Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Doh! Now we need 24-bit/176.4kHz on the Transporter!

2008-01-07 Thread Phil Leigh
amcluesent;255419 Wrote: why do you want 176.4kHz playback? I'd tried to hint at my views with the initial 'Doh!' :) Then again, with a wide-band amp and super-tweeters who knows... I've got supertweeters and they won't go that high! -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Doh! Now we need 24-bit/176.4kHz on the Transporter!

2008-01-07 Thread Patrick Dixon
opaqueice;255188 Wrote: The White Stripes: ElephantWhite Stripes/Elephant is generally regarded as a well produced album. IIRC it was produced using analogue recording and mastering equipment and much song and dance was made about that on its release (in the UK at least). It sounds pretty

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Doh! Now we need 24-bit/176.4kHz on the Transporter!

2008-01-07 Thread DynamicalSystem
The Stone Roses eponymous debut is rather excellent music that was badly recorded. It sounds amazing on a large boomy PA, but over a revealing hi-fi it is barely listenable. -- DynamicalSystem DynamicalSystem's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Using RG6 Satellite/Cable Coax for audio?

2008-01-07 Thread seanadams
ar-t;255410 Wrote: You must be joking. RG-6(A) has a copperweld centre conductor. Translation: copper plated steel. Wouldn't even use it for digital cables. ar-t, can you elaborate? I've found it works darn well for s/pdif... (with BNCs). What would be better? -- seanadams

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Doh! Now we need 24-bit/176.4kHz on the Transporter!

2008-01-07 Thread opaqueice
Patrick Dixon;24 Wrote: White Stripes/Elephant is generally regarded as a well produced album. IIRC it was produced using analogue recording and mastering equipment and much song and dance was made about that on its release (in the UK at least). It sounds pretty good on my system -

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Doh! Now we need 24-bit/176.4kHz on the Transporter!

2008-01-07 Thread Robin Bowes
DynamicalSystem wrote: The Stone Roses eponymous debut is rather excellent music that was badly recorded. It sounds amazing on a large boomy PA, but over a revealing hi-fi it is barely listenable. You really think so? Perhaps you've not got it turned up loud enough! Don't waste your words, I

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Doh! Now we need 24-bit/176.4kHz on the Transporter!

2008-01-07 Thread gharris999
alekz;255217 Wrote: If we are talking Symphonic Dances, I would say: 1. Rachmaninoff himself (You can find his recordings) 2. Martha Argerich with her husband Alexandre Rabinovitch (Teldec, Elatus) 3. Kirill Kondrashin and Moscow Philarmonic Symphony Orchestra (Melodiya) - Many

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Doh! Now we need 24-bit/176.4kHz on the Transporter!

2008-01-07 Thread Patrick Dixon
opaqueice;255584 Wrote: Interesting. It's one of the few albums I have in 128 MP3, so I'll buy the CD and see if that helps. Do you listen to any noisy rock - say heavy metal or grunge? I think the CD's worth having. Some - although I tend to prefer the gentler tracks! I've liked

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Doh! Now we need 24-bit/176.4kHz on the Transporter!

2008-01-07 Thread Phil Leigh
opaqueice;255584 Wrote: Interesting. It's one of the few albums I have in 128 MP3, so I'll buy the CD and see if that helps. Do you listen to any noisy rock - say heavy metal or grunge? This is rather interesting...oddly enough this is the sort of album I would expect to sound rough as a

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Doh! Now we need 24-bit/176.4kHz on the Transporter!

2008-01-07 Thread Phil Leigh
Hmmm...nice! I Just Don't know what to do with Myself - loving the reverb bloom, valve vocals mics and what sound like very expensive 60's valve compressors/limiters. Ball Biscuit - great timing/rhythm - real dirty foot tapping stuff...and that lovely reverb again Thanks for provoking me to

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Doh! Now we need 24-bit/176.4kHz on the Transporter!

2008-01-07 Thread amcluesent
Do you listen to any noisy rock I had a go with Therion's Lepaca Kliffoth at the weekend...never again :) -- amcluesent amcluesent's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10286 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Using RG6 Satellite/Cable Coax for audio?

2008-01-07 Thread SuperQ
ar-t;255410 Wrote: You must be joking. RG-6(A) has a copperweld centre conductor. Translation: copper plated steel. Wouldn't even use it for digital cables. And BTW.there is no such thing as a 75 ohm RCA. No matter how much marketing hype from Canare that you read. As for Type

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 6moons preview ModWright Transporter

2008-01-07 Thread 325xi
jhm731;254729 Wrote: As soon as you have the skills to perform the upgrades that Alex does to the Transporter, please let us know. Oh, you're another believer, aren't you? I've seen a good book of audiophile spells and other magic triks that will most certainly improve sound of your

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 6moons preview ModWright Transporter

2008-01-07 Thread jhm731
325xi;255705 Wrote: Oh, you're another believer, aren't you? I've seen a good book of audiophile spells and other magic triks that will most certainly improve sound of your system... in your head. Yes, I believe that all audio equipment can be improved if you know what you're doing. --

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Doh! Now we need 24-bit/176.4kHz on the Transporter!

2008-01-07 Thread alekz
gharris999;255596 Wrote: Rachmaninoff: I don't think he ever recorded the Symphonic Dances, either as a conductor, or in the duo piano version. He was dead within two years of the work's premier. I will check just in case. I may be wrong, indeed. gharris999;255596 Wrote: I've got

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 6moons preview ModWright Transporter

2008-01-07 Thread seanadams
jhm731;255731 Wrote: Yes, I believe that all audio equipment can be improved if you know what you're doing. Certain kinds of modifications that involve reducing noise are not physically possible without a board respin. Also, no amount of skill could convert Transporter's digital audio path to

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 6moons preview ModWright Transporter

2008-01-07 Thread haunyack
seanadams;255739 Wrote: knob heh heh...he said knob. Snort. Does that change anybody's subjective opinion of Sean? Of course not, unless you rewire his noun. . -- haunyack Happy Leap Year! haunyack's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 6moons preview ModWright Transporter

2008-01-07 Thread seanadams
haunyack;255749 Wrote: heh heh...he said knob. Snort. Does that change anybody's opinion of Sean? Of course not, unless you rewire his noun. . I also said cockamamie. A highly underrated word IMHO. -- seanadams

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 6moons preview ModWright Transporter

2008-01-07 Thread haunyack
seanadams;255752 Wrote: I also said cockamamie. A highly underrated word IMHO. ...and my mother called me hunyak, although she was Norwegian. Love the TP. . -- haunyack Happy Leap Year! haunyack's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter playing 88 kHz files

2008-01-07 Thread airs
Will the SB be able to do 24/88.2 or 24/96? -- airs airs's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14794 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=40315

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 6moons preview ModWright Transporter

2008-01-07 Thread mr_bill
The analog ouput redesign that Dan Wright does, certianly has me intrigued. I read an article on Stereophile the other day from ___ Johnson the leader of Audio Research and his point was that tubes are inherently more linear than their solid state ouput counterparts. As Dan puts the tube output

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 6moons preview ModWright Transporter

2008-01-07 Thread seanadams
mr_bill;255785 Wrote: The analog ouput redesign that Dan Wright performs, certainly has me intrigued. I read an article on Stereophile the other day from ___ Johnson the leader of Audio Research and his point was that tubes are inherently more linear than their solid state ouput

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 6moons preview ModWright Transporter

2008-01-07 Thread Pat Farrell
seanadams wrote: mr_bill;255785 Wrote: Little do I know if the improvements are imaginary or real - I would like to find out. There will absolutely be a real and audible difference in sound. However, this is clearly meant to be a fun and visually appealing vintage mod for someone who

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Doh! Now we need 24-bit/176.4kHz on the Transporter!

2008-01-07 Thread gharris999
alekz;255733 Wrote: Only Russians or Jewish can play Russian music.You sound authoritative on this point. Are you Russian? Jewish? Both? What about Finns? I quite like the Järvi recordings I've got of Tchaikovsky, Taneyev, Prokofiev Shostakovich, though I'm not always sure why: the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 6moons preview ModWright Transporter

2008-01-07 Thread jhm731
seanadams;255739 Wrote: Certain kinds of modifications that involve reducing noise are not physically possible without a board respin. Also, no amount of skill could convert Transporter's digital audio path to 32-bit, unless you redesigned nearly the entire product from scratch. I.e., it is

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 6moons preview ModWright Transporter

2008-01-07 Thread rajacat
If tubes are just a way of changing the tone and adding distortion , would rolling capacitors just be performing the same function? Now on one hand tube detractors say that tubes just introduce some pleasant form of distortion but present a sound which is not as close to reality as pure solid