I'll also add a vote for the Lavry. I have a DA-10 and have been
extremely pleased with it.
--
mlsstl
mlsstl's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9598
View this thread:
timequest;425441 Wrote:
I just read about Wi-Fi being limited to 16/44.1.
Where did you read this?
--
aubuti
aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074
View this thread:
Hehe, what, you didn't know your $20 wifi router actually included an
amazing process that resamples any audio format on the fly? ;)
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this
aubuti;425444 Wrote:
Where did you read this?
What Rumour magazine? - actually this is the the sort of rubbish that
is often written in Hi-Fi mags...
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
SB3 (wired) - TACT 2.2X
andyg;425451 Wrote:
Hehe, what, you didn't know your $20 wifi router actually included an
amazing process that resamples any audio format on the fly? ;)
It doesn't? - I'm taking it back...
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd
The difference you're hearing could be due to higher gain in the op amp
section of the DAC compared to the op amp in the Squeezebox. If you do
the same test with the analog and digital outputs from a CD player, do
you hear the same difference?
--
TiredLegs
These go to eleven. - Nigel Tufnel
andyg;425451 Wrote:
Hehe, what, you didn't know your $20 wifi router actually included an
amazing process that resamples any audio format on the fly? ;)
Yes its pretty clever stuff. It will simply drop all samples when
placed far away.
I know its not related nor do I know why, but apparently
timequest;425441 Wrote:
I just read about Wi-Fi being limited to 16/44.1. Is this the case for
all Wi-Fi? Would I be better off switching my Wi-Fi based server (Duet)
to a physical connection? I just became aware that the Duet is limited
to 24/48, which I originally did not know when I
Well...I'm relieved then! It's true; you can't always believe what you
read. I tried to find the thread that I was reading over at (don't know
if I can say the name...Agon), but I can't find it. I had come across
it when researching re-clocking devices, and it read, most Wi-Fi is
limited to
timequest wrote:
I would be willing to spend a grand
(hopefully less, but not much more).
What say you in the know?
Get a Transporter.
R.
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
Is it this one?
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?icomp1222794208openusidzzAudioengr45#Audioengr
In that case the statement is most wifi *devices* are lim.. i.e.
something else. I didn't count so for all I know that may or may not be
true.
--
bhaagensen
Fatila;424194 Wrote:
Thank you for all the information. Most of the active speakers I have
seen thus far are way beyond my £3-3.5k budget for this system. Although
that may indeed be the optimal listening solution, it seems the only way
to connect the Transporter with reasonable cost, is a
Robin Bowes;425498 Wrote:
timequest wrote:
I would be willing to spend a grand
(hopefully less, but not much more).
What say you in the know?
Get a Transporter.
R.
If you have a Transporter for a grand or less I'll take it today.
Actually, I happen to like the controller
bhaagensen;425497 Wrote:
Is it this one?
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?icomp1222794208openusidzzAudioengr45#Audioengr
In that case the statement is most wifi *devices* are lim.. i.e.
something else. I didn't count so for all I know that may or may not be
true.
timequest;425535 Wrote:
Since I have the DAC, and I like the features of the Duet, it makes
sense that I would look for methods to extend the performance of the
Duet (for less than what a Transporter costs). I do agree that if the
cost to upgrade the Duet surpasses a certain point, it would
egd;425560 Wrote:
It's 4:16am here so perhaps my brain is a little foggy, but hooking an
external DAC up to your Receiver will bypass the Duet's DAC, so where's
the problem...what you're hearing is the external DAC?
Where in the world are you
literally? And, what are you doing up man;
bhaagensen;425497 Wrote:
Is it this one?
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?icomp1222794208openusidzzAudioengr45#Audioengr
In that case the statement is most wifi *devices* are lim.. i.e.
something else. I didn't count so for all I know that may or may not be
true.
That Poster
Phil Leigh;425571 Wrote:
That Poster (Steve N) is talking about most wi-fi based audio playback
devices (like Airport Express, Roku soundbridge etc) as being limited...
not to wi-fi itself as a networking method.
The modern SB family is not part of this limited set of devices. SB3
can do
timequest;425562 Wrote:
Where in the world are you
literally? And, what are you doing up man;
according to USA Today, less than 5 hours of Z-time over time will put
an end to you!?Top right hand corner of my posts provides location :-). They
have any
tips how to stay asleep?
19 matches
Mail list logo
