[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Is jitter an issue with the SB? Would a Benchmark DAC1 fix it?

2006-08-02 Thread Patrick Dixon
Jitter's not relevant whilst the signal is in the digital domain (providing it's not so large as to cause data transmission errors), it's only relevant at the points where Analogue to Digital and Digital to Analogue conversion takes place. Using an external DAC (Benchmark or any other), usually

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter design question

2006-08-02 Thread 325xi
seanadams Wrote: We do what we can (wrt power regulation and signal routing) to not make it any worse once the signal is received, but obviously it can never be as good as a local clock source. Sean, I meant to ask if you employ anything ASRC or PLL based... This is important to understand

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Slim Devices Transporter?

2006-08-02 Thread Nick25
ModMike Wrote: I'm curious to know how this stacks against Patrick Dixon's SB2+, which at least at a high level, seems similar in concept. As I know of it, the SB2+ essentially replaces the major modules in the SB2 (power, DAC, SPDIF), with some improved separate modules (the Jung/ALW super

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] WMA Lossless to FLAC

2006-08-02 Thread bgrounds
Would there be an audible improvement??? If I wanted to re-rip my collection using FLAC, what exactly would I need to do? Thanks for the help. -- bgrounds bgrounds's Profile:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: WMA Lossless to FLAC

2006-08-02 Thread m1abrams
No, lossless is lossless so all else being equal no difference of audio quality. Things with slimserver you gain with FLAC is that the SB2/3 will benefit from FLAC by allowing the decoding to happen on the SB thereby reducing bandwidth by ~1/2 and allows you to FF and REW within a track. Since

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: WMA Lossless to FLAC

2006-08-02 Thread radish
And no need to rerip - you should be able to transcode with something like Foobar2000 or dbPowerAmp. -- radish radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77 View this thread:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3 I2S direct out modding etc

2006-08-02 Thread Wayne
JohnSwenson Wrote: A number of people like to put damping material or little sand bags over the crystal on their DACs, supposedly for vibration damping. I found they primarily work by thermally insullating the parts, they get hot faster and ultimately reach a higher temperature. Of course at

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Any way to improve sound quality ?

2006-08-02 Thread Deaf Cat
Anyone mentioned cable upgrades yet. (Digi Coax, IC's, Speaker cable) I've not tried playing with mains cables yet. -- Deaf Cat Deaf Cat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=515 View this thread:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Software based HDCD decoding

2006-08-02 Thread Nikhil
I was wondering what the status of this feature request was (see bug 1105). I know it's not really important, but it's been over a year since we last posted about HDCD, and I was just curious if it is even remotely on anyone's radar at the moment. N -- Nikhil

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Is jitter an issue with the SB? Would a Benchmark DAC1 fix it?

2006-08-02 Thread holmsn
Patrick Dixon Wrote: IMO you should choose your DAC based on how it sounds in your system rather than by its specification and marketing blurb: some people love the Benchmark DAC, others prefer something different. Quite agree, hadn't originally considered buying a CD player but the Quad

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Software based HDCD decoding

2006-08-02 Thread AnotherTribe
I too voted for this feature request. Like others, this is not a big deal but would certainly be the icing on my Squeezebox cake. I would really like to hear all my King Crimson remasters in their full HDCD glory! The thought of shelling out for a new HDCD amp or player for half a dozen or so

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Software based HDCD decoding

2006-08-02 Thread RalphO
This subject is something that I have been thinking about recently. The reason is that I opwn an Arcam CD player that has the capability of playing HDCD's. When a HDCD is playing in it an extra light comes on to indicate the 20 bit sampling. Unfortunately to date I have only found that I own

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Software based HDCD decoding

2006-08-02 Thread Nikhil
RalphO Wrote: The interesting thing for this thread is that I prefer to play my SB3 through the DAC of the Arcam. When I play a HDCD that I have ripped, the Arcam still detacts the 20 bit code and on comes the light. I really did not expect that a ripped CD through the SB3 would do this.

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Nasty 'tick' as track cues up...

2006-08-02 Thread JBryan
Hello, I'm new to this forum and this is my 1st post so forgive me if this has been discussed before. I recently set up a ReadyNAS/SB3 wireless network and uploaded my library (AAC, Apple Lossless, AIFF). I'm hearing a tick everytime a track begins EXCEPT with AIFF-formatted tracks. This occurs

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Software based HDCD decoding

2006-08-02 Thread JohnSwenson
The problem is that Microsoft now owns the rights to HDCD and charges a humongous fee to license it. They seem to have setup their fee structure asuming its going to chip makers who would sell the decoding chips to many different companies rather than as a software decoder to one company. If