> Arash Esbati writes:
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>> Ok, the compilation takes awfully long. Tassilo explained why, but it
>> is really annoying and makes testing a bit cumbersome .
> Do you run make with the '-j' switch? I tried building AUCTeX on my old
> Windows box with 'time make -j8' an
Uwe Brauer writes:
> Ok, the compilation takes awfully long. Tassilo explained why, but it
> is really annoying and makes testing a bit cumbersome .
Do you run make with the '-j' switch? I tried building AUCTeX on my old
Windows box with 'time make -j8' and it took around 2:20 minutes. The
>>> "IK" == Ikumi Keita writes:
>> Uwe Brauer writes:
>> Difficult to say, because there is no attached patch 😉
> Sorry!
Ok, the compilation takes awfully long. Tassilo explained why, but it is
really annoying and makes testing a bit cumbersome .
But it works!
tex-site.elc is generate
> Uwe Brauer writes:
> Difficult to say, because there is no attached patch 😉
Sorry!
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
#Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW
>From 6b1c1f6da312fc113a80bedabf703f8cff5cd6d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ikumi Keita
Date: Sat, 27 Apr
>>> "IK" == Ikumi Keita writes:
> Hi all,
> On the main branch, tex-site.elc isn't generated at the first "make"
> after "make clean" because expansion of $(wildcard *.el style/*.el) in
> GNUmakefile doesn't include tex-site.el which doesn't exist yet when we
> issue the "make".
I love to check
Hi all,
On the main branch, tex-site.elc isn't generated at the first "make"
after "make clean" because expansion of $(wildcard *.el style/*.el) in
GNUmakefile doesn't include tex-site.el which doesn't exist yet when we
issue the "make".
Does it make sense to apply the attached patch for the repr