What SS version are you using?
Some versions of the SB volume control, used 16 bit sub-integer
divisors and created rounding of 16 bit audio. This was audiable to me
and some others (but apparently not everyone!). The latest nightlies
don't do this, but only with gains of more than -30dB.
To me, deep soundstang not about the width but also the arrangement. For
example when you playing a CD on orchestra, you can identify the
position of the musical instruments with layers. That's the good
soundstage! I have this experience in my friend's home.
So is anyone can this similar
The Elpac WM075-1950 connector is the exact type and polarity required,
thus plug-n-play.
--
sleepysurf
squeezebox2 (with elpac wm075-1950-760 linear psu) direct to amp using
slimserver preamp vol control, 300gb buffalo linkstation (remote flac
audio file storage), sunfire cinema grand 200
thanks very much
--
jplatner
jplatner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2320
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=18491
___
Your first assumption may be wrong; there is a potentially relevant
diference between the SB2 and SB3 hardware. To quote Bolder CAble Co: It
contains all the same circuitry of the SB2 with one small difference. The
internal power supply for the digital buffer chips is now powered by a
linear
sleepysurf Wrote:
Nope, the WM080 has entirely different specs. See spec comparison
here...
http://www.elpac.com/uploads/documents/datasheets/WM%20REV%20A.pdf
I stand corrected. So, where can you get the 075 since it appears to
have been discontinued? Does one have to settle for the 1.2A
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 13:02 -0800, CardinalFang wrote:
If the drives were anything less than 100%
accurate, PC's wouldn't be able to install apllications or do any of
the normal things we take for granted.
Sorry, but you've got a twist or two to your thinking.
The basic idea is right. Once
pfarrell Wrote:
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 13:02 -0800, CardinalFang wrote:[color=blue]
So you should expect it to sound as good as
a $1000 or more 'audiophile' CD player.
I think that's pretty optimistic, unless living in the US means you
have to suffer some really bad 'audiophile' equipment,
I am doing my own recording into 24/96 flac format. Does anyone know if
the SB3 can handle that format, or do i need to dither down to 24/48 or
another format?
--
dhuskey
dhuskey's Profile:
I just purchased a brand new SB3, and a colleague subjected the digital
outputs to a quick jitter measurement using Audio Precision equipment.
Results:
SB3 digital coax out jitter: ~99ps
SB3 digital optical out jitter: ~892ps
My colleague's own SB1 is supposed to have digital optical out jitter
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 18:26 -0800, scan80269 wrote:
Thus, we believe that SB2/3 digital
output is superior to SB1 based on lower jitter levels.
Well, you've measured superior jitter levels.
No need to believe for the measured units.
I believe that most of the focus on jitter is hype to
I have Quad ESL 63s, and make my own ESLs and amplifiers, and I find
that the most important factor for sound stage is not the speakers
themselves, but their placement in the room, and the listener's
position relative to the speakers and walls, etc.
I also must confess the #1 soundstage
ceejay Wrote:
Be careful doing WAV first with EAC and then producing FLAC separately:
the advantage ofgoing straight to FLAC is that EAC will look up the
metadata and populate your tag information for you, which won't happen
if you do it in separate steps -
you'll have to use something
13 matches
Mail list logo
