Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0

2011-04-22 Thread Helloharry
Hi soundcheck, i had applied your mods with great results and everything is smooth until yesterday i applied the network optimisation tweaks accrding to toolbox v2 1.9 for win7 and at first it is great and after a while i experience cracklings/dropoffs especially when i am inputing commands on iss

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Better resampling for SB Classic and Touch (probably all)

2011-04-22 Thread earwaxer9
Wombat;626896 Wrote: > > Depending on the setting using a 25% phase response with sox i found it > already changing frequencys from 16khz on my impulse samples. So that > may play a role here. > > You have to guarantee that "Upsampling + 20kHz Lowpass + 40khz LowPass" > is doing a better job to

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Better resampling for SB Classic and Touch (probably all)

2011-04-22 Thread earwaxer9
thanks Wombat - i will study the link -- earwaxer9 System: modified Winsome Labs Mouse, modified Maggie MMG's, Transporter, HSU sub 12, MSB DAC to 500 watt sub slave amp, JPS labs power cords, Silver audio interconnect, Audioquest Granite speaker cable.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Better resampling for SB Classic and Touch (probably all)

2011-04-22 Thread Wombat
earwaxer9;627021 Wrote: > > I dont understand why (or where) the 20k lowpass would be applied to > 24bit data > > Thanks for your help! We mentioned in this thread already that on upsampling from 44.1kHz to 96kHz a lowpass must be applied, thats how it works with all software resamplers. http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Better resampling for SB Classic and Touch (probably all)

2011-04-22 Thread earwaxer9
Wombat;626896 Wrote: > > Depending on the setting using a 25% phase response with sox i found it > already changing frequencys from 16khz on my impulse samples. So that > may play a role here. > > Edit: Some more food for thought > > Lets assume these are the factors that change the sound for

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Setting Transporter to Slave for World Clock Input

2011-04-22 Thread vpnogueira
michael123;626956 Wrote: > I tested Transporter feeding EMM XDS1 via AES/EBU without any issues. Hello Michael, Thank you! This is great news. How much better is the XDS1 receiving 24/96 instead of 16/44or48? Would you mind sharing the settings you use in the EMM Labs and Transporter when f

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Rega DAC - Has anyone auditioned one yet?

2011-04-22 Thread SteveVai
rgro;626719 Wrote: > My recommendation is to not cancel the Rega Dac---it's well worth a > listen and has, what I believe, is a sound all its own. Whether you > like it or not can only be known by listening. Wait for it to arrive, > set it up and have a good listen---give it at least 2-3 weeks

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Setting Transporter to Slave for World Clock Input

2011-04-22 Thread michael123
vpnogueira;626897 Wrote: > Dear Sean Adams, > > Is it possible to transfer high def audio 24/96 from the Transporter to > EMM Labs DCC2 SE? > > Thanks, > > Vicente I tested Transporter feeding EMM XDS1 via AES/EBU without any issues. -- michael123 Please fix http://bugs.slimdevices.com/s

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] For the objectivist/empiricists in the crowd

2011-04-22 Thread michael123
MediaCenter;626835 Wrote: > Nothing new... > > http://audiofest.net/2011/video_player.php?video_id=10&Sid=80efee7d4d6e9f305219e75b346fdafa > > You need bionic ears to hear the difference... Most of people claim there is no difference at all. So it is a step forward -- michael123 Please fix