Clango agrees, vinyl is better. :)
http://www.dieselsweeties.com/print/?date=20070422
--
SuperQ
SuperQ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2139
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showth
Mark Lanctot;196697 Wrote:
> Were you looking at this?
> http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.cgi?DIYPassiveAttenuation
Yes - and it means nothing to me. I'd ideally like to buy a fixed or
stepped balanced attenuator that enables me to get to full volume on
the transporter when I'm rocking, but st
I still roll with 25+ year old Quad gear, and I love it! Both my amp and
preamp really need to be rebuilt to some degree, but I'm a student, so I
can't complain for now.
I hope to continue to use my SB3 for centuries to come, but, like all
things computer related obsolescence is probably more of
adamslim;196696 Wrote:
> I think that's known as 'damning with faint praise' ;)
But they advertise the Bose on TV! It must be good! :-)
--
Mark Lanctot
Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?u
thomsens;196692 Wrote:
> I have no idea how to chose resister values (R1 & R2) to get to a fixed
> attenuator.
Were you looking at this?
http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.cgi?DIYPassiveAttenuation
--
Mark Lanctot
Mark La
Mike Anderson;196668 Wrote:
> The Kaboom box costs much less than a Bose radio, but the sound quality
> of the Kaboom blows the doors off a Bose (not to mention all the extra
> features.)
I think that's known as 'damning with faint praise' ;)
Adam
--
adamslim
SB3 into Derek Shek d2, Shanlin
I found out the input impedance to the amp is 7.8k on balanced inputs,
which sounds like it's really low. Not sure what that means in terms
of my ability to hook up directly. If I understand, the Transporter is
100. I have no idea how to chose resister values (R1 & R2) to get to a
fixed attenua
I run my Transporter with no attenuation into my B&K amp.
B&K @ 200wpc at full digital volume does not stress my speakers.
I normally present my audio at about -7db of full.
Appropriate listening room with proper equip cooling = great sound!
So...it depends on the system.
.
--
haunyack
Tr
ncpl;196618 Wrote:
> Just ask yourself what you would be buying if you won the lottery
> tonightKaboom or F80?
Even if I had money to burn, I would at least want to listen to them to
see which one has better sound.
I don't buy into the assumption that "more expensive" = "better sound."
Sure
jmourik;173941 Wrote:
> Does anybody have experience with one of these dacs?
>
> PS Audio Digital Link III
> http://www.psaudio.com/products/digital_link_iii_overview.asp
>
> Stello DA100
> http://hifi500.com/product/da100.htm
> http://www.soundstage.com/revequip/stello_da100.htm
>
> Altmann
ok, addendum to the anti-cables thread I started last week.
Let me say first that the issues about the Speltz's customer service
are behind me.
Judy has satisfactorily explained the lapse.
I retract any negative assessment or implication I may have intimated
in my previous rant.
Now - about the
There seems to be a lack of experience regarding these so I thought I
would throw in a comment or two.
First though, in praise of the SB3 DAC...
I had been running this through an Arcam Delta 90 amp, and was
impressed enough to sideline an Arcam Alpha 8 CDP and switch over to
streamed completely
...there is NO simple answer to that question.
The simple answer is actually whatever you want it to be.
Thankfully it's a horses for courses issue.
Just ask yourself what you would be buying if you won the lottery
tonightKaboom or F80?
--
ncpl
---
Mike Anderson;196568 Wrote:
> My question is whether the improved sound quality is worth the extra
> cash.
The simple answer to that is NO
But then again the audiophile market isn't really about value for
money.
--
Andyoz
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
