[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3: Absolute phase shift

2007-01-05 Thread Caad
Dear Slim D Support. As an Engineer and audiophil, I do a lot of tests and development of home made DAC's As you properly know a lot of CD's are not recorded or made in absolute phase +. Acctualy a lot of Cd's , Yes even different tracks on the same CD are not recorded with same absolute

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Modifying the Squeezebox 3

2007-01-05 Thread tomjtx
dpac996;167292 Wrote: Dorkus, Well said. I would like to add that usually (consumer level products in mind) designs are constrained in both cost and time to market. The item has to be (or should) profitable for a companies success. This means that selected parts, while appropriate for the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter, after one month

2007-01-05 Thread cliveb
When I first got my Transporter, I briefly reported my initial impressions. I've had it for about a month now, and thought I would report how I feel about it. These comparisons are between the analogue outputs of both Transporter and SB2, both connected directly to the power amps of a pair of ATC

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: 24/96 on Transporter: should it work?

2007-01-05 Thread yooper
I've never owned 24/96 recordings, but now have the Best of Audiophile voices collections, as well as a few others. I have the Transporter connected to the balanced inputs im my Anthem AVM50 pre-amp and am running 2 channel direct. I do have the option to change the sampling rate to 96Khz.

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Modifying the Squeezebox 3

2007-01-05 Thread dorkus
dpac996;167292 Wrote: On another note I bought a welborne labs squeezebox linear power supply. i just came across that last night... it looks pretty similar to the other ones on the market, for better or worse (a little of both actually). but the price, while still too high IMO, is more

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Modifying the Squeezebox 3

2007-01-05 Thread Patrick Dixon
dorkus;167384 Wrote: ... unfortunately the Jung-based super regs are too low in current (most top out around 300mA), and i'm too lazy/unskilled to figure out how to modify it for increased current capacity without degrading performance. Not so. The ALWSR (which we sell on Andy's behalf)

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Modifying the Squeezebox 3

2007-01-05 Thread Robin Bowes
Patrick Dixon wrote: dorkus;167384 Wrote: ... unfortunately the Jung-based super regs are too low in current (most top out around 300mA), and i'm too lazy/unskilled to figure out how to modify it for increased current capacity without degrading performance. Not so. The ALWSR (which we sell

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter, after one month

2007-01-05 Thread Robin Bowes
cliveb wrote: Performers - dozens of mixers and effects - clipped/hypercompressed mastering - you think a few extra ps of jitter matters? No, but: Performers - high-quality mics - tape/HDR - natural mastering - I do think jitter matters. :) ___

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Modifying the Squeezebox 3

2007-01-05 Thread dorkus
Robin Bowes;167401 Wrote: and if you're doing the job properly, and replacing the internal supplies, not just the external wallwart, you'll be using multiple supplies rather than just one, so the current requirement for each one is less. that would be nice, but it's not an option at

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Modifying the Squeezebox 3

2007-01-05 Thread dpac996
as if that weren't bad enough, they throw in some total faux pas warned against in said datasheet, like putting a 2 meter wire between the regulator and load (squeezebox), or adding undamped designer film bypass caps which are pretty much guaranteed to add a nice ringing to the line when exposed

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Modifying the Squeezebox 3

2007-01-05 Thread dpac996
dorkus;167384 Wrote: i just came across that last night... it looks pretty similar to the other ones on the market, for better or worse (a little of both actually). but the price, while still too high IMO, is more reasonable than the alternatives. i'm currently in the process of building

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] sb3 Power Supply

2007-01-05 Thread KeithL
Rummaging around I found a regulated linear power supply 1200ma with variable output from 1.5, 3, 4.5, 6, 9 and 12 volt dc. I am using it with my sb3 set on 4.5 volts. Is this worth using? Should I be looking for a much better power supply? It sounds fine, possibly slightly better than the stock

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Modifying the Squeezebox 3

2007-01-05 Thread Colin Reilly
Earlier in the thread someone mentioned removing C43 and C45 capacitors at the very least to improve the sound. I did this to my SB2 and now of course no sound. I am assuming this is done to improve the quality of the digital output in that case ? Is there anything I can do to restore the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: 24/96 on Transporter: should it work?

2007-01-05 Thread yooper
Thanks Dave. Your correct, I thought analog-dsp settings worked with analog-direct. Changing the rate is only available when using the analog-dsp mode, which I learned I don't want since I want to take advantage of the Transporter dac. I'm still learning about the two channel/Slimdevice

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] USB to S/PDIF (and AES/EBU) Converters

2007-01-05 Thread lafayette
I'm wondering if anyone has had experience using these converters? Two that I've read about here and there are: http://www.hagtech.com/hagusb.html And the oddly less expensive but more versatile: http://www.trendsaudio.com/EN/Product/USB_Audio_desc.htm This comes up because I've had a lot of

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: USB to S/PDIF (and AES/EBU) Converters

2007-01-05 Thread tomjtx
Get rid of a squeezebox? ARE YOU MAD? Where will the poor thing go? I'm seriously considering reporting you to SBPS (SB protective services) The sheer audacity of proposing this on these forums will keep me up all night. -- tomjtx

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: USB to S/PDIF (and AES/EBU) Converters

2007-01-05 Thread wr420
You can try a homeplug solution. ie running ethernet over mains power. Says its good up to 14mbs but I'm sure YMMV. My brother uses it and well, it works. 10mbs should be plenty for streaming lossless but as far as sound quality and running it over main power I'm not sure. I wouldn't think it

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: 24/96 on Transporter: should it work?

2007-01-05 Thread mswlogo
adamslim;149943 Wrote: 4608 is right (96000 * 24 * 2). I have one 24/96 DVD-A that I ripped and it works fine with my SB3 (which downsamples to 48). I'm not sure if the downsampling happens in the SB3 or at the server though. I'll do a sound comparison soon, once I have ripped in the CD

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Modifying the Squeezebox 3

2007-01-05 Thread Skunk
Colin Reilly;167535 Wrote: Is there anything I can do to restore the sound or am I wasting my time. I started off wanting to remove the Op Amp but realized I had bitten off more than I could chew. Serves me right. You didn't need to remove the caps, just the opamp itself. But then you

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Modifying the Squeezebox 3

2007-01-05 Thread dorkus
Colin Reilly;167535 Wrote: Earlier in the thread someone mentioned removing C43 and C45 capacitors at the very least to improve the sound. I did this to my SB2 and now of course no sound. i don't know which caps you are referring to but it sounds like you've removed the output coupling

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Modifying the Squeezebox 3

2007-01-05 Thread Skunk
dorkus;167574 Wrote: BUT, i am just taking a guess here, i do not know what C43 and C45 are and don't have a schematic in front of me... i'm sure someone else here will chime in though. It looks like c43 is part of the 9v power to the opamp. -- Skunk

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: USB to S/PDIF (and AES/EBU) Converters

2007-01-05 Thread lafayette
No, I won't get rid of the Squeezebox. It's nice to have. I can imagine having it hooked up to the computer (a foot of ethernet or whatever) and using it as an alternate interface. I can also see just using it in the bedroom. For my primary system, though, I don't want to have to worry about