernetes configuration.
>
> What I found a little strange in a solution like [1], is that we don't
> specify
> the version of the component. eg if i do atomic install --system
> jas
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Would people be into having a biweekly general atomic IRC meeting? This
> would include all things Atomic ... CAH, FAH, atomic CLI, skopeo &
> buildah, Commissaire, Cockpit, security, etc.
>
> The idea would be to sync up what the v
An updated version of CentOS Atomic Host (tree version 7.20170428), is
now available, featuring the option of substituting the host’s default
docker 1.12 container engine with a more recent, docker 1.13-based
version, provided via the docker-latest package.
https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestG
ners please open pull requests to fix this on
>> github.com:projectatomic/atomic-system-containers
>>
>> On 04/28/2017 03:08 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Spyros Trigazis wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> So far, I h
ons of these containers that you
can check out by swapping the tag fc25 for rawhide. They have kube
1.6.1. I haven't tested them yet, though.
Jason
>
> Spyros
>
> On 27 April 2017 at 18:59, Jason Brooks wrote:
>>
>> I've been working on running kubernetes, fla
I've been working on running kubernetes, flannel and etcd in system
containers, and setting up a cluster using the ansible scripts at
kubernetes/contrib.
I wrote a blog post about it here:
https://jebpages.com/2017/04/11/testing-system-containerized-kube-and-friends/
These are my system container
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Currently our "top 3" projects on the PA.io homepage are Atomic Host,
> Atomic Registry, and AtomicApp.
>
> Since AtomicApp is EOL, we need to replace it on the homepage.
>
> I was thinking that it might be good to replace it with "C
An updated version of CentOS Atomic Host (tree version 7.20170405), is
now available[1], including significant updates to kubernetes (version
1.5.2), etcd (version 3.1) and flannel (version 0.7).
[1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download
CentOS Atomic Host is a lean operati
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The Buildah project (https://github.com/nalind/buildah) would like to
> move under projectatomic.
+1
>
> I'm in favor of this; not entirely sure why it wasn't there in the first
> place.
>
> Objections?
>
> --
> --
> Josh Berkus
>
An updated version of CentOS Atomic Host (tree version 7.20170209), is
now available [1], including significant updates to docker (version 1.12.5),
kubernetes (version 1.4) and etcd (version 3.0.15).
[1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download
CentOS Atomic Host is a lean ope
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:37:31AM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> Here is a summary of what is in updates-testing vs what is in updates:
> [...]
>> To rebase to the updates-testing tree just run:
>> rpm-ostree rebase fedora-atomic/25/x86_64/test
A new CentOS Atomic Host release (7.20170117), based on CentOS 7.1611,
is now available. Beyond the rebase to the new CentOS version, the
biggest change in this release is the removal of the kubernetes-master
package from the image, a change that we’ve inherited from RHEL
Atomic.
You can run the m
I think it would be worth getting these into fedora's layered build
system, too.
On Jan 11, 2017 20:10, "Dusty Mabe" wrote:
>
>
> On 01/11/2017 11:27 AM, Jerry Zhang wrote:
> > As we are moving forward with the system container effort,
> > I would like to add the images to the projectatomic doc
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> So, I've done some testing, thanks to Dusty's setup.
>
> I wasn't able to test on Kubernetes because of some setup issues.
I just tested kubernetes on f25 atomic w/ overlay2 -- worked as expected.
> However, I hammered away at Docker using som
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 12/12/2016 05:41 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/12/2016 05:19 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 12/12/2016 05:19 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>>
>>> After I get a bug[1] fixed and out the door I'm going to publish
>>> a blog post/
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> After I get a bug[1] fixed and out the door I'm going to publish
> a blog post/docs on setting up Fedora 25 Atomic host and/or Cloud
> base to use overlay2 as the storage driver for docker.
>
> I'd like for everyone that can to test this out a
On Dec 6, 2016 17:22, "Josh Berkus" wrote:
Folks,
Given all of the changes in the platform, it's time to rewrite and
re-organize the Atomic Host documentation. Here's what I'm thinking for
structure:
* Introduction
* Installation
* Vagrant
* Public Cloud
* ISO
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 11/22/2016 03:27 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
>> Copying Devan as well since he's been working with kubeadm for a while.
>>
>>> On Nov 22, 2016, at 5:25 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>>>
>>>> On T
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>
> On 11/22/2016 05:15 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Currently, it is not possible to run Kubeadm with SELinux enabled.
>>
>> This is bad; it means that Kubernetes' official installation
>> instructions include `setenforce 0`. But it's hard to
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>
> On 11/22/2016 04:25 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/22/2016 02:59 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>>>> I'd like to
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>
> On 11/22/2016 02:59 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>> I'd like to start a projectatomic repo for fedora/centos kube
>> dockerfiles, and I'd like to build them under the projectatomic docker
>> hub namespa
I'd like to start a projectatomic repo for fedora/centos kube
dockerfiles, and I'd like to build them under the projectatomic docker
hub namespace.
This is my test repo: https://github.com/jasonbrooks/k8s-images. I
have branches for centos and for f25, and I've built docker images
associated with
per for us, but if I could point to successful
> deployments my life will be a little bit easier.
>
> In any case thanks for getting back to me and also thanks again to Jason
> Brooks who contacted me directly.
Ah, I forgot to include the list in those replies -- we don't have a
list of u
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> Latest F25 Vagrant box:
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7256/16027256/Fedora-Atomic-Vagrant-25-20161010.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box
>
also:
[vagrant@localhost ~]$ systemctl status rpm-ostreed
Warning: rpm-ostreed.service
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Colin, others:
>
> Any idea when 1.12 will show up in Fedora Atomic/Centos Atomic?
> Currently it's in continuous, but with system containers now a real
> thing, users will want 1.12 soon ...
Looks like soon for fedora:
https://bodhi.fedoraproj
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Peter wrote:
> On 08/30/2016 11:04 AM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Peter wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/30/2016 10:44 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (Moving r
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Peter wrote:
> On 08/30/2016 10:44 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
>>
>> (Moving release announcements here since I think more people read it than
>> atomic@)
>>
>
> In running through the changes I think we need to publish updated
> instructions for getting going with k
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Richard Henwood
wrote:
>
>> > Well, enabling the raspberry Pi would be nice, but not really the main
>> > target. As fun at the Pis are to play with, I'm a lot more concerned
>> > with enabling folks who want to really build systems, and that means
>>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Partly due to lugging my micro-cluster around, I've been getting a lot
> of interest in having an ARM port of Atomic Host (ARM64, mostly). Not
> just hobby user interest, but interest from SDN and IoT makers.
>
> I'm raising this on
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Jonathan Lebon wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> For instance, I bring up a two node, one master cluster w/ atomic
>> fedora or centos, using the kube/contrib ansible, and then I run the
>> projectatomic/guestbookgo-atomicapp, locate automatically-assigned
>
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> 2016-08-18 8:04 GMT+03:00 Dusty Mabe :
>> I believe I am able to recreate this issue. Will try to investigate some
>> more tomorrow.
>
>
> Thanks! I think that i have two problems - first - atomic host does
> not have mdadm at all.
> Seco
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, at 04:59 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>>
>> A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be
>> downloaded at:
>>
>> Images can be found here:
>>
>> https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/dow
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> I'd like to replace Registry on the home page, because (a) it's not new
> anymore and (b) it's not really ready to install if you're not using the
> rest of openshift.
>
> Right now we have:
>
> Atomic Host Atomic App Registry
>
> Th
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Mark Dyer wrote:
> We are evaluating Atomic Host, but our development has been knocked on its
> ear several times by upstream changes to Atomic Host and friends. We need a
> way to compose trees and be assured that we are getting a specific, already
> tested collec
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Jonathan Lebon wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> Folks,
>>
>> Bringing this to atomic-devel because I'm not sure that it isn't an
>> issue with centos Atomic ISOs as well. Also, I'm not quite sure where
>> the rule is coming from.
>
> They come from the ipt
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> Hello all,
> The original schedule for today's Fedora Two-Week Atomic Release
> was going to include a cut-over of our back end Release Infrastructure
> and AutoCloud automated QA environment to be compose based (one of the
> building block
On Jun 9, 2016 12:51 PM, "Colin Walters" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I initially suggested moving
https://github.com/cgwalters/centos-release-atomic-host-devel into CentOS:
> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2016-June/014835.html
> But they're too slow, and it seems equally at home in
github
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar
wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 08:47:12AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/09/2016 08:18 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar
>> > wrote:
>&g
There are test images available for what will be the next CentOS
Atomic Host release:
https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/sig-atomic/downstream/images/
After we've done some testing, we'll update the official CentOS Atomic
Host ostree repo, probably early next week, and announce the release.
We're go
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> **CentOS Virt SIG**
>
> What:
> - 'docker' (v1.9) http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10878
> - 'docker-latest' (v1.10) http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10881
> - both can be installed simultaneously and don't step on e
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Vitor Lobo wrote:
>
> Hello guys.
>
>
> As a user of the Docker, I would like to discuss a better offer to the
> Anaconda installer (inside the atomic project). Well, the anaconda project is
> very interesting for both servers, and to desktop ' s. However, in the
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 9:23 PM, solarflow99 wrote:
> Hi, thanks. What i'm seeing isn't very straight forward, with no working
> example. looks like a weak point with atomic, all the configuration has to
> be done manually each time, aside from setting the user passwords and a few
> basic change
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> For Atomic Host, we have two OSS flavors: Fedora and CentOS. Should we
> combine the docs on both of these, with dual links where appropriate?
> I'm thinking yes, because we can't really maintain two sets of separate
> docs.
Combin
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> hi,
> i see that the atomic devel list is very active many people working on
> many things and probably there are some clear directions and goals, but
> it's not really clear for outsiders. imho it'd be very useful to clarify
> a few things:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Micah Abbott wrote:
> Hi folks-
>
> At my $DAYJOB, I do QE for RHEL Atomic Host. We have a collection of
> automation that we use to test releases and I was tasked on moving those
> tests upstream [1][2].
>
> The tests were originally developed using UATFramework [
- Original Message -
> From: "Josh Berkus"
> To: atomic-devel@projectatomic.io
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 4:22:10 PM
> Subject: [atomic-devel] Drop the bare metal install guide?
>
> Folks,
>
> Most of the Atomic bare-metal install guide is simply cribbed from the
> main Fedora d
- Original Message -
> From: "Justin Garrison"
> To: atomic-devel@projectatomic.io
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 11:07:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Who can Slack?
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:56 AM,
> wrote:
>
> > Do you think kubernetes would give us a channel? Frankly, w
An updated version of CentOS Atomic Host (version 7.20160224) is now
available for download[1]. CentOS Atomic Host is a lean operating system
designed to run Docker containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs,
and tracking the component versions included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Atomic Host.
Here are the minutes from last week's centos atomic sig meeting:
https://www.centos.org/minutes/2016/centos-devel.2016-02-11-16.03.txt
See you at the meeting tomorrow at 16:00 UTC in #centos-devel.
Jason
o
ask on the centos-devel
(http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel) mailing list.
Have questions about using Atomic? See the atomic
(https://lists.projectatomic.io/mailman/listinfo/atomic) mailing list or
find us in the #atomic channel on Freenode.
---
Jason Brooks
Red Hat Open S
- Original Message -
> From: "Josh Berkus"
> To: atomic-devel@projectatomic.io
> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 12:14:01 AM
> Subject: [atomic-devel] Concerns about pushing Docker 1.10 into Fedora23
>
> Folks,
>
> We were discussing the changes in Docker 1.10 at DevConf and became ver
- Original Message -
> From: "Matt Micene"
> To: "Jonathan Lebon"
> Cc: "atomic-devel" , "container-tools"
>
> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 12:48:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Landing pages
>
> The current swing at a Vagrant based doc is here:
>
> https://github.com/nzwulfin
- Original Message -
> From: "Daniel J Walsh"
> To: "Dusty Mabe" , atomic-devel@projectatomic.io,
> container-to...@redhat.com
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 8:40:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] AtomicApp/Nulecule Design and Workflow
>
>
>
> On 11/12/2015 06:19 PM, Dusty Mabe
- Original Message -
> From: "Joe Smithian"
> To: "Jason Brooks"
> Cc: atomic-devel@projectatomic.io
> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 12:42:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Can we use CentOS Atomic ostree-rpm in
> offline/local upgrade mod
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Miller"
> To: atomic-devel@projectatomic.io
> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 10:26:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] [PATCH] Re: Fedora atomic host 23 and ansible
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015,
- Original Message -
> From: "Joe Smithian"
> To: atomic-devel@projectatomic.io
> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 7:49:17 AM
> Subject: [atomic-devel] Can we use CentOS Atomic ostree-rpm in offline/local
> upgrade mode?
>
> Hello,
>
> I am interested in using CentOS atomic for its
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
