Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

x27;t have a card I can easily test. Cheers Stephen Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network Original message From: "mo.ucina" Date:30/01/2015 12:38 AM (GMT+10:00) To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net <http://ATrpms.net>" ,Collier Family

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

nt from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network Original message From: "mo.ucina" Date:30/01/2015 12:38 AM (GMT+10:00) To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" ,Collier Family Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35 On 29/01/15

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

On 29/01/15 23:04, mo.ucina wrote: Hello Guys, Just tried the new rev 173 drivers , and still no good . I am not getting to graphics screen still . This is the error from syslog : [19.001] (II) LoadModule: "nvidia" [19.001] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module nvidia [19.001] (II)

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

Hello Guys, Just tried the new rev 173 drivers , and still no good . I am not getting to graphics screen still . This is the error from syslog : [19.001] (II) LoadModule: "nvidia" [19.001] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module nvidia [19.001] (II) UnloadModule: "nvidia" [19.001] (

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

anuary 19, 2015 5:41 PM Thanks I'll make the changes. Stephen Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network Original message From: NullDev Date:20/01/2015 8:26 AM (GMT+10:00) To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

PM Thanks I'll make the changes. Stephen Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network Original message From: NullDev Date:20/01/2015 8:26 AM (GMT+10:00) To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

nt from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network Original message From: NullDev Date:20/01/2015 8:26 AM (GMT+10:00) To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35 I had similar issues. I ended up creating 2 sym

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

On 22/01/2015 1:03 AM, Duncan Brown wrote: On 21/01/2015 13:43, NullDev wrote: Duncan Brown wrote: This error has been around for ages: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/2013-June/013739.html It would be nice to get it sorted, I have no idea how but I have great faith in Stephen

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

On 22/01/2015 1:24 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: If I remember well, it is a python script. It is not really difficult to rewrite ... The problem is that I am using intel graphics 4000, and several apple computers, and gave up nvidia. For day to day work it is more than enough for me. I only h

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

If I remember well, it is a python script. It is not really difficult to rewrite ... The problem is that I am using intel graphics 4000, and several apple computers, and gave up nvidia. For day to day work it is more than enough for me. I only have one 8500 card at work. Therefore, it is difficu

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

On 21/01/2015 13:43, NullDev wrote: Duncan Brown wrote: This error has been around for ages: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/2013-June/013739.html It would be nice to get it sorted, I have no idea how but I have great faith in Stephen :) Dunc I've only recently (as in the las

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

S4 on the Telstra 4G network Original message From: NullDev Date:20/01/2015 8:26 AM (GMT+10:00) To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35 I had similar issues. I ended up creating 2 symlinks and the problem went away:

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

k Original message From: NullDev Date:20/01/2015 8:26 AM (GMT+10:00) To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35 I had similar issues. I ended up creating 2 symlinks and the problem went away: /usr/lib64/vd

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

m: NullDev Date:20/01/2015 8:26 AM (GMT+10:00) To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35 I had similar issues. I ended up creating 2 symlinks and the problem went away: /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 -> ../nvidia-g

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

Collier wrote: Thanks I'll make the changes. Stephen Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network Original message From: NullDev Date:20/01/2015 8:26 AM (GMT+10:00)To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long te

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

bout ATrpms.net" Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35 Here is the errors from the log : Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc gdm: Child process 1100 was already dead. Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

check more closely.  Cheers Stephen Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network Original message From: "mo.ucina" Date:20/01/2015 2:17 PM (GMT+10:00) To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

ber="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.18" (uid=0 pid=2988 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn") Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc NetworkManager[983]: Policy set 'enp5s0' (enp5s0) as default for IPv4

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

Original message From: NullDev Date:20/01/2015 8:26 AM (GMT+10:00) To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35 I had similar issues.  I ended up creating 2 syml

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

Thanks I'll make the changes.StephenSent from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network Original message From: NullDev Date:20/01/2015 8:26 AM (GMT+10:00) To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35 I had

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

I had similar issues. I ended up creating 2 symlinks and the problem went away: /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 -> ../nvidia-graphics-343.36/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 and /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so -> libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 Derek Burt Monday, Janu

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

On Mon Jan 19 2015 at 12:39:50 PM Stephen Collier wrote: > On 19/01/2015 8:27 pm, mo.ucina wrote: > > Hello Stephen, > > > > Can you please run a set of packages on this one when time permits . > > On another topic I am on the rev 169 of the current 340.65 drivers for > > el7 64bit. I know that 1

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

On 19/01/2015 8:27 pm, mo.ucina wrote: Hello Stephen, Can you please run a set of packages on this one when time permits . On another topic I am on the rev 169 of the current 340.65 drivers for el7 64bit. I know that 170 had a small bug , which prompted the 171 release . I tried the 171 but i

[ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

Hello Stephen, Can you please run a set of packages on this one when time permits . On another topic I am on the rev 169 of the current 340.65 drivers for el7 64bit. I know that 170 had a small bug , which prompted the 171 release . I tried the 171 but it gave me stuttered video on mythtv . Ha